mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-01-03, 10:17   #243
BotXXX
 
BotXXX's Avatar
 
Aug 2003
Europe

2×97 Posts
Default

Congratulations!
BotXXX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-03, 18:13   #244
M51
 
Dec 2018

2 Posts
Default Another article

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/0..._prime_number/
M51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-04, 05:44   #245
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

3×2,861 Posts
Default

Quote:
The new addition, named M82589933, belongs to a special class of prime numbers known for being particularly large.
Grrr... wooden tongue... (even for a non-native English speaker, like me). Good point the fact that points to the official release, tho..
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-04, 15:15   #246
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

3·7·17·23 Posts
Default

The new accounts per day has been having some wild gyrations of late:
https://www.mersenne.org/primenet/graphs.php

Everytime a new article hits it must be making a difference.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-04, 22:06   #247
philmoore
 
philmoore's Avatar
 
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.

1,117 Posts
Default What's 13 got to do with it?

Can anyone explain to me why this thread is titled "Lucky 13"?

I would also like to point out the significance of the fact that George Woltman and GIMPS have now discovered 1/3 of the known Mersenne primes. Extending the number of known Mersenne primes (and known perfect numbers) by 50% has never before happened in recorded history. It may, however, have happened in pre-history by the person who came up with the perfect number definition in Euclid's Elements, Book 7 and the proof that, essentially, Mersenne primes generate perfect numbers at the end of Book 9. The first people who formulated the concept of prime number may have discovered that 3, 7, and 31 are all prime, but I believe that the unknown person who is responsible for the perfect number theory in Euclid is also the person who discovered the fact that 496 shared a property with the numbers 6 and 28. This property may have been noticed by Egyptian mathematicians working with fractions in the form that 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/6 = 1, and 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/7 + 1/14 + 1/28 = 1, but I think that the person who extended this property to 496 must have recognized the justification in a way similar to that in Book 9, Proposition 36.
philmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-04, 22:25   #248
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

2×1,289 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philmoore View Post
Can anyone explain to me why this thread is titled "Lucky 13"?
Explained here.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-06, 17:45   #249
JeppeSN
 
JeppeSN's Avatar
 
"Jeppe"
Jan 2016
Denmark

7·17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philmoore View Post
Extending the number of known Mersenne primes (and known perfect numbers) by 50% has never before happened in recorded history.
However, Robinson (the first person to use a computer for the Mersenne search) extended the number of known Mersenne primes from 12 to 17 in just nine months (in 1952). GIMPS has used over 22 years to extend the Mersenne prime count by 50%, from 34 to 51. /JeppeSN
JeppeSN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-06, 18:44   #250
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

2·1,289 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeppeSN View Post
However, Robinson (the first person to use a computer for the Mersenne search) extended the number of known Mersenne primes from 12 to 17 in just nine months (in 1952).
The gap from 127 to 521 (the exponent of Robinson's first prime) was a ratio of 4.10, which is the largest known. The people doing LL tests by hand hadn't gotten past 257, if I recall...

If we have a similar relative gap after M51, then M52 will be (521/127) * 82589933 = M338813819

Which is actually a prime exponent!

And a 100M-digit Mersenne number!!

But... it has factors.


But it has a twin prime exponent M338813821 !!

Which also has a factor.


Seriously... a storybook ending... the exponent at the exact indicated spot being not just a prime but a twin prime... all ruined by a few stupid factors.

The nearest actual candidates are M338813749 and M338813953.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-07, 06:17   #251
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

3×2,861 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
Seriously... a storybook ending... the exponent at the exact indicated spot being not just a prime but a twin prime... all ruined by a few stupid factors.
Haha, this post is genius! We love it!
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-08, 22:52   #252
philmoore
 
philmoore's Avatar
 
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.

1,117 Posts
Default

Just a correction: The first to search for Mersenne primes via computer was not Raphael Robinson in 1952, but rather the team of Max Newman and Alan Turing, using the University of Manchester Mark I computer in 1951 to search all exponents up to 609 without finding a new prime. Unfortunately, the available memory was not sufficient to test the next prime exponent 621, so they just missed making the first Mersenne prime discovery by computer!
philmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-08, 23:01   #253
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

2·1,289 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philmoore View Post
Just a correction: The first to search for Mersenne primes via computer was not Raphael Robinson in 1952, but rather the team of Max Newman and Alan Turing, using the University of Manchester Mark I computer in 1951 to search all exponents up to 609 without finding a new prime. Unfortunately, the available memory was not sufficient to test the next prime exponent 621, so they just missed making the first Mersenne prime discovery by computer!
That can't be right. Your numbers are off. The Mersenne primes in that section are 521 and 607.

I'm halfway to memorizing the complete list of Mersenne prime exponents. It's the new digits-of-pi.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lucky number gaps robert44444uk Prime Gap Searches 23 2019-08-23 20:45
Fun with the Lucky Numbers of Euler ewmayer Probability & Probabilistic Number Theory 0 2015-10-18 01:37
Extremely lucky assignments apocalypse GPU to 72 6 2015-04-07 04:41
Lucky ECM hit Dubslow Factoring 3 2014-10-19 19:10
Lucky gmp-ecm curve... WraithX GMP-ECM 4 2009-01-12 16:29

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:28.

Thu Jul 9 04:28:20 UTC 2020 up 106 days, 2:01, 0 users, load averages: 1.65, 1.43, 1.45

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.