Riesel Primes k*2^n-1, k<300 [Part II] - Page 67

lsoule · 2013-10-02, 14:16

k=39 is complete from 1.7-2M. I believe I skipped up to n=1.7M because pb had completed that range.

MooMoo2 · 2013-10-02, 19:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by lsoule

k=39 is complete from 1.7-2M. I believe I skipped up to n=1.7M because pb had completed that range.

I see. Could you tell me which range(s) you skipped? From this post:
http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.ph...1&postcount=56
it seems that the only ranges searched above 1.2M were 1430024-1431453, 1652079-1706204, and 1967625-1983908.

lsoule · 2013-10-02, 20:14

I skipped k=39 from n=1.263M-1.7M.

Kosmaj · 2013-10-03, 03:12

Well, I don't know why I marked k=39 as tested to 1706k. Obviously I was under impresson that it was done up to 1652k since I was already aware of Peter's results. I remember that k=39 was unreserved for a while, I wonder had somebody else worked on it? I'll also check my private mail before we start filling the gaps in the 1263-1652 range.

pinhodecarlos · 2013-10-03, 12:03

A little of-topic but about the progress of k=3 from PrimeGrid. The status can be consulted on this page http://www.primegrid.com/stats_321_llr.php.
For k=27 and k=121 stats can be found here:

http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12006/
http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12001/

No missing primes on RPS status page, only missing the progress.

Carlos

Chaos13 · 2013-10-03, 16:23

k=213 tested to 1.3 M
No new primes. Continuing.

- Kristine

Kosmaj · 2013-10-05, 15:02

I just updated the k<300 Status page with latest updates.

I confirmed that k=39 was tested up to 1690k by Larry using our old private communication. It's now at n=2M.

I also marked new limits for k=27 and k=121. It's a pity that Paul and Justinsane chose to transfer their reservations of k=3, 27, and 121 to PrimeGrid instead to us...

MooMoo2 · 2013-10-06, 21:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kosmaj

I confirmed that k=39 was tested up to 1690k by Larry using our old private communication. It's now at n=2M.

OK then, I'll start k=39 at 2M. Thanks for checking.

Also, k=161 is complete to n=1646K with no primes found. I'm continuing, and the residues are attached.

Retep · 2013-10-27, 17:08

I'm still testing k=51. The range n = 3.5M to 3.7M is now finished.
No primes. 3.5M to 3.6M attached.

I will continue.

Retep · 2013-10-27, 17:13

3.6M to 3.7M attached (I could't get them in one post).

By the way.. my sieved file is limited to 4M. I remember PrimeGrid did some sieving, where can I find these files, in particular for k=51?

Edit: The discussion about PrimeGrid sieving (Psieve) and ABCD files moved to a new thread.

amphoria · 2013-10-31, 17:00

k=67 at n=2.67M

2013-10-03, 16:23	#732
Chaos13 Mar 2010 1100₂ Posts	k=213 tested to 1.3 M No new primes. Continuing. - Kristine Last fiddled with by Chaos13 on 2013-10-03 at 16:29

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes	KEP	Conjectures 'R Us	1081	2021-02-23 16:13
Proth and Riesel Primes	lukerichards	Number Theory Discussion Group	7	2018-01-20 16:47
Riesel primes	Primeinator	Information & Answers	12	2009-07-19 23:30
Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5: Post Primes Here	robert44444uk	Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5	358	2008-12-08 16:28
Riesel.15k.org LLRnet Primes Found!	SlashDude	15k Search	3	2004-06-14 16:07

2013-10-02, 14:16	#727
lsoule Nov 2004 California 2³×3×71 Posts	k=39 is complete from 1.7-2M. I believe I skipped up to n=1.7M because pb had completed that range.

2013-10-02, 20:14	#729
lsoule Nov 2004 California 3250₈ Posts	I skipped k=39 from n=1.263M-1.7M.

2013-10-03, 03:12	#730
Kosmaj Nov 2003 2×1,811 Posts	Well, I don't know why I marked k=39 as tested to 1706k. Obviously I was under impresson that it was done up to 1652k since I was already aware of Peter's results. I remember that k=39 was unreserved for a while, I wonder had somebody else worked on it? I'll also check my private mail before we start filling the gaps in the 1263-1652 range.

2013-10-03, 12:03	#731
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 2⁸·19 Posts	A little of-topic but about the progress of k=3 from PrimeGrid. The status can be consulted on this page http://www.primegrid.com/stats_321_llr.php. For k=27 and k=121 stats can be found here: http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12006/ http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12001/ No missing primes on RPS status page, only missing the progress. Carlos

2013-10-05, 15:02	#733
Kosmaj Nov 2003 E26₁₆ Posts	I just updated the k<300 Status page with latest updates. I confirmed that k=39 was tested up to 1690k by Larry using our old private communication. It's now at n=2M. I also marked new limits for k=27 and k=121. It's a pity that Paul and Justinsane chose to transfer their reservations of k=3, 27, and 121 to PrimeGrid instead to us...

2013-10-31, 17:00	#737
amphoria "Dave" Sep 2005 UK 2×19×73 Posts	k=67 at n=2.67M