20040223, 08:48  #1 
2×7^{4} Posts 
I've chosen primality test task, but info shows P1 factoring! Why ?
I've chosen primality test task, but info shows P1 factoring! Why ?

20040223, 11:16  #2  
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
29×167 Posts 
Quote:
If you don't want it, there is a switch to avoid P1 test. Luigi 

20040223, 13:05  #3  
2×3^{2}×5^{2}×17 Posts 
Quote:


20040223, 16:45  #4 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
2^{2}×3×641 Posts 
Although you can skip the P1 factoring if you really want to, please consider letting it proceed.
The bounds for P1 factoring are chosen to maximize GIMPS throughput. That is, on average a GIMPS participant will "clear" (prove to be composite) more exponents in a given time if the automatic P1 step is allowed to precede the LL test. It won't change your chances of finding a Mersenne prime. If P1 finds a factor, then the LL test would have found that the Mersenne number is composite but you will have saved yourself the time needed to run that LL test and can proceed to your next number assignment sooner. Also, if you skip P1 factoring before doing the LL test, then later on someone else finds a factor by doing the P1 step you skipped, you will lose GIMPS credit (on the GIMPS Top Producers list) for your LL test, although your PrimeNet credits (on the PrimeNet Top Producers list) will remain unchanged. Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 20040223 at 16:51 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing  Trilo  Miscellaneous Math  25  20180311 23:20 
LL first test shows 4 days to complete.  sr13798  Information & Answers  2  20161114 16:30 
Yet another new factoring algorithm\primality test:Digital Coding ??  tServo  Miscellaneous Math  3  20140410 18:52 
there is another way to test the primality of a no  shawn  Miscellaneous Math  5  20070717 17:55 
A primality test for Fermat numbers faster than Pépin's test ?  T.Rex  Math  0  20041026 21:37 