mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Operation Billion Digits

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-02-01, 11:27   #529
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

2,437 Posts
Default

no factor for M3321934051 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934129 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934163 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934193 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934199 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934241 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934243 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934537 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934697 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934757 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-01, 12:29   #530
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

243710 Posts
Default

and a third in a row reply
no factor for M3321929929 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32] took 48 minutes
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-01, 13:50   #531
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

112408 Posts
Default

M3321934471 : no (more) factors from 68 bits to 69 bits.

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-01, 16:15   #532
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

25·149 Posts
Default

All factored exponents have been taken to 69 bits.

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-02, 11:25   #533
gjmccrac
 
gjmccrac's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Ontario, Canada

3·43 Posts
Default

I have done a bunch of work on the exponents in the 3321935xxx range.

attached is a zipped excel file of bit level progress and factors found.

Grant
Attached Files
File Type: zip OBD_M3321935xxx.zip (6.1 KB, 110 views)
gjmccrac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-02, 12:14   #534
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

25×149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gjmccrac View Post
I have done a bunch of work on the exponents in the 3321935xxx range.

attached is a zipped excel file of bit level progress and factors found.

Grant
That range has not yet been releaased. Moreover, Uncwilly and I altready did some testing on the first numbers of the new range, so I warmly ask not to waste CPU cycles on them unless the new range is released, to avoid resource overlapping.

Of course, your work will be kept, and added to the DB as soon as the new range is released.

Thank you

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-02, 15:02   #535
Rodrigo
 
Rodrigo's Avatar
 
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania

32×103 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firejuggler View Post
no factor for M3321929929 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32] took 48 minutes
firejuggler,

48 minutes to go from 75 bits to 76 -- what kind of computer (CPU) are you using?

Rodrigo
Rodrigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-02, 15:11   #536
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

2,437 Posts
Default

as a CPU? a core 2 duo 8300.
Mfaktc use GPU. A GTX 460, in that case.

Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2011-02-02 at 15:12
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-03, 05:33   #537
Rodrigo
 
Rodrigo's Avatar
 
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania

16378 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firejuggler View Post
as a CPU? a core 2 duo 8300.
Mfaktc use GPU. A GTX 460, in that case.
firejuggler,

Thanks for the info (and for clarifying that it's the GPU, as I don't use mfaktc).

Very impressive!!

Let me see if I get this. I understand (and my own PC's experience suggests) that the general pattern is that it takes about twice as much time to go from one bit level to the next, as it did to get to that bit level from the previous one. So if it takes your GPU 48 minutes to get from 75 to 76, then it's 96 minutes to go to 77, 192 for 78, 384 for 79, 768 for 80, 1536 for 81, and 3072 minutes (more or less) to reach 82 bits.

Add these minutes up and it would take you (give or take) 6096 minutes, or just over four days, to take an exponent from 75 to 82 bits.

Now, consider that OBD Level 16 (http://www.moregimps.it/billion/pietre.php) is 16 exponents at 82 bits. This means that, in a little over two months, you could take OBD to Level 16 all by yourself!

Corrections to the figures are welcome, of course -- but I'm less interested in the exact calculation than in whether this projection is anywhere in the ballpark, and its significance. There is always the real possibility that I will prove, yet again, that I made the right decision back in high school when I pursued the liberal-arts track.

Rodrigo
Rodrigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-03, 08:24   #538
lavalamp
 
lavalamp's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
London, UK

24348 Posts
Default

In reality though, 1 candidate is already at 82 bits, and there are 14 candidates at 81 bits, and 16 candidates at 80 bits.

Taking one of the 80 bit candidates to 81 bits, and then taking all the 81's to 82 would take 47,616 minutes or 33 days, assuming no factors are found along the way. There is approximately a 17.84% chance that a factor would be found.
lavalamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-03, 10:30   #539
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

243710 Posts
Default

and here is a bunch of expo to 76
Code:
no factor for M3321929971 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930173 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930211 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930229 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930323 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930347 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930349 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930371 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930397 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930439 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930461 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930517 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930613 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930977 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931043 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931057 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931099 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931163 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934909 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What does * represent on Recent Results report? petrw1 PrimeNet 5 2018-07-09 21:14
Report for PRP houding PrimeNet 15 2018-01-10 19:24
How to report GPU results dcorbit Information & Answers 4 2012-08-13 21:53
How to report P-1 results James Heinrich Marin's Mersenne-aries 6 2004-05-27 05:47
Bug report remaker Software 4 2002-10-17 08:18

All times are UTC. The time now is 06:23.

Wed Oct 28 06:23:29 UTC 2020 up 48 days, 3:34, 2 users, load averages: 1.66, 1.56, 1.51

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.