20020831, 17:24  #1 
Aug 2002
1100101_{2} Posts 
ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS)
Hi,
I have seen a few errors in my log files at 2 different hosts, one at home and one in a rack room. Two error types: ERROR: ROUND OFF (0.4999008179) > 0.40 ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 6.671785364156798e+16 != 6.671785364161534e+16 Most are SUM. Both cases followed by Possible hardware failure, consult the readme file. Continuing from last save file. Torture for hours didnt produce any info. They all started in a very hot day. I dont know one in rack room but my home CPU was over 60c. How bad are they? 
20020831, 17:44  #2 
Aug 2002
2·3^{3} Posts 
Overheating does cause errors in CPU and memory. George wrote here http://www.teamprimerib.com/gimps/viewtopic.php?t=49, that you have a 50% change of the exponent run being invalid.
Prime95 detected that something happened when numbers went out of spec. It kept reruning from the last known good checkpoint until numbers went back into spec. The problem is the overheat may have harmed work done before that checkpoint (but didn't know it yet) and this would then carry through the rest of the WU. 
20020831, 18:36  #3 
Aug 2002
101 Posts 
RATS! 56% is much too high. Will errors be reported to primenet so it could set a flag for those exponents?
Or offer an option that when we see such an error, we start from the beginning. 
20020831, 19:47  #4 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
3^{2}×307 Posts 
Yes the errors are reported to primenet. Anyway, doublechecking ensures that only matching results are accepted.
If your CPU temp is back to normal and you have less than 50% of the exponent complete I'd say start over. Stop Prime95. Go into the P95 directory and look for two files named pxxxxxxx and qxxxxxx where the x's are numbers representing your exponent. Remove the two files and restart P95 and you should start over. 
20040102, 22:09  #5 
2^{3}·3^{2}·7·17 Posts 
lots of epsilon errors
Hi, I got all these errors (and no others) over a period of a few days.
The errors seem to all be very small; within a reasonable floatingpoint epsilon. I ran the torture test for a few hours without failures. My AMD Athlon 2700+ isn't overclocked. It's not hot here. I'm disappointed; I had hoped to be able to help with the Mersenne prime search. But, I am going to discontinue running this computation. If in fact these are epsilon errors and the results from my computer have a chance of being useful, could someone let me know? Thanks! Oliver Jones Iteration: 4592344/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 1.276158324226189e+83 != 1.27615832422619e+83 Iteration: 4691536/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 2.917352435159693e+82 != 2.917352435159695e+82 Iteration: 6706828/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 6.538809292854271e+66 != 6.538809292854284e+66 Iteration: 6791001/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 6.548121686333023e+66 != 6.548121686333019e+66 Iteration: 6841061/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 1.113625838140894e+67 != 1.113625838140895e+67 Iteration: 7264636/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 1.70034274692042e+76 != 1.700342746920419e+76 Iteration: 7499587/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 1.446904841557651e+67 != 1.44690484155765e+67 Iteration: 7622131/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 6.479168211454303e+67 != 6.479168211454303e+67 Iteration: 7635629/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 2.365930387327026e+67 != 2.365930387327026e+67 Iteration: 8828490/22024853, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS), 3.649538737865422e+83 != 3.649538737865421e+83 
20040102, 22:25  #6  
Nov 2003
3×5×11 Posts 
Re: lots of epsilon errors
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS)  AES  PrimeNet  6  20071005 18:48 
LLR SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS) error  jbristow  Software  4  20070814 04:07 
v. 2.13: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS)  Kaiw  Software  7  20051026 14:49 
SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS)  rudi_m  Software  3  20050822 15:42 
ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS)  flava  Hardware  3  20040119 17:52 