20080226, 22:03  #1 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×7×461 Posts 
Gratuitous factors thread
There are enough postprimeshere threads around the forum; why not have a straight factorreporting thread?
Fibonacci(1057) splits as Code:
13 (from fib(7)) 2113 5737 (from fib(151)) 2811666624525811646469915877 (from fib(151)) 138350496838007817946168356320856056973722649268262385229683944504459890710941261550861377381 579400004209795506836855348508059769276857157977636895767235484362787481855282292783501899717 It turns out that a nice polynomial is Code:
X6 13 X5 22 X4 20 X3 15 X2 20 X1 22 X0 13 Y0 9969216677189303386214405760200 = fibonacci(150) Y1 26099748102093884802012313146549 = fibonacci(152) Sieving (small primes <20M both sides, 29bit large primes, algebraic Q from 20M to 26M) with a version of ggnfslasieve14e with AMD64 inmost loops, provided by Joppe_Bos, took 350 CPUhours on a quadcore between the evening of 20 Feb and the evening of 24 Feb; linear algebra took twelve hours elapsed on four cores with msieve1.29 after 24 hours elapsed running msieve1.33 failed twice. Code:
Tue Feb 26 09:07:58 2008 Msieve v. 1.29 Tue Feb 26 09:07:58 2008 random seeds: 61c9c503 bb85da82 Tue Feb 26 09:07:58 2008 factoring 80160278450369029675301820882583949386439598567656024023074809662156062976897267540529441973163794688549751389930277383387860710672396567733782351879018091888240823999096047736754101177 (185 digits) Tue Feb 26 09:07:58 2008 commencing number field sieve (185digit input) Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 R0: 9969216677189303386214405760200 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 R1: 26099748102093884802012313146549 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 A0: 13 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 A1: 22 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 A2: 20 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 A3: 15 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 A4: 20 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 A5: 22 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 A6: 13 Tue Feb 26 09:07:59 2008 size score = 2.482582e09, Murphy alpha = 0.457348, combined = 2.178482e09 Tue Feb 26 09:08:33 2008 restarting with 46684329 relations Tue Feb 26 09:08:33 2008 Tue Feb 26 09:08:33 2008 commencing relation filtering Tue Feb 26 09:08:33 2008 commencing duplicate removal, pass 1 Tue Feb 26 09:08:53 2008 error 10 reading relation 2538761 Tue Feb 26 09:09:30 2008 error 10 reading relation 7621819 Tue Feb 26 09:09:33 2008 error 5 reading relation 7939293 Tue Feb 26 09:15:08 2008 found 5218088 hash collisions in 46684326 relations Tue Feb 26 09:15:08 2008 commencing duplicate removal, pass 2 Tue Feb 26 09:15:43 2008 found 1644119 duplicates and 45040207 unique relations Tue Feb 26 09:15:43 2008 memory use: 153.2 MB Tue Feb 26 09:15:58 2008 ignoring smallest 1765441 rational and 1764938 algebraic ideals Tue Feb 26 09:15:58 2008 filtering ideals above 28411870 Tue Feb 26 09:15:58 2008 need 6001644 more relations than ideals Tue Feb 26 09:15:58 2008 commencing singleton removal, pass 1 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 relations with 0 large ideals: 1246348 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 relations with 1 large ideals: 6481454 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 relations with 2 large ideals: 14712300 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 relations with 3 large ideals: 15765354 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 relations with 4 large ideals: 6834751 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 relations with 5 large ideals: 0 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 relations with 6 large ideals: 0 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 relations with 7+ large ideals: 0 Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 45040207 relations and about 35198724 large ideals Tue Feb 26 09:21:52 2008 commencing singleton removal, pass 2 Tue Feb 26 09:27:48 2008 found 11351344 singletons Tue Feb 26 09:27:48 2008 current dataset: 33688863 relations and about 22558216 large ideals Tue Feb 26 09:27:48 2008 commencing singleton removal, pass 3 Tue Feb 26 09:33:27 2008 found 2244020 singletons Tue Feb 26 09:33:27 2008 current dataset: 31444843 relations and about 20250502 large ideals Tue Feb 26 09:33:27 2008 commencing singleton removal, pass 4 Tue Feb 26 09:37:39 2008 found 445915 singletons Tue Feb 26 09:37:39 2008 current dataset: 30998928 relations and about 19801800 large ideals Tue Feb 26 09:37:39 2008 commencing singleton removal, final pass Tue Feb 26 09:42:54 2008 memory use: 1069.9 MB Tue Feb 26 09:42:54 