mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > No Prime Left Behind

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-06-01, 16:25   #34
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

102538 Posts
Default

k=349 and 353 are at n=1.2M.
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-21, 10:49   #35
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

24×52×7 Posts
Default

I've updated the k=300-2000 page on rieselprime.de with the data from here.

I also included a new page for the Mini Drive #4 (315, 321, 327, 333, 339, 345) and updated the Individual-page.
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-26, 05:14   #36
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

97716 Posts
Default

k=311 done [1600k-2000k]
k=303 done [1000k-1500k]
k=303 ~75% done [1500k-2000k]

No primes, results are sent via email.
I would like to reserve k=301 and k=305.
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-27, 08:37   #37
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

7×1,447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unconnected View Post
I would like to reserve k=301 and k=305.
I have now Emailed you the files for k=301 and 305. Good luck!
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-27, 10:50   #38
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

97716 Posts
Default

Thank you. Hope I'll find prime sooner or later.
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-30, 18:34   #39
Cruelty
 
Cruelty's Avatar
 
May 2005

2·809 Posts
Default Status report

k=337 tested till n=2.56M.
Cruelty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-04, 22:09   #40
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

17×251 Posts
Default

k=349 and 353 are at n=1.3M.
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-05, 22:17   #41
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

1010111100002 Posts
Default

@Gary, Max:

I've checked the results for the MiniDrive #4 (6 k's from 1M to 2M).
I've noticed, that the pair 315*2^1000000-1 was done twice!

This pair was tested with the MiniDrive #1 (same 6 k's from 600k-1M).
The resultfile "results_20090909_0001_GB_nplb_8000.txt" contains this pair.

In MiniDrive #4 it was tested again, because the n-range was/is xxx000-xxx000 instead of xxx001-xxx000.
So resultfile "results_20100519_0001_GB_nplb_3500.txt" contains this pair, too.

Please be sure to upload the range from 001-000 into the server.
Have a look at the sievefile you sent me for k=377: it contains the n-values for n=1000000 and n=2000000!

PS:
There're 3 k-values with n=1000000 in that sievefile: k=315, 377 and 383.

Last fiddled with by kar_bon on 2010-07-06 at 05:55
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-06, 07:00   #42
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

7×1,447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kar_bon View Post
@Gary, Max:

I've checked the results for the MiniDrive #4 (6 k's from 1M to 2M).
I've noticed, that the pair 315*2^1000000-1 was done twice!

This pair was tested with the MiniDrive #1 (same 6 k's from 600k-1M).
The resultfile "results_20090909_0001_GB_nplb_8000.txt" contains this pair.

In MiniDrive #4 it was tested again, because the n-range was/is xxx000-xxx000 instead of xxx001-xxx000.
So resultfile "results_20100519_0001_GB_nplb_3500.txt" contains this pair, too.

Please be sure to upload the range from 001-000 into the server.
Have a look at the sievefile you sent me for k=377: it contains the n-values for n=1000000 and n=2000000!

PS:
There're 3 k-values with n=1000000 in that sievefile: k=315, 377 and 383.

Karsten,

Is this really a big deal? I do the 1n overlap on all files that I sieve.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-06, 09:24   #43
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

1010111100002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Karsten,

Is this really a big deal? I do the 1n overlap on all files that I sieve.


Gary
Because it was your demand to all who reserve manual ranges to do the xxx001 to xxx000 range to be sure testing without losing any pair!

Anyway, no problem for me.
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-06, 11:50   #44
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

279116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kar_bon View Post
Because it was your demand to all who reserve manual ranges to do the xxx001 to xxx000 range to be sure testing without losing any pair!

Anyway, no problem for me.
??

There are 3 reasons why this does not apply here:

1. Because the 2 individual-k drives are separate drives and sieving efforts. The first individual-k drive ended at n=1M and the new one restarted from n=1M. This will not come up for n>1M.

2. The admins send people ranges with this drive and know to use xxx001 to xxx000 when sending files to people for ranges n>1M.

3. We never said anything about it in the 1st post here because of the above 2 reasons. It's only stated on drives where people are pulling subranges out of larger posted files both here and at CRUS. We only post small beginning files here.


You may remember that you made a similar statement about n=600000 for all of the various k=300 to 1001 drives. The main reason that I asked you if it's a problem for you now is that it will happen again at n=1M for other various drives. If it was creating a problem, I/we could remove all tests for n=1M in the future when we are sieving k=400-1001 for n=1M-2M but the files are so large and difficult to manipulate that's it's my preference to either (1) leave them in there (2) be very specific by sieving n=1000001 to 2000000. I guess it is just easier to sieve with -n 1e6 -N 2e6 rather than -n 1000001 -N 2e6.

As for how to handle them in the database when they are loaded: Make them a doublecheck.


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-07-06 at 11:52
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Individual overall statistics graphs Chuck GPU to 72 4 2012-08-20 23:58
Individual-k reservations k=300-400 n=600K-1M gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 403 2010-02-28 17:43
Distinquishing Team from Individual accounts strates Teams 5 2006-12-17 20:50
What is the largest individual effort currently under way? Gary Edstrom Lounge 10 2004-04-20 19:55
Individual Account Report queries shu_the_genius PrimeNet 5 2003-12-19 18:00

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:38.

Sun May 31 10:38:23 UTC 2020 up 67 days, 8:11, 1 user, load averages: 1.38, 1.61, 1.71

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.