mersenneforum.org On the Infinity of Twin Prime and other K-tuples
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2022-09-25, 00:18   #111
Dr Sardonicus

Feb 2017
Nowhere

11000010001002 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by retina It doesn't matter how "obvious" it is (or isn't). Without a proof you have nothing. So prove it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jzakiya
Quote:
 Originally Posted by retina It doesn't matter how "obvious" it is (or isn't). Without a proof you have nothing. So prove it.
I've been very reluctant to even respond to these type of ad hominem statements,
No. Saying you have no proof is not an "ad hominem statement."

This sort of false accusation is unacceptable.

I am giving you a week off to think about it.

2022-09-25, 04:10   #112
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter

"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

10,273 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by jzakiya Let me guess, you've never read my paper(s), or seen my video. Right? You have no idea what I've presented as the mathematical basis of my "proof". Right? If your life depended it on it you couldn't accurately state what I say constitutes my proof. Right?
Wrong. I read that so called paper after mart_r post (which made me curious), and I bet my life that the so called proof is bullshit. Ban is well deserved.

You have there a lot of reasoning mistakes, not counting "obvious" (you like this word so much) notation mistakes. For example, just in the very beginning of the paper, in formula (2) you define primorial as product of all the primes smaller than n, which is correct,[tex]p_n# =\product{p_i} = 2\cdot 3\cdot 5\cdot ...\cdot p_n\ [\tex](2) but then, immediately after, in (3), you make a mess of it: [tex](p_n1)# \product{(p_i1)} = (21)\cdot(31)\cdot(51)\cdot...\cdot(pn1)\ [\tex](3). Nope, [tex](p_n1)#[\tex] should be just the product of primes to [tex]n-1[\tex] and that's all. Your mess of notation is very confusing, and it shows disrespect for the reader, who has to guess what you mean. Also, in your "infinitude" of primes chapter, you show the reason only for the first two primorials, where the things go very nice, but you can not extend that "forever", just try it for the third and see how (and why) it fails.

Generally, the "paper" is a big mixture of very elementary things (probably it give credibility if you affirm well known things ) and bullshit.

You affirm in your CV that you teach math, I really feel sorry for the money your students pay to you, the money are wasted. Honestly.

Last fiddled with by S485122 on 2022-09-25 at 07:19 Reason: why the mathjax doesn't work??

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post robert44444uk Prime Gap Searches 45 2022-02-24 18:28 Puzzle-Peter Software 156 2019-06-03 20:19 hal1se Miscellaneous Math 13 2018-11-05 16:34 hydeer Lone Mersenne Hunters 9 2018-04-03 22:54 cuBerBruce Puzzles 3 2014-12-01 18:15

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:32.

Sun Jan 29 03:32:12 UTC 2023 up 164 days, 1 hr, 0 users, load averages: 0.73, 0.81, 0.88

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