mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-04-30, 17:55   #265
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

7,691 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Update: b4 still has the issue with hanging when exiting (it was doing P+1, it may be related or not). It needs to be killed from taskman on both Win7 and Win10. When you "stop" it (from the menu, or right-clicking the icon), two or three workers (from 6) still won't stop, .
In what P+1 stage were the hung workers? Are the workers mult-threaded?
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-04-30, 22:04   #266
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

2×1,601 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nordi View Post
Maybe you should try "UnreserveExponents=999", which does the opposite of what the name implies: It protects 999 exponents per worker from bein unreserved. I set it on my system because mprime kept unreserving assignments.
I have UnreserveDays=9999. Not sure if it actually uses that full value, but it does not complain and does not unreserve anything.
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-04-30, 23:26   #267
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

22×607 Posts
Default

George, any chance you could update post #2 with the version 30.6 bug fixes?

Last fiddled with by ixfd64 on 2021-04-30 at 23:26 Reason: removed extra word
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-01, 08:22   #268
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

22×11×223 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
In what P+1 stage were the hung workers? Are the workers mult-threaded?
Don't know about the stage, sorry. I finished it, and I won't be back to it too soon, say until they will be offered for automatic assignments. Kinda too much of a headache to make the exponent list for assignments. I also finished my work in 13M (for now). Be back later.

About the threading, yes, there were 6 workers, each using 3 cores, in a 18-cores CPU (i9-10980xe). Usually, second and third hanged. But I am sorry I can not give more details. Right now, doing PRP-CF in same 6 workers, and also doing front P-1 in a single worker (18 cores), not in the same time, of course, haha, everything works fine, as supposed to work. No hanging.

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2021-05-01 at 08:22
LaurV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-01, 12:05   #269
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

1100100000102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
Or you could just look at the live report:
https://www.mersenne.org/report_pplus1/?f=1
https://www.mersenne.org/report_pplus1/?f=1&all=1

Only 14 of the 24 current listed factors are real P+1 factors. The rest are old factors found again or combination of old factors found as composite or the same P+1 factors from days ago found for the 2nd time, because people are not using the known factors in the worktodo lines.

Any way to improve the report?

These 10 are not real:

Code:
92 821		40000000 5240000000	6	5	6042060144547476324897523777583				2021-04-30 05:09:12.250
296 663		10000000 500000000	6	5	33472736879943425145991507583				2021-04-30 13:15:54.873
19 000 043	1000000	1000000		6	5	3062497001568580991					2021-04-29 06:41:20.290
19 000 087	1000000	55000000	6	5	composite:165612834709033744097242153925591		2021-04-29 21:33:07.540
19 000 099	1000000	1000000		6	5	composite: 6556735832659867930257216861791		2021-04-30 00:17:38.310
19 000 187	1000000	1000000		6	5	composite: 2148714300288186353				2021-04-30 11:50:22.557
19 000 259	1000000	1000000		6	5	composite: 1449071846137904258057			2021-04-29 20:02:07.513
19 000 411	1000000	57000000	6	5	composite: 3759440282766424334351228034173859299863351	2021-04-29 01:12:55.823
19 000 697	1000000	54000000	6	5	457554313955057777					2021-04-30 07:22:56.087
19 000 853	1000000	57000000	6	5	26850678692775826607					2021-04-29 21:36:39.270

We are at 14 factors from 5038 curves: 9 P+1 smooth and 5 P-1 smooth.

https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...&postcount=199

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2021-05-01 at 12:19
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-01, 15:46   #270
nordi
 
Dec 2016

5B16 Posts
Default

One number is actually missing from the P+1 report: a factor was found for M92459 . It was found in stage 1 of P+1, so it probably slipped through the mechanism that creates that report.
nordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-01, 17:50   #271
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

7,691 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nordi View Post
One number is actually missing from the P+1 report: a factor was found for M92459 . It was found in stage 1 of P+1, so it probably slipped through the mechanism that creates that report.
A bug in the SQL VIEW that tosses rows where a subsequent run used larger bounds
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-01, 18:22   #272
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

1100100000102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nordi View Post
One number is actually missing from the P+1 report: a factor was found for M92459 . It was found in stage 1 of P+1, so it probably slipped through the mechanism that creates that report.
It has been showing in the factor only report since you found it:

https://www.mersenne.org/report_pplus1/?f=1&all=1
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-01, 18:58   #273
crasher86
 
May 2021

1 Posts
Default

I'm kind off clueless.

While pime 30.3.1.0 (beta6) passes all large FFTs

30.5.0.0 and 30.6.1.0(beta6) gets Fatal error on every worker in the first test.

30.6.1.0(beta6):
Test1, 44000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M7471106 using FMA3 FFT lenght 384K, Pass1=384, Pass2=1K, clm=1.
Fatal ERROR:Final result was 00000000, expected:3D4F6CBB.
Hardware failure detected running 384K FFT size.


This behaviour is even under factory defaults.
Is there a Problem with ryzen 5800x (2CCD versions, with 1 deacivated CCD)
crasher86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-01, 20:52   #274
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

7,691 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crasher86 View Post
I'm kind off clueless.

While pime 30.3.1.0 (beta6) passes all large FFTs

30.5.0.0 and 30.6.1.0(beta6) gets Fatal error on every worker in the first test.
A bug was introduced somewhere in the 30.4/30.5 changes. Your problem is fixed in 30.6 build 4.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-02, 00:00   #275
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

DCE16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
Only 14 of the 24 current listed factors are real P+1 factors.
Any way to improve the report?
I have updated the report to show prime component factors when a composite was reported by P+1.
And the discovery date of each prime factor is compared to the P+1 run date, and already-known factors are now shown smaller (and with a tooltip indicating the discovery date). If you have UI suggestions for how to present this better it can be modified.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 10:58.


Wed Dec 8 10:58:31 UTC 2021 up 138 days, 5:27, 1 user, load averages: 1.72, 1.84, 1.61

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.