![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
21318 Posts |
![]()
I moved 12 cores from port 8000.
I put the I7s on ports 4000 or 5000 as their sieve jobs finished. Current allocation 20 cores on 4000 (12 now, 8 more by tomorrow morning sometime) 24 cores on 5000 09 cores on 8000 - all 64bit Linux Last fiddled with by IronBits on 2009-05-02 at 07:25 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Jan 2005
Sydney, Australia
5×67 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
41·271 Posts |
![]()
All results for n=520K-580K have now been processed. Results and primes have been checked against the usual places. No problems found. Excellent work everyone. For as quickly as we blew through this range and the large # of primes, it was a nice job keeping up with everything accurately.
Karsten, on your 10th drive page, you can complete the 557K-558K range. Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
41×271 Posts |
![]()
All results for n=580K-600K have now been processed. Results and primes have been checked against the usual places. No problems found.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
41×271 Posts |
![]()
With the sieving drive now complete, I have now sent a file sieved to P=45T to David for n=630001-650000 for reloading into port 8000. This will involve stopping the server temporarily, deleting the current k/n pairs in that range at the end of the file, pasting the new pairs in at the end, and restarting the server.
I debated whether to go through with this hassle but ultimately felt it was worth it. It means that 4000+ composite k/n pairs will NOT have to be tested meaning that we should find primes around 2% faster than before when we get to that range, which should be in < 2 days. ![]() Thanks to everyone for the excellent and fast job of sieving the range. Now, n=630K-1M will all test 2% faster, which amounts to nearly 75,000 k/n pairs that will not have to be tested! This will especially save a huge amount of testing time for n>900K, where tests will take, on average, more than twice as long as the current n=~625K range. Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
3×7×53 Posts |
![]()
Done.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
41×271 Posts |
![]()
Karsten,
Can you process the results for n=600K-620K to me for this drive? Thanks, Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
41·271 Posts |
![]()
Reserving n=650K-680K for port 8000.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
255478 Posts |
![]()
Results and primes for n=600K-650K for this drive have been verified against the usual places. No problems were found.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Mar 2006
Germany
B9716 Posts |
![]()
does anybody noticed this close high-n pair!?
1495*2^659159-1 1815*2^659158-1 it's a new highest difference-1 n-pair for all k < 2000 so far! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
41·271 Posts |
![]()
Primes and results for this drive for n=650K-660K have been verified against the usual places. No problems found.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Team drive #12 k=2000-3000 n=50K-425K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 96 | 2012-02-19 03:53 |
Team drive #9 k=1005-2000 n=50K-350K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 236 | 2009-06-25 10:04 |
Sieving drive for k=1003-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 160 | 2009-05-10 00:50 |
Team drive #8 k=1400-2000 n=350K-500K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 101 | 2009-04-08 02:11 |
Sieving drive for k=1005-2000 n=200K-500K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 118 | 2009-01-17 16:05 |