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:42:57 2008 begin with 30998928 relations and 24256194 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:43:36 2008 reduce to 24129552 relations and 17058063 ideals in 14 passes Tue Feb 26 09:43:36 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 21 Tue Feb 26 09:43:50 2008 removing 2762897 relations and 2362897 ideals in 400000 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:43:52 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:43:54 2008 begin with 21366655 relations and 17058063 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:44:19 2008 reduce to 21184591 relations and 14509433 ideals in 11 passes Tue Feb 26 09:44:19 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 21 Tue Feb 26 09:44:31 2008 removing 2039103 relations and 1639103 ideals in 400000 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:44:32 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:44:34 2008 begin with 19145488 relations and 14509433 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:44:50 2008 reduce to 19025741 relations and 12748424 ideals in 8 passes Tue Feb 26 09:44:50 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 20 Tue Feb 26 09:45:01 2008 removing 1324891 relations and 1049219 ideals in 275672 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:45:02 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:45:04 2008 begin with 17700850 relations and 12748424 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:45:15 2008 reduce to 17644945 relations and 11642541 ideals in 6 passes Tue Feb 26 09:45:15 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 18 Tue Feb 26 09:45:25 2008 removing 7328 relations and 6569 ideals in 759 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:45:25 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:45:27 2008 begin with 17637617 relations and 11642541 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:45:29 2008 reduce to 17637617 relations and 11635972 ideals in 1 passes Tue Feb 26 09:45:29 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 18 Tue Feb 26 09:45:31 2008 dataset has 70.0% excess relations Tue Feb 26 09:45:45 2008 ignoring smallest 1599304 rational and 1599464 algebraic ideals Tue Feb 26 09:45:45 2008 filtering ideals above 25570683 Tue Feb 26 09:45:45 2008 need 5401480 more relations than ideals Tue Feb 26 09:45:45 2008 commencing singleton removal, final pass Tue Feb 26 09:48:35 2008 memory use: 545.0 MB Tue Feb 26 09:48:35 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:48:37 2008 begin with 17637617 relations and 11966014 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:48:47 2008 reduce to 17622381 relations and 11950776 ideals in 6 passes Tue Feb 26 09:48:47 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 86 Tue Feb 26 09:48:56 2008 removing 674050 relations and 538988 ideals in 135062 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:48:57 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:48:59 2008 begin with 16948331 relations and 11950776 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:49:07 2008 reduce to 16932010 relations and 11395346 ideals in 5 passes Tue Feb 26 09:49:07 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 82 Tue Feb 26 09:49:17 2008 removing 611009 relations and 475947 ideals in 135062 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:49:17 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:49:19 2008 begin with 16321001 relations and 11395346 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:49:30 2008 reduce to 16307182 relations and 10905467 ideals in 6 passes Tue Feb 26 09:49:30 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 80 Tue Feb 26 09:49:39 2008 removing 2113 relations and 1879 ideals in 234 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:49:39 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:49:41 2008 begin with 16305069 relations and 10905467 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:49:43 2008 reduce to 16305069 relations and 10903588 ideals in 1 passes Tue Feb 26 09:49:43 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 80 Tue Feb 26 09:49:49 2008 dataset has 53.0% excess relations Tue Feb 26 09:50:01 2008 ignoring smallest 1432262 rational and 1431620 algebraic ideals Tue Feb 26 09:50:01 2008 filtering ideals above 22729496 Tue Feb 26 09:50:03 2008 need 4321184 more relations than ideals Tue Feb 26 09:50:03 2008 commencing singleton removal, final pass Tue Feb 26 09:55:58 2008 memory use: 545.0 MB Tue Feb 26 09:55:58 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:56:00 2008 begin with 16305069 relations and 11237769 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:56:10 2008 reduce to 16298227 relations