20160828, 00:32  #1 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
1011001001101_{2} Posts 
MultiFactorial Prime Search
The new Multifactorial search page can be found here. This is a site run by Marian Otremba. Please work with him if you want to participate in the search.
My page will still be available for a while but I won't be making updates. Once I complete the search on 7! to 600,000 I will likely take it down. Last fiddled with by rogue on 20181230 at 16:22 
20160909, 01:13  #2 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
3×11×173 Posts 
I have verified that primes are missing from Ken's site for various types. Sigh! I have only tested for b < 8000 so far. Hopefully nothing larger is missing.
Last fiddled with by rogue on 20161014 at 21:59 
20160909, 02:04  #3 
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
1737_{10} Posts 
Are there any ranges you'd like help on?

20160909, 13:35  #4 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
3·11·173 Posts 
There seem to be a gap with n=16. If you want to sieve and test from 100001!16 thru 210000!16 (or further) that would be great.

20160909, 20:22  #5 
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
3^{2}·193 Posts 
No problem. I'll get start with n=16 from b=100001 to 210000.
Edit: Sorry, dumb question time. How do I start a new search? Do I need to set up a PFGW ABC file first? Last fiddled with by wombatman on 20160909 at 20:26 
20160910, 11:27  #6  
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
3·11·173 Posts 
Quote:
Use M16 n10e4 N21e4 P1e14 m1e14 omf16.out. You will want to vary t (# of threads) and C (# of chunks) to find the optimal performance. Before you start run a PRP test for a 180000!16+1 (or thereabouts). You will want to sieve until the removal rate is slower than the time for that PRP test. Note that if you have multiple threads, then you will have to adjust the removal rate accordingly. Last fiddled with by rogue on 20160910 at 11:32 

20160910, 12:16  #7 
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
3311_{8} Posts 
I'm ashamed to admit that I did use h and misunderstood what it was telling me...
Thanks for the instructions. 
20160912, 18:45  #8 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
3×11×173 Posts 
I have more bad news. For the two types I ran up to 100,000 I found missing primes for one of those types for n > 50,000. That combined with what I already knew was missing means that about 25 percent of the ranges listed on his site are missing primes and that is only on the small range of numbers I have retested. It appears that it will take me a number of months to rerun everything. If anyone else wants to throw their hat into the ring, I would appreciate it. I will try to get my new webpage up later today.
Note that I'm not blaming Ken in any way. His webpage is based upon what others have reported to him. There is no way for him to know that results submitted to him are wrong. Last fiddled with by rogue on 20161014 at 21:59 
20160922, 22:22  #9 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
3×11×173 Posts 
I have some good news. Now that OpenCL is working again fn my iMac, I can get back to an OpenCL version of the sieve. So far the testing is going smoothly, but I have further to go.

20160929, 18:35  #10 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
164D_{16} Posts 
I have more bad news. I have tested to over 40,000 on each of the types. Of the 24 I'm testing, 17 are missing primes with a total of 21 of 48 with missing primes when including both + and .
Right now I'm focused on type 2 up to 100,000. Although there is nothing missing from that type, the problems I've seen with the other types force me to retest it. Hopefully that will complete by the end of October, but it is difficult to gauge how long it will take because of how quickly the numbers get larger. Last fiddled with by rogue on 20161014 at 22:00 
20160929, 19:14  #11 
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT)
13035_{8} Posts 
It sounds like it may be more sensible just to start over.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Twin prime search?  MooooMoo  Twin Prime Search  115  20100829 17:38 
Prime Search at School  Unregistered  Information & Answers  5  20091015 22:44 
k=51 or about coordinated prime search  Kosmaj  Riesel Prime Search  7  20070713 22:15 
Prime Search on PS3?  Kosmaj  Riesel Prime Search  6  20061121 15:19 
Prime Search forum  geoff  Forum Feedback  3  20060726 03:17 