mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Miscellaneous Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-04-15, 16:38   #34
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

16BF16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MathDoggy View Post
What do I have to fix, retina
Everything.

retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-15, 16:41   #35
MathDoggy
 
Mar 2019

5×11 Posts
Default

Ok.
Lol

Last fiddled with by MathDoggy on 2019-04-15 at 16:41
MathDoggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-15, 16:52   #36
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

2,969 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MathDoggy View Post
Should I quit to try to fix the proof?
It is because nothing is working
What do you think the chances are that these simple arguments will prove the twin prime conjecture, while no mathematicians have found this simple proof in the last several hundreds of years?
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-15, 22:02   #37
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·4,643 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
What do you think the chances are that these simple arguments will prove the twin prime conjecture, while no mathematicians have found this simple proof in the last several hundreds of years?
Two economists are walking down the street...

One says to the other: "Was that a hundred dollar bill just lying there on the street?

"Of course not," says the other economist, "or someone would have already picked it up...
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-15, 23:42   #38
wblipp
 
wblipp's Avatar
 
"William"
May 2003
New Haven

22×32×5×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wblipp View Post
Ooops. This means at least one prime (p) exists beyond those in the list. But why must it be a twin prime?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathDoggy View Post
There is no such implication
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathDoggy View Post
Should I quit to try to fix the proof?
It is because nothing is working
Now would be a good time to step back and try to understand why nothing is working. You have successfully shown "there must be at least one prime outside of previous consideration" several times. But the thing you trying to prove requires showing that "there are two primes outside of previous consideration" and also "these two primes are very close together." You can adapt your methods to prove there are two primes, but nothing in your methods says anything about how close together they are.

This is a valid learning method - try to do something, see what's wrong, try to fix it, repeat. You need to get better at seeing what's wrong yourself.

If you were hoping to learn why the twin prime conjecture is hard, you are probably done or nearly so. At least until you learn some tools about closeness of primes.
wblipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Twin Prime Conjecture Proof Steve One Miscellaneous Math 53 2019-03-18 00:34
Proof of the twin prime conjecture (NOT!) Awojobi Miscellaneous Math 40 2019-02-10 16:36
A proof for the Twin Prime Conjecture Carl Fischbach Miscellaneous Math 7 2009-06-24 05:52
Awesome song on Twin Prime Conjecture. cipher Twin Prime Search 0 2009-04-15 12:21
The Twin Prime Conjecture Song Templus Lounge 9 2006-03-14 16:30

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:56.

Sat Oct 31 10:56:44 UTC 2020 up 51 days, 8:07, 2 users, load averages: 2.48, 2.44, 2.22

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.