mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-12-21, 14:33   #23
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

137508 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitf View Post
Is there a way I can set a smaller FFT on an assignment I get?
No.
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-21, 15:06   #24
nitf
 
Dec 2020

2×3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
No.
Clear and succinct, just the way I like it. :)

The takeaways I've got from this are to not be so impatient and be content with a 3.2 ms/iter on the cpu, and to let the cpu take its foot off the gas and save me ~$56 in electricity costs year round.

(142-87 = 55 watt difference, /1000 = .0.055 kilowatts, * 24 * 365 = 481.8 kwh/yr, * $0.116116 rate= $55.94)

Last fiddled with by nitf on 2020-12-21 at 15:08
nitf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-21, 16:45   #25
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

10011001101012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitf View Post
DDR4 PC4-25600 3200MHz.
Can you buy/get some 3600 (or 4000) sticks? Or alternately, can you try changing the FCLK to higher frequency?
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-21, 18:33   #26
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

3·1,579 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitf View Post
Clear and succinct, just the way I like it. :)
FFT size is, roughly speaking, the level of precision for the main calculation loop in the program. The precision needed is determined by the size of the number being operated on; the program has been optimized and tested such that the FFT chosen is reliable, but the next-smaller one introduces unacceptable chances of error in the calculation.

So, you can go *bigger* FFT and the calculation works, but you can't go smaller.

As for your conclusion about your CPU- yes. If your BIOS allows you to take axn's advice, you can get a little more speed out of it (perhaps without adding much or any wattage). Prime95's performance is mostly limited by how fast it can get data (memory and cache bandwidth), rather than how fast the chip computes the data (clock speed of CPU).
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-23, 01:20   #27
nitf
 
Dec 2020

2×3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
Can you buy/get some 3600 (or 4000) sticks? Or alternately, can you try changing the FCLK to higher frequency?
I swapped out for 3600 (2x16 DDR4-3600 PC4-28800 CL16) and that brings me down to ~2.8 (anywhere from 2.775 to 2.95, with 25k iterations between screen output) ms/iter on the same exponent as before. Next step would be to fiddle with the fabric clock but I may coast a bit and enjoy this improvement for an assignment or two first.

Thanks everyone for your help.
nitf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-24, 02:15   #28
dcheuk
 
dcheuk's Avatar
 
Jan 2019
Tallahassee, FL

25710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitf View Post
I swapped out for 3600 (2x16 DDR4-3600 PC4-28800 CL16) and that brings me down to ~2.8 (anywhere from 2.775 to 2.95, with 25k iterations between screen output) ms/iter on the same exponent as before. Next step would be to fiddle with the fabric clock but I may coast a bit and enjoy this improvement for an assignment or two first.

Thanks everyone for your help.
I found that tinkering with primary and secondary timing helps too.
dcheuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-24, 02:16   #29
dcheuk
 
dcheuk's Avatar
 
Jan 2019
Tallahassee, FL

257 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitf View Post
I swapped out for 3600 (2x16 DDR4-3600 PC4-28800 CL16) and that brings me down to ~2.8 (anywhere from 2.775 to 2.95, with 25k iterations between screen output) ms/iter on the same exponent as before. Next step would be to fiddle with the fabric clock but I may coast a bit and enjoy this improvement for an assignment or two first.

Thanks everyone for your help.
You might have better luck with the fabric clock - I wasn't able to get my system stable at >3600mhz memory clock + >1800mhz fclk 1:1 ratio with any memory kits lol.
dcheuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there any sensible auxiliary task for HT logical cores when physical cores already used for PRP? hansl Information & Answers 5 2019-06-17 14:07
LL speed vs cores danmur Hardware 28 2018-05-06 06:09
laptop reporting wrong clock speed to PrimeNet ixfd64 Hardware 1 2008-10-19 03:20
Mprime is faster on lower CPU clock speed drewster1829 Hardware 6 2008-07-17 13:43
Adding RAM with different clock speed(bad idea?) jasong Hardware 8 2006-10-25 10:05

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:59.

Sun Apr 18 13:59:00 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 8:39, 0 users, load averages: 2.34, 2.08, 2.12

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.