![]() |
![]() |
#617 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
11100110001102 Posts |
![]()
Now that v30.8b15 mprime / prime95 have been promoted to general availability at https://www.mersenne.org/download/, "beta" in the thread title no longer accurately reflects the status.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#618 | |
Apr 2003
Milan, Italy
22·32 Posts |
![]() Quote:
In my configuration I have the following lines related to CERT work: Code:
$ grep Cert /var/lib/gimps/local.txt CertDailyRemainingLastUpdate=1654697164 CertDailyMBRemaining=40 CertDailyCPURemaining=10 CertWork=1 CertDailyCPULimit=10 Last fiddled with by Kaboom on 2022-07-07 at 12:28 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#619 | |
Mar 2019
USA
97 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Code:
./mprime -m |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#620 | ||
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
110010101112 Posts |
![]()
Since it is hot wave here I decide to run CRUS but on my Ryzen 7 3700x
Quote:
Now I set 2 workers , 4 cores per test ( on base 395. k4) Every time worker 2 gives ok results, and every time worker 1 gives some kind of error. But when I see this in log I stop all Quote:
Now I recheck all results (106 of them) from this batch on two other CPU to verify results and so far even "poor" residue match. Log is attached (ziped) Any idea? Last fiddled with by pepi37 on 2022-07-07 at 20:21 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#621 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
41×199 Posts |
![]()
Just a guess. The errors are hardware related (the round off error is not barely over 0.4, it is way over 0.4).
Perhaps, 1 worker fits completely in the L3 cache and 2 workers does not. This would make 1 worker faster than 2 workers and thus more stressful on the FPU/CPU/caches. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#622 |
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
3×541 Posts |
![]()
576k candidate x2 workers should or not fit in 1x16 MB of L3 cache, my cpu has 2 x 16MB
Since this CPU have one CCX with eight cores , I assume first worker will put candidate in first pat of L3 cache , and second worker will put in second part of L3 cache. Now I rerun same tests on him also but now in config 4 workers ( 2 cores per workers) and it works perfectly. I must do additional test to see can I use 2*4 combination on higher FFT size or I will be forced to use 1*8 combination on higher FFT candidate. Last fiddled with by pepi37 on 2022-07-07 at 22:16 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#623 |
Apr 2003
Milan, Italy
2416 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#624 |
May 2005
England, UK
27 Posts |
![]()
I've updated my old 32-bit Dell laptop running Windows 7 Enterprise to p95v308b15, but the program doesn't work. It won't start up; nothing happens.
Can you confirm that Windows 7 32-bit is still supported? The older p95v307b9, which I still have works fine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#625 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
1FDF16 Posts |
![]()
I can confirm it is *supposed* to work. I do not have a 32-bit Windows install to test on. Has anyone else tried 30.8b15 on Win32?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#626 | |
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
3·5·127 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Then open a command prompt window, navigate to the Prime95 folder, then launch Prime95. Maybe you will see a message... If none of this gives any clue, you could try to look in the EventViewer... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#627 |
Apr 2003
Milan, Italy
22×32 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do not post your results here! | kar_bon | Prime Wiki | 40 | 2022-04-03 19:05 |
what should I post ? | science_man_88 | science_man_88 | 24 | 2018-10-19 23:00 |
Where to post job ad? | xilman | Linux | 2 | 2010-12-15 16:39 |
Moderated Post | kar_bon | Forum Feedback | 3 | 2010-09-28 08:01 |
Something that I just had to post/buy | dave_0273 | Lounge | 1 | 2005-02-27 18:36 |