and 11230927 ideals in 6 passes Tue Feb 26 09:56:10 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 84 Tue Feb 26 09:56:19 2008 removing 1473354 relations and 1100296 ideals in 373058 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:56:20 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:56:21 2008 begin with 14824873 relations and 11230927 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:56:33 2008 reduce to 14739381 relations and 10043549 ideals in 7 passes Tue Feb 26 09:56:33 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 80 Tue Feb 26 09:56:42 2008 removing 1478198 relations and 1105140 ideals in 373058 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:56:44 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:56:45 2008 begin with 13261183 relations and 10043549 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:56:55 2008 reduce to 13161373 relations and 8836505 ideals in 7 passes Tue Feb 26 09:56:55 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 73 Tue Feb 26 09:57:04 2008 removing 29069 relations and 25386 ideals in 3683 cliques Tue Feb 26 09:57:04 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 09:57:06 2008 begin with 13132304 relations and 8836505 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 09:57:10 2008 reduce to 13132260 relations and 8811075 ideals in 3 passes Tue Feb 26 09:57:10 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 72 Tue Feb 26 09:57:12 2008 dataset has 22.4% excess relations Tue Feb 26 09:57:28 2008 ignoring smallest 1263956 rational and 1262966 algebraic ideals Tue Feb 26 09:57:28 2008 filtering ideals above 19888309 Tue Feb 26 09:57:28 2008 need 3812809 more relations than ideals Tue Feb 26 09:57:28 2008 commencing singleton removal, final pass Tue Feb 26 10:00:21 2008 memory use: 427.8 MB Tue Feb 26 10:00:21 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 10:00:23 2008 begin with 13132260 relations and 9147172 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 10:00:32 2008 reduce to 13123839 relations and 9138751 ideals in 6 passes Tue Feb 26 10:00:32 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 76 Tue Feb 26 10:00:40 2008 removing 433127 relations and 346988 ideals in 86139 cliques Tue Feb 26 10:00:41 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 10:00:42 2008 begin with 12690712 relations and 9138751 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 10:00:49 2008 reduce to 12682928 relations and 8783934 ideals in 5 passes Tue Feb 26 10:00:49 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 74 Tue Feb 26 10:00:57 2008 removing 378613 relations and 292474 ideals in 86139 cliques Tue Feb 26 10:00:58 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 10:00:59 2008 begin with 12304315 relations and 8783934 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 10:01:06 2008 reduce to 12297618 relations and 8484730 ideals in 5 passes Tue Feb 26 10:01:06 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 73 Tue Feb 26 10:01:08 2008 dataset has 8.0% excess relations Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 relations with 0 large ideals: 91906 Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 relations with 1 large ideals: 681265 Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 relations with 2 large ideals: 2840946 Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 relations with 3 large ideals: 4544444 Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 relations with 4 large ideals: 3229255 Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 relations with 5 large ideals: 905771 Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 relations with 6 large ideals: 4024 Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 relations with 7+ large ideals: 7 Tue Feb 26 10:01:10 2008 commencing 2way merge Tue Feb 26 10:01:22 2008 reduce to 8302574 relation sets and 4489686 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 10:01:22 2008 commencing full merge Tue Feb 26 10:03:53 2008 found 4147342 cycles, need 2919886 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 weight of 2919886 cycles is about 154335943 (52.86/cycle) Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 distribution of cycle lengths: Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 1 relations: 782600 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 2 relations: 385903 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 3 relations: 304758 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 4 relations: 269138 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 5 relations: 249355 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 6 relations: 232065 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 