mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2005-04-16, 21:48   #1
georgekh
 
georgekh's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

2×33 Posts
Talking Vapochill LS

hey everyone!!! i just bought a Vapochill LS and i will be cranking up the speed out of my 3.2c to around 4.5ghz and i will post some benchmarks!!!!
I cant wait, if anyone else has some extreme overclocks or extreme cooling then please let us know.

PS: cant wait to this things muscle!!!
georgekh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-04-17, 19:17   #2
georgekh
 
georgekh's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

5410 Posts
Default

also, since i allready have a 3.2 northwood, i'm getting a 3.2 prescott and i'm having trouble deciding which one i should stick to my vapochill, i want to know which one is better for prime95, the 3.2 northwood overclocked or prescott overclocked. thanks
georgekh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-04-17, 22:02   #3
moo
 
moo's Avatar
 
Jul 2004
Nowhere

809 Posts
Default

northwood prescot is a waste of cooling power and should have never become avaible to public.
moo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-04-17, 23:30   #4
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

2×32×83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moo
northwood prescot is a waste of cooling power and should have never become avaible to public.
I think you mean simply "prescott", the core that replaced northwood...
In fact Prescott is good to warm your room in winter, and Northwood is definitely better for Prime95.
I have a 3,2GHz Northwood overclocked to 3.5 GHz (air cooled) and I would really like to know how far you will be able to go with Vapochill. Don´t forget that for really "serious" OC you should also keep an eye on the memories and the chipset, as they are also prone to heat a lot.
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-04-18, 21:19   #5
moo
 
moo's Avatar
 
Jul 2004
Nowhere

14518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycorn
I think you mean simply "prescott", the core that replaced northwood...
In fact Prescott is good to warm your room in winter, and Northwood is definitely better for Prime95.
I have a 3,2GHz Northwood overclocked to 3.5 GHz (air cooled) and I would really like to know how far you will be able to go with Vapochill. Don´t forget that for really "serious" OC you should also keep an eye on the memories and the chipset, as they are also prone to heat a lot.
i know that i forgot a , and the and a and

northwood, the prescot is a waste of cooling and power and should have never become avaible to public.
Yesterday 02:17 PM
moo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-04-19, 12:55   #6
Peter Nelson
 
Peter Nelson's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

52910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moo
i know that i forgot a , and the and a and

northwood, the prescot is a waste of cooling and power and should have never become avaible to public.
Yesterday 02:17 PM
I understood what you meant, moo, although the punctuation helps!

Northwoods are better than Prescott in most ways if you have a choice. eg for throughput in P95 at identical speeds.

If I had such a cooler I would probably stick it on the northwood too.
Peter Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-04-20, 02:02   #7
georgekh
 
georgekh's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

2·33 Posts
Default

ok i think i'll stick with the NW then and i'll stick the prescott in my older machine
georgekh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-05-02, 12:55   #8
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

2×32×83 Posts
Default

Any benchies yet?
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-05-07, 04:31   #9
georgekh
 
georgekh's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

2·33 Posts
Default

i will post benchies for a 3.2 or a 3.4 Northwood in a bout a few weeks.
georgekh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-01, 15:04   #10
georgekh
 
georgekh's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

2×33 Posts
Default

my project has been set back a few weeks because my video card is not in stock right now but i decided finally to go for another 3.2c and it turns out that i got a 30 capacitor one so from what i hear its supposedly supposed to be an EE but something went wrong so they jsut sold it as a northwood so what this means that it might be a gallatin core but i doubt it but these chips overclock much better then the normal northwoods!!!!
georgekh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-29, 15:22   #11
georgekh
 
georgekh's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

2·33 Posts
Default

Here is my unoverclocked bench mark

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 3198.55 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 11.641 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 13.863 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 15.818 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 18.956 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 23.070 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 27.199 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 30.467 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 40.081 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 49.231 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 58.714 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 66.277 ms.

Now here is a benchmark from my older overclock

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 3647.76 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 10.021 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 11.924 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 13.648 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 16.404 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 19.984 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 23.556 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.338 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 34.603 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 42.372 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 50.425 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 57.149 ms.

Now here is my benchmark from my new overclock using my Vapochill

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 4000.24 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 8.993 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 10.709 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 12.282 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 14.588 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 17.823 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 21.062 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 23.482 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 30.757 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 37.927 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 45.061 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 50.789 ms.
georgekh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 17:07.


Fri Oct 22 17:07:38 UTC 2021 up 91 days, 11:36, 1 user, load averages: 1.54, 1.45, 1.49

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.