![]() |
![]() |
#452 |
Sep 2009
23×13×19 Posts |
![]()
And the status page show the system load as:
Code:
Load average, last minute 25.69 Load average, last 5 minutes 32.11 Load average, last 15 minutes 32.41 I've had occasional timeouts and proxy errors waiting for factordb to respond as well. Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#453 |
May 2019
Rome, Italy
2×17 Posts |
![]()
I noticed the slowdowns/timeouts yesterday, and the disk usage this morning.
About the sequences, i tried looking for a short one (for example the aliquot one starting from 100) and it showed "Checked, new" as the status for all the terms (except the first). My guess is that it fails to save and/or retrieve the sequence, so regenerates the sequence each time i ask the DB to show me the sequence: this could explain why asking for certain sequences slows the DB down. Could it be that some tables in the db failed? After all, the numbers seem to be still there. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#454 |
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
27716 Posts |
![]()
Also, the graph feature on the Sequences page isn't working:
http://www.factordb.com/aliquot.php?...10&pow=2&big=1 It gives a broken image. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#455 | |
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
63110 Posts |
![]() Quote:
EDIT: Also happens with 112648156947159943866724620^8-1. EDIT2: Somehow, I ended up using 4749.4 seconds of CPU time, more than double my 2000 second limit. Please fix the problem with 112648156947159943866724620^x-1, as it wastes CPU time, even if you restart your browser. Last fiddled with by Stargate38 on 2020-10-29 at 23:40 Reason: Other related numbers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#456 |
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
23·5·11 Posts |
![]()
The sequence pages are also returning 502 errors after several minutes. By the way, the limit and help pages should be exempt from the server limits, because they're useless if you can't load them if you've exceeded your limit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#457 |
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
593 Posts |
![]()
The table which caches the sequences was marked as crashed. So the sequence table was deleted. Now on first access to a secuence the entries are recreated. This takes cpu time and many DB queries which might exceed your limit. But the second access should be fast.
It will take some time until frequently accessed sequences are recreated. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#458 | |
Sep 2008
Kansas
41×79 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#459 |
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
63110 Posts |
![]()
It appears the DB is down for a full backup. I'm glad that Syd's doing that, in case the server crashes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A suggestion for factordb. | enzocreti | FactorDB | 10 | 2021-01-05 19:49 |
Extending Factordb | carpetpool | FactorDB | 6 | 2017-01-23 11:04 |
FactorDB PRP's | smh | FactorDB | 231 | 2015-07-28 02:30 |
bugged sequence in factordb | firejuggler | Aliquot Sequences | 2 | 2010-06-15 14:03 |
FactorDB question | Raman | Factoring | 15 | 2010-01-28 10:24 |