mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > No Prime Left Behind

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-01-22, 16:33   #760
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronBits View Post
Is this even possible? Look at the top two from Max.
http://stats.ironbits.net/statsnew/p...score&type=asc
Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Those are a couple of personal results from Max. I'm not sure those kinds of efforts should be counted in our total stats but they are likely to be laying around here and there so I wouldn't mess with it.

Yes, it is possible. The k can be as large as you want it to. I've seen k's > 40 digits before.


Gary
Quote:
Originally Posted by kar_bon View Post
i think those pairs/primes should be deleted because they distort the primes found by NPLB on regular efforts!
i did so for my personel stats for checking all LLRnet-results!
Oh! I almost forgot about those. Those were arbitrary, very tiny primes I pulled off rieselprime.org and ran in the server earlier on in order to test my prime-checking scripts.

David: yes, you can go ahead and remove them from the database, I thought I nipped all of 'em in the bud before you even started importing G4000 results but it seems I was wrong.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-22, 16:34   #761
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3·2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
David,

I have now checked primes.txt for port 9000 up to k=1800 vs. the results files. Everything is matching up but there is a double entry for one prime in there:

1773 181608 IronBits
[2009-01-18 19:54:42]
1773*2^181608-1 is prime! Time : 65.0 sec.
1773 181608 IronBits
[2009-01-18 19:56:23]
1773*2^181608-1 is prime! Time : 166.0 sec.


Were there some pairs that got processed twice? There shouldn't have been because Max would have let me know if the results didn't match the file that we sent you for this range.


Gary
If it got sent back once, and then sent back a second time as a rejected k/n pair, the main result would go to rejected.txt but it would still be logged twice in primes.txt.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-22, 16:36   #762
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
David,

There is a big pile of invalid lines in the joblist.txt file for port 8000. It appears to be 4025 "jobs" that stem from the start of the n=200K-210K range back on Jan. 2nd that was abrubtly halted. They don't seem to be affecting anything but they do make it a little inconvienient to see who has the first true k/n pair in their queue for an extended period.

Let's consult with Max first but do you think it would be a problem to delete them before the rally starts? I have attached the exact lines that need to be deleted. They all have a k-value in the n=200000-210000 range. You can just do a find on "/3" to get to the first good job and delete all of the jobs above it being careful not to delete any extra commas or brackets. (sorry if I'm stating the totally obvious here)


Max,

Do you see any undue risk from this? I believe David would have to temporarily stop the server, carefully delete the bad lines, and then restart the server. Do I understand that right?


Gary
Hmm...well, if they're just hanging around in joblist, I don't see too much risk in leaving them in. The server seems to be ignoring them just fine for now...and messing with joblist can be quite fishy, so as long as they don't take up too much disk space we may as well leave them in.

Of course, if/when at some point we end up drying the IB8000 server, then we can safely remove them (since a dry server should have an essentially blank joblist, so we can safely remove every job in the file).
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-22, 23:05   #763
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

54248 Posts
Default

These is a user (Fozzie) on IB8000 who is creating rejected pairs quite regularly. My guess is that he/she is running LLRNET more than once in a folder. Can an admin look into this and notify that person about a possible fix. Hate to see someone waste resources (even a possible Free DC'er).
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-23, 01:11   #764
IronBits
I ♥ BOINC!
 
IronBits's Avatar
 
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)

3·7·53 Posts
Default

I left the redirect for Port400 to internal 4000 so that we don't lose glenpat's contributions until he has time to fix it on his end, or wakes up and reads this.

Port 400 is now dead
Long live Port 4000
I appended the last knpairs Gary sent me to port 400's knpairs so we could continue on as normal. (without the header he sent with it ;p )
IronBits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-23, 14:17   #765
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

7×1,447 Posts
Default

Can someone get ahold of LaurenU2? He is submitting tons of rejected results every hour. I have no idea what he could be doing....running the same pairs on 2 different machines?

Also, he has 2-3 new primes that he needs to submit to top-5000 and post here. I tried Emailing him a few hours ago and haven't gotten a response. I don't know if he comes to this forum at all.

David or Carlos, if you can contact him, perhaps at Free-DC, to let him know about the primes and rejected results, that would be helpful.

The rejected results kind of make me wonder about a possible proxy server. We don't want that with this kind of firepower on the rally. He may not be aware that we don't allow proxy servers.

I think Free-DC Is losing a lot of possible results. lol


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-01-23 at 14:19
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-23, 14:21   #766
IronBits
I ♥ BOINC!
 
IronBits's Avatar
 
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)

45916 Posts
Default

He is not using a proxy, I didn't set him up that way.
He works during the day, and he has been told about the primes...
I don't know what could be causing the rejected results...
If he is using my care package then he uses a different directory for each client per core.
IronBits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-23, 14:22   #767
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

2·5·283 Posts
Default

He is now with 108 cores up, more 60 to go...lol
em99010pepe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-23, 14:25   #768
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

7·1,447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronBits View Post
He is not using a proxy, I didn't set him up that way.
He works during the day, and he has been told about the primes...
I don't know what could be causing the rejected results...
If he is using my care package then he uses a different directory for each client per core.
Perhaps ruuning LLRNet twice in the same folder? But if he used your care package, I don't see how that could happen. In your care package, did you have a different GUIport in the llr-clientconfig.txt files of each folder?

I feel kind of funny asking a server guy that question. lol

You said he has been "told" about the primes. Do you mean just by the automatic Email notification? I saw those also that went to him. What I meant is, is there another way to contact him?


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-01-23 at 14:26
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-23, 14:27   #769
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

7·1,447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by em99010pepe View Post
He is now with 108 cores up, more 60 to go...lol
He's losing processing on many of them right now with all the rejected results.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-23, 14:34   #770
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

2·5·283 Posts
Default

Maybe is the cache wu set to 1. I checked IB file and it is correct.
Lannart had the same issue when he was running my server and he said it was a issue of the server not handling all the results.

Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2009-01-23 at 14:37
em99010pepe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PRPnet servers for NPLB mdettweiler No Prime Left Behind 228 2018-12-26 04:50
Servers for NPLB gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 0 2009-08-10 19:21
LLRnet servers for CRUS gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 39 2008-07-15 10:26
NPLB LLRnet server discussion em99010pepe No Prime Left Behind 229 2008-04-30 19:13
NPLB LLRnet server #1 - dried em99010pepe No Prime Left Behind 19 2008-03-26 06:19

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:07.

Mon Jun 1 14:07:31 UTC 2020 up 68 days, 11:40, 2 users, load averages: 2.93, 2.46, 2.04

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.