20171222, 03:33  #1 
Dec 2017
F0_{16} Posts 
Unique Groupings found in the first 49 mersenne numbers
I decided to convert the P in the formula 2P1 to a Numerology number of all the mersenne numbers found to date. As like all of us we searching for patterns to Mersenne Numbers. Well I can say that this graph implies so far that picking a prime number to test maybe more of a hit when choosing a number and that 1 and 5 are good canadates. I might have taken a little random chance out of it when choosing a Prime number to test. Take a look at the graph. When figuring out for P related to a numerology number simply add the number together with this link.
Take for instance the P for the 12th mersenne prime. The P=127. That number adds to 1 in numerology. 1+2=3 3+7=10 10 reduces to 1 in numerology. My current number that is being tested which is on a LL test equals a 5 in numerology. Although I have some mini surprise for us, it's not a sure thing. What do you guys and gals think, has this been tried before? One oddity that I found is a prime number never adds to a 6 or 9 in numerology. Interesting! http://www.rkm.com.au/CALCULATORS/CA...umerology.html The data set beginning with the first P for the first mersenne to the 49 th. 2 3 5 7 4 8 1 4 7 8 8 1 8 4 1 7 4 4 5 4 5 5 8 2 2 7 1 5 1 1 1 2 5 1 2 2 5 5 1 1 4 5 7 2 5 1 8 5 4 Last fiddled with by ONeil on 20171222 at 03:38 
20171222, 03:46  #2  
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2704_{16} Posts 
Quote:
Now, if some number "p" is 9x+6 or 9x+9, do you think it can be prime? If "p" is not prime, can 2^{p}1 be prime? There you go. Oddity? Interesting? not really. 

20171222, 03:46  #3 
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
6641_{10} Posts 
Haha, well good luck.
But why not choose 0, 6 or 9? They are the most underrepresented so clearly they should be more likely to come up. Right? I mean just to even up the numbers. It would be awful (not aweful) if 1 and 5 got away from the others. Here we go again ... patterns in Mersenne primes, and yet only 49 samples to work with. And why base10. What is special about base10? What is the rationale behind choosing base10? Oh wait, did I use a made up word "rationale"? 
20171222, 08:28  #4  
Dec 2017
2^{4}×3×5 Posts 
Numerology with the P value
Quote:
9x+9 no I don't believe so. Show me a number using this equation which will give you a prime number. 

20171222, 08:34  #5 
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
6641_{10} Posts 

20171222, 09:21  #6 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
10011100000100_{2} Posts 
That's you saying yes without even understanding that you said yes.
Let me give you an example. Suppose someone gives you a number 1899867868118...781326427864827. Question 1. Is it odd or even? Question 2. Do you need to know what is in the '...' part to answer Question 1? Question 3. Do you need to know anything at all except the last digit? Question 4. Did you use division to answer questions 13? The answer to Question 4 is no, you didn't have to use division, but you did get a remainder from division by 2: either odd ('1') or even ('2' or '0'). Residue from division by 9 is very similar  you can get it without division. What is the residue of 4275? Residue from 4000 is 4; Residue from 200 is 2; Residue from 70 is 7; Residue from 5 is 5; and if you sum these four lines up you will get: Residue from 4275 is 4+2+7+5. Pick up some math textbook. You will find a lot of interesting things. 
20171222, 10:01  #7  
Dec 2017
2^{4}×3×5 Posts 
Pattern found in Graph
Quote:


20171222, 10:52  #8 
Jun 2003
3^{4}×67 Posts 

20171223, 05:26  #9  
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
10100000000101_{2} Posts 
Quote:


20171223, 08:19  #10 
Dec 2017
2^{4}·3·5 Posts 
Do you guys just chalk this up to coincidence?
Are you guys suggesting the data on mersenne primes for a statement that P when adding to 5 or 1 in numerology is the best choice when choosing for P is just coincidence for now? What if I'm right? Then say in another 50 years the data proves this would I be credited for taking a bit of randomness out of finding mersenne primes?
Last fiddled with by ONeil on 20171223 at 08:20 
20171223, 08:52  #11  
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
29·229 Posts 
Quote:
Plus my mention of base10 above was not addressed by you. Why base10? Why not the residue in base69 or base42? What is the rationale behind base10? How is it special that it can predict prime exponents for Mesenne numbers? 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Ideal groupings in number fields  carpetpool  Abstract Algebra & Algebraic Number Theory  3  20180113 18:13 
I think I found proof that no odd perfect numbers exist!  Philly314  Aliquot Sequences  3  20141116 14:58 
How to know if you found a mersenne prime.  Sutton Shin  PrimeNet  7  20121002 05:57 
Shortest sequence of numbers not found in M43  Xyzzy  Miscellaneous Math  41  20081108 17:57 
LLT numbers, linkd with Mersenne and Fermat numbers  T.Rex  Math  4  20050507 08:25 