7 relations: 214749 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 8 relations: 192664 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 9 relations: 163643 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 10+ relations: 125011 Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 heaviest cycle: 12 relations Tue Feb 26 10:03:56 2008 matrix not dense enough, retrying Tue Feb 26 10:03:57 2008 dataset has 8.0% excess relations Tue Feb 26 10:04:08 2008 ignoring smallest 1094161 rational and 1092296 algebraic ideals Tue Feb 26 10:04:08 2008 filtering ideals above 17047122 Tue Feb 26 10:04:08 2008 need 3812809 more relations than ideals Tue Feb 26 10:04:08 2008 commencing singleton removal, final pass Tue Feb 26 10:06:09 2008 memory use: 427.8 MB Tue Feb 26 10:06:09 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 10:06:11 2008 begin with 12297618 relations and 8824820 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 10:06:19 2008 reduce to 12292838 relations and 8820040 ideals in 6 passes Tue Feb 26 10:06:19 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 73 Tue Feb 26 10:06:20 2008 dataset has 1.6% excess relations Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 relations with 0 large ideals: 91906 Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 relations with 1 large ideals: 518702 Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 relations with 2 large ideals: 2390850 Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 relations with 3 large ideals: 4286603 Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 relations with 4 large ideals: 3551153 Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 relations with 5 large ideals: 1310709 Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 relations with 6 large ideals: 136678 Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 relations with 7+ large ideals: 6237 Tue Feb 26 10:06:22 2008 commencing 2way merge Tue Feb 26 10:06:33 2008 reduce to 8289324 relation sets and 4816526 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 10:06:33 2008 commencing full merge Tue Feb 26 10:09:16 2008 found 3915353 cycles, need 2712726 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 weight of 2712726 cycles is about 160120693 (59.03/cycle) Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 distribution of cycle lengths: Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 1 relations: 661530 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 2 relations: 306539 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 3 relations: 258942 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 4 relations: 238367 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 5 relations: 228364 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 6 relations: 217156 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 7 relations: 205383 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 8 relations: 190868 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 9 relations: 171372 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 10+ relations: 234205 Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 heaviest cycle: 13 relations Tue Feb 26 10:09:18 2008 matrix not dense enough, retrying Tue Feb 26 10:09:19 2008 dataset has 1.6% excess relations Tue Feb 26 10:09:28 2008 ignoring smallest 922548 rational and 921008 algebraic ideals Tue Feb 26 10:09:28 2008 filtering ideals above 14205935 Tue Feb 26 10:09:28 2008 need 3812809 more relations than ideals Tue Feb 26 10:09:28 2008 commencing singleton removal, final pass Tue Feb 26 10:11:30 2008 memory use: 427.8 MB Tue Feb 26 10:11:30 2008 commencing inmemory singleton removal Tue Feb 26 10:11:31 2008 begin with 12297618 relations and 9167592 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 10:11:40 2008 reduce to 12290840 relations and 9160814 ideals in 6 passes Tue Feb 26 10:11:40 2008 max relations containing the same ideal: 73 Tue Feb 26 10:11:41 2008 dataset has 11.3% excess relations Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 relations with 0 large ideals: 91906 Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 relations with 1 large ideals: 372899 Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 relations with 2 large ideals: 1928669 Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 relations with 3 large ideals: 3914092 Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 relations with 4 large ideals: 3810493 Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 relations with 5 large ideals: 1790949 Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 relations with 6 large ideals: 347769 Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 relations with 7+ large ideals: 