![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Oct 2019
17 Posts |
![]()
Hi, sorry to bother you guys, but I've been experiencing this error on all my Google accounts recently:
"Failed to execute cell. Could not send execute message to runtime: SecurityError: Permission denied to access property "traceDefinedHardwareId" on cross-origin object" Is it a known problem with a known solution? Here are the error details: Permission denied to access property "traceDefinedHardwareId" on cross-origin object self.tr_NMvxyzOxhGbceXrQ/<@https://colab.research.google.com/github/chalsall/GPU72_CoLab/blob/master/gpu72_tf.ipynb:3:9 self.tr_NMvxyzOxhGbceXrQ@https://col...gpu72_tf.ipynb:41:6 get@https://colab.research.google.co...gpu72_tf.ipynb:59:23 get@https://colab.research.google.co...gpu72_tf.ipynb:94:25 get@https://colab.research.google.co...gpu72_tf.ipynb:50:25 get@https://colab.research.google.co...gpu72_tf.ipynb:36:25 get@https://colab.research.google.co...gpu72_tf.ipynb:37:25 I_@https://colab.research.google.com...ymer_binary.js?vrz=colab-20191025-092551-RC00_276702382:2519:66 Ida/<@https://colab.research.google.com/v2/external/external_polymer_binary.js?vrz=colab-20191025-092551-RC00_276702382:2562:424 za@https://colab.research.google.com...ymer_binary.js?vrz=colab-20191025-092551-RC00_276702382:12:336 xa.prototype.next_@https://colab.res...ymer_binary.js?vrz=colab-20191025-092551-RC00_276702382:10:453 Ba/this.next@https://colab.research.google.com/v2/external/external_polymer_binary.js?vrz=colab-20191025-092551-RC00_276702382:13:206 b@https://colab.research.google.com/...ymer_binary.js?vrz=colab-20191025-092551-RC00_276702382:22:43 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
28D616 Posts |
![]() Quote:
But... No errors such as you're reporting. A couple of thoughts... I do remember Google presents a warning message when running the GPU72_TF Section for the first time. Something along the lines of "Google didn't author this -- be sure you review and trust it before running". Perhaps you didn't acknowledge that? Alternatively, rather than cloning from Github, you can also just copy-and-paste the code from the GPU72 "View Note Access Key" -> "Notebook Access Key" page into a new Colab and/or Kaggle Notebook. Remember that both Colab and Kaggle are very particular about the copy-and-paste. You can't just highlight the code, and then middle-button-click. You have to highlight, then "Cntl-C", then "Cntl-V" into the Notebook Section. Please let us know if either of the above resolves your issue. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Oct 2019
100012 Posts |
![]()
It always displays the message "Google didn't authorize etc etc" and I always press "Run anyways" so I don't think that is the problem. Just tried to copy and paste the code from the Notebooks Acces Keys section but Colab is still displaying the same error.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2·5,227 Posts |
![]() Quote:
That's meant to be funny, and serious, at the same time... Perhaps try fulling exiting from your browser, and restarting. I can't think of a reason a full reboot would be needed, but if a browser reset doesn't help, perhaps try going to Settings, and flush your cache. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Oct 2019
218 Posts |
![]()
Tried to exit Firefox and then run Colab but it still displays the same error. Not weirdly, it seems to work fine using Chrome, it must have to do with the dozen addons I installed yesterday. I'm going to try to disable them one at a time and see which one is causing problems. Will let you know if I can figure this out.
EDIT: Just found the problem: the addon "Trace" was somehow preventing the cell from running, now that I jave disabled it Colab works fine, thank you guys for your help! Last fiddled with by David703 on 2019-10-28 at 17:12 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2·5,227 Posts |
![]() Quote:
It's our pleasure to help with stuff like this. It's an important way to find the "edge-cases" of our code. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Oct 2019
17 Posts |
![]()
Sounds great! I would like to ask just another thing. Out of sheer curiosity: how come trial factoring a number in the 97M exponent range from 2^74 to 2^75 "costs" around 40GHz-days while an exponent in the 63M range still from 2^74 to 2^75 costs 60? Why, in general, is the TF algorithm that we run slower with lower exponents?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22·3·877 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Oct 2019
17 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Jan 2019
Florida
24110 Posts |
![]()
Just got assigned 2 Tesla P100s on 2 different accounts!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Jan 2019
Florida
24110 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |