![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Sep 2002
23·37 Posts |
![]()
i know very little about linux in general but i was wondering if some one could explian the two diffrent linux versions
the dynamically linked and the static linked versions is one better than the other or are they ment for two diffrent versions of linux how do they compare in speed to a windows based prime95 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Dec 2003
23·33 Posts |
![]() Quote:
The advantages of a dynamically linked binary is that it o is smaller o may share library functions with other programs (conserves memory) o will take advantage of optimized libraries where availiable, and your Linux distro almost certainly provide optimized libc and libm for your platform. A statically linked binary o may load faster, becuase you don't have to look for libraries. But it's bigger too, so your mileage may vary. o can run even if the required libraries are not availiable, i.e. if you are running on an ancient distro. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sep 2003
50358 Posts |
![]()
Basically, you should use the dynamic version (mprime), it will work for most people. Only try the static version (sprime) if the dynamic version can't execute because of missing libraries.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newb who needs help with PC | EddieTheBear | Hardware | 19 | 2015-10-23 13:22 |
Newb question | PicGrabber | Msieve | 20 | 2014-10-31 20:06 |
100MD LL Test - Newb Question | Neo | Information & Answers | 6 | 2011-01-02 16:01 |
Possibly stupid question about porting games to Linux. | jasong | Linux | 4 | 2006-12-23 21:24 |
a simple question on the Linux client | nngs | Software | 1 | 2005-11-27 01:39 |