![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×5,171 Posts |
![]()
1663*2^356015-1 is prime
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Jan 2006
deep in a while-loop
2·7·47 Posts |
![]()
Hundreds of them:
http://stats.ironbits.net/statsnew/p...st.php?a=reset updated every hour - it will drive the mailer Last fiddled with by AMDave on 2009-01-19 at 15:18 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
3×7×53 Posts |
![]()
1577*2^356616-1 is prime!
confirmed |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
![]()
1671*2^357110-1 is prime.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2·5,171 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I meant new, as in reportable top-5000 primes, on the 8th drive. I assume that the mailer knows not to send Emails on port 9000. Thanks, Gary |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×5,171 Posts |
![]()
1517*2^356384-1 is confirmed prime
1617*2^356462-1 is prime 1487*2^356506-1 is confirmed prime 1623*2^356936-1 is prime ![]() Very odd: Where'd all the k=1700-2000 primes go on the 8th drive? On the entire drive, we've had a total of 2 new primes and 1 confirmed prime for that range. For k=1400-1700, we've had multitudes of them. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-01-20 at 00:17 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×5,171 Posts |
![]()
1403*2^359146-1 is confirmed prime
1609*2^359209-1 is prime I think k=1700-2000 is a nearly barren range! For n=350K to the current processing limit, we have: 23 total primes for k=1400-1700 3 total primes for k=1700-2000 This includes confirmed primes so is not biased by previous searching in any way. As Chris is fond of me saying: Primes are very strange! ![]() Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
1000000111012 Posts |
![]() Quote:
This sort of thing used to drive me nuts when I would do (semi)fixed n tests. Five primes for one n, then none for the next etc. Last fiddled with by Flatlander on 2009-01-20 at 21:46 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000011001102 Posts |
![]()
1785*2^359725-1 is confirmed prime
We've completed n=350K-360K minus some stragglers. The unofficial final count is: k=1400-1700 23 primes k=1700-2000 4 primes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×5,171 Posts |
![]()
1625*2^361306-1 is prime
This is getting stranger by the minute: Now, in addition to the previous ridiculous ratio of k=1400-1700 vs. 1700-2000 primes, we have an unbelievable 9 