34063 Tue Feb 26 10:11:43 2008 commencing 2way merge Tue Feb 26 10:11:55 2008 reduce to 8283314 relation sets and 5153288 unique ideals Tue Feb 26 10:11:55 2008 commencing full merge Tue Feb 26 10:14:56 2008 found 3750644 cycles, need 2561488 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 weight of 2561488 cycles is about 166852483 (65.14/cycle) Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 distribution of cycle lengths: Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 1 relations: 525516 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 2 relations: 255017 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 3 relations: 232994 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 4 relations: 223229 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 5 relations: 220595 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 6 relations: 212259 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 7 relations: 204608 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 8 relations: 193110 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 9 relations: 178116 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 10+ relations: 316044 Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 heaviest cycle: 13 relations Tue Feb 26 10:14:59 2008 commencing cycle optimization Tue Feb 26 10:15:03 2008 start with 12944342 relations Tue Feb 26 10:15:27 2008 pruned 318966 relations Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 distribution of cycle lengths: Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 1 relations: 525516 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 2 relations: 260946 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 3 relations: 241057 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 4 relations: 230100 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 5 relations: 230329 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 6 relations: 221452 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 7 relations: 213953 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 8 relations: 197789 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 9 relations: 177039 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 10+ relations: 263307 Tue Feb 26 10:15:28 2008 heaviest cycle: 13 relations Tue Feb 26 10:15:29 2008 Tue Feb 26 10:15:29 2008 commencing linear algebra Tue Feb 26 10:15:33 2008 read 2561488 cycles Tue Feb 26 10:15:42 2008 cycles contain 7467019 unique relations Tue Feb 26 10:16:54 2008 read 7467019 relations Tue Feb 26 10:17:08 2008 using 32 quadratic characters above 536865870 Tue Feb 26 10:21:19 2008 read 2561488 cycles Tue Feb 26 10:22:15 2008 filtering completed in 3 passes Tue Feb 26 10:22:16 2008 matrix is 2509266 x 2509465 with weight 221586585 (avg 88.30/col) Tue Feb 26 10:22:39 2008 read 2509465 cycles Tue Feb 26 10:22:41 2008 matrix is 2509266 x 2509465 with weight 221586585 (avg 88.30/col) Tue Feb 26 10:22:42 2008 saving the first 48 matrix rows for later Tue Feb 26 10:22:43 2008 matrix is 2509218 x 2509465 with weight 167640535 (avg 66.80/col) Tue Feb 26 10:22:43 2008 matrix includes 64 packed rows Tue Feb 26 10:22:43 2008 using block size 65536 for processor cache size 4096 kB Tue Feb 26 10:23:07 2008 commencing Lanczos iteration (4 threads) Tue Feb 26 21:01:14 2008 lanczos halted after 39684 iterations (dim = 2509213) Tue Feb 26 21:01:19 2008 recovered 44 nontrivial dependencies Tue Feb 26 21:01:20 2008 Tue Feb 26 21:01:20 2008 commencing square root phase Tue Feb 26 21:01:20 2008 reading relations for dependency 1 Tue Feb 26 21:01:20 2008 read 1254923 cycles Tue Feb 26 21:01:24 2008 cycles contain 4429577 unique relations Tue Feb 26 21:02:09 2008 read 4429577 relations Tue Feb 26 21:02:41 2008 multiplying 6203778 relations Tue Feb 26 21:19:22 2008 multiply complete, coefficients have about 170.77 million bits Tue Feb 26 21:19:29 2008 initial square root is modulo 1344767 Tue Feb 26 21:39:50 2008 prp93 factor: 138350496838007817946168356320856056973722649268262385229683944504459890710941261550861377381 Tue Feb 26 21:39:50 2008 prp93 factor: 579400004209795506836855348508059769276857157977636895767235484362787481855282292783501899717 Tue Feb 26 21:39:50 2008 elapsed time 12:31:52 
20080227, 05:22  #2 
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3×7×167 Posts 
I've never tried any of these programs, except ecm. When you talk about failures, is it stuff that you have to tweak, or does the program have some sort of method for cycling through various combinations? I have no idea what kind of combinations, but it seems like there are different variations that can be tried, or maybe I'm just reading non math intensive comments in the factoring threads wrong.
