![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
26·31 Posts |
![]()
Hi all,
Is there a systematic method (other than brute force) to find a base whereby a given composite n will yield a false positive in FLT testing, other than n+1 and n-1 ? Does such a base exist for any given composite? Are such Bases finite in number? Thank you in advance. ![]() Last fiddled with by a1call on 2018-01-02 at 03:11 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jun 2003
23×607 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
111110000002 Posts |
![]()
Thank you for the insight axn.
Re: My 2nd question, well it certainly can't be infinite unless bases greater than n are considered. So a mute question I can see. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Aug 2006
22×1,493 Posts |
![]()
Does "FLT testing" mean the Fermat probable-prime test? I'll assume this below, otherwise please clarify the term.
![]() Quote:
If \[n = p_1^{e_1}p_2^{e_2}\cdots p_k^{e_k}\] (with p1 < p2 < ... < pk and all exponents positive integers) then there are \[\prod_{i=1}^k \gcd(p_i-1, n-1)\] bases to which n is a pseudoprime. This fits axn's comment pretty well: it's easy to see that only prime powers could have the minimum 2 bases, and p - 1 divides p^e - 1 so only powers of 3 work. As you pointed out, this question is moot -- there are only finitely many choices unless you count integers rather than integers mod n. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(Pseudo)-Mathematics in Economics | clowns789 | Miscellaneous Math | 3 | 2016-06-07 04:01 |
Pseudo-mathematical gibberings (volume 9a) | storflyt32 | storflyt32 | 81 | 2015-04-22 16:06 |
Pseudo-random maps over an elliptic curve | ColdFury | Math | 4 | 2007-05-29 21:30 |
"Prime in all bases"? | Uncwilly | Math | 10 | 2006-11-22 18:27 |
pseudo reservation of a k ... | tnerual | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 14 | 2006-11-04 08:00 |