Posts that seem less than useless, or something like that

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by retina

No single question can eliminate the possibility of A being Random.

Yeah... That's what we are /trying/ to argue.

We are trying to teach. F' me. We can't win.

Please trust we know what we are doing.

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by retina

Still not clear to me. Even assuming you add all the "xor <stuff>" and can get a clear yes/no. You can still be fooled. The first answer tells you nothing about B ... or A, or C.

Retina... Do you have an answer?

Perspiring minds want to know.

Please reply.

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by uau

Which tells you that C is not random. (Obviously the first answer can't literally tell you "B is not random" always about B specifically, as sometimes B is random!)

Some will find this funny. Others not so much.

Be prepared to stand alone.

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by kriesel

The same approach applies to other GPU models. Different models make different design tradeoffs, and those are likely to lead to different values of end-user-optimized performance/watt or performance/5-year-lifecycle-total-cost.

Well, yeah... Any undergraduate would be able to spew that.

What would *you* *do*, in that situation? Please give your matrix; a CSV or TSV would be fine. Thanks.

A sincere question.

[Dobri]

You just might be addicted to GIMPS if you succeed to convince CERN to shut down the large hadron collider and invest billions of euros in GIMPS because all these three-sigma detector bumps are pure numerology and are nowhere near six-sigma to claim a discovery. Furthermore, the Higgs boson was duly discovered and the standard model is complete.

Oh, wait, but isn't the search for another Mersenne prime the most extreme numerology of all by trying to find a number that might not exist?