(It's fun to scan the math threads for stuff that makes sense. Not that the rest is nonsensical, but if you don't have the knowledge it's mostly gobbledegook. :) ) 
20080227, 12:15  #3  
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10B7_{16} Posts 
Quote:
Just as I'm asking this question I thought of what it might be, just based on the letters...C185 means a composite, 185digit number, and P93 means a prime, 93 digit number. Is that shot in the dark at all right? Or something to do with Cunningham numbers? Yes, that's correct  fivemack Last fiddled with by fivemack on 20080227 at 13:16 Reason: answered in place 

20080305, 15:28  #4 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×7×461 Posts 
Lucas(1233) =
Code:
19 * 45702379 * Lucas(411) * 44287282091880235117923432515961253359268605892636945776483995749 * 159539728465877952283323572019287689118580024745329748535563445093460821051903111798130855082136071 
20080305, 16:06  #5  
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
16524_{8} Posts 
Quote:
Welcome to the club!!!!! I've had entire collections of sievers shut down because some retard decided to dump multigigabytes of data onto a shared file system and thereby run it out of space. It leaves corrupted records at the ends of my output files. This has happened at least a halfdozen times. Naturally the users who do this never bother to check if there is enough space before they dump their data...... 

20080307, 02:46  #6  
Feb 2005
404_{8} Posts 
Quote:
This formula can be used directly to get a polynomial representation of degree k1: where and . 

20080309, 16:34  #7  
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3,733 Posts 
Quote:
Most of these efforts come from the odd perfect number search (http://www.oddperfect.org/), which I've been involved with for a year or so now. To start: 421^591 (C144, difficulty 157.46) by SNFS factors as 8769524964618840768473228417817739675245059818515901 * 35824627104830457305942978653803062873922140670229459114188957954764951096171385903989548363 using the polynomial c5: 1 c0: 421 Y1: 1 Y0: 31001674351559225686692396607441 6M relations from ggnfs 13e siever on one core of a Athlon64 2.2GHz for a few days followed by msieve postprocessing to produce a 395010 x 395258 matrix with weight 25331768  ben. 

20080309, 16:43  #8 
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3,733 Posts 
By GNFS, the 125 digit cofactor of 1119387697^191 factors as
3484602912243398707185898705317541418197499305758241 * 8829353630392603956189074833285818490567582542294628525126057810179844037 ~10M relations over a week or so of sieving on one core of a 2.2GHz Athlon64, followed by msieve postprocessing to produce and solve a 826086 x 826334 matrix with weight 60653808. 
20080309, 16:52  #9 
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3,733 Posts 
By P1, the C135 cofactor of 64271^371 factors as
274817637397314759415229527351079 * P102 using a version of P1 which I wrote, with a stage one bound of 1e8 and stage two bound of 2e9. 
20080309, 16:59  #10 
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3733_{10} Posts 
By QS, 11^174+10^174 (C103) factors as
8055091904195531129734494480052194800703416701 * 282676276623675825398802382490193608881327644834991216513 after about 5 hours sieving using msieve 1.33 on 4 Xeon 5160 cores 
20080317, 23:08  #11 
Mar 2008
37_{16} Posts 
A couple of SNFS results
I've just completed a few factorizations from the homogeneous cunningham reservation list.
Code:
11,6,136+ (C134) 917147464621732445846263197551265176491969916515669969.P80 11,8,136+ (C116) 3019860452197352866441914806309105477611721850147079815601.P59 11,9,136+ (C119) 20392009066511518061382980231029180353909229649.P73 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Gratuitous OPN factors  wblipp  Factoring  463  20190530 07:19 
Ungracious Factors Thread  FactorEyes  Factoring  2  20110409 05:45 
Missing factors at the 'Known Factors' page  MatWurS530113  PrimeNet  11  20090121 19:08 
JasonG's gratuitous C++ thread  jasong  Programming  16  20061107 01:03 
Gratuitous hardwarerelated banana thread  GP2  Hardware  7  20031124 06:13 