![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Nov 2003
2×1,811 Posts |
![]()
Hi diep,
Yes, there is a jump in the length of the used FF transform, from about 144k to 160k, at n=2750k. The next jump to 192k will appear at n=3274k. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Sep 2006
The Netherlands
26×11 Posts |
![]()
Ah many thanks!
So the next jump makes it extra tough to find stuff of 1M digits :) After a slow start first few months, it's 16 cores now which went steady, yet i guess i soon have to increase that to 32+ cores to keep the momentum because of the huge slowdowns. Too bad i can't throw into battle the gpu's yet. Know a description of how it works with this fft len size and the used transform? I have a book from Pomerance & Crandall, yet those descriptions are not very usable to write code from and so far it seems one of the few books at least attempting to describe something :) The FFT i implemented a few years ago, it works in a power of 2 larger. So to calculate n limbs one needs an array sized 2n limbs, which simply would mean a single 8 core box is same speed like 1 GPU, instead of the GPU being roughly 5x faster (Tesla C2075's i have here) or more than a single 8 core Xeon box here :) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
10011000000012 Posts |
![]()
Hi diep,
I found this: 69*2^2428251-1 is prime! (730979 decimal digits) Time : 2077.484 sec. HEHEHEHEHEHE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Sep 2006
The Netherlands
2C016 Posts |
![]()
Congratulations!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Sep 2006
The Netherlands
26×11 Posts |
![]()
Did you finish it now to 2.5M?
As i started at 2.5M as appointed. It's testing to 3M here now in the current batch. Last fiddled with by diep on 2014-01-15 at 14:15 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
130116 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Check progress here: http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=14087 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Sep 2006
The Netherlands
26·11 Posts |
![]()
Maybe you find another few primes there, let's hope so!
As for 69, note after this 2.41M find i hadn't expected in the range till 3M for another 2 at least to be there! I thought: "maybe there is one around 2.8Mbit". Yet already 2 showed up now :) Last fiddled with by diep on 2014-01-15 at 14:55 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Sep 2006
The Netherlands
26·11 Posts |
![]()
Last cores will take some time to finish yet 3M nearly completed.
Divided 3M-4M into pieces. Cores already busy short while there. Maybe the gem shows up as the last to be checked! All machines being equipped with ECC is tough to blame on a bitflip in RAM :) If the crashed internet machine here fixed and other IT stuff might have look at CUDA again for doing Riesel with it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Sep 2006
The Netherlands
26×11 Posts |
![]()
Prime!
69 * 2 ^ 3097340 - 1 is prime Please can one or more try to verify? Thanks, Vincent |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
5·7·139 Posts |
![]()
If you trust your hardware just submit it. Only within an hour I will have an open slot to test this number.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
2·3·599 Posts |
![]() Code:
69*2^3097340-1 is prime! Time : 2579.994 sec. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |