![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Aug 2002
7·1,223 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Jun 2003
2·2,719 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
2×3,343 Posts |
![]()
Perhaps I missed something in the description but it seems that the first player can easily win by simply taking all of the pebbles on the first move leaving none the the second player.
Edit: Oops, I certainly did miss something. The shape is supposed to be three dimensional. Last fiddled with by retina on 2014-07-16 at 07:42 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
![]()
Hardly surprising, the problem is not very well described. The notation for the example moves seems a little odd too: clearly the six numbers in a move are numbers of pebbles to be taken from each edge of the tetrahedron, but nowhere does the writer define in which order the edges are considered.
I suppose the problem is a variation of the game of Nim. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Jun 2003
124768 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
2·3·23·61 Posts |
![]()
so they want all the possible lines to winning ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Aug 2002
7×1,223 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
July 2017 | R. Gerbicz | Puzzles | 6 | 2017-08-08 22:58 |
July 2016 | Xyzzy | Puzzles | 4 | 2016-08-06 22:51 |
July 2015 | Xyzzy | Puzzles | 16 | 2015-08-19 16:13 |
Happy July 4th | LaurV | Lounge | 8 | 2012-07-06 00:13 |
Max on the move: vacation June 28/30-July 4 | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 8 | 2009-07-05 05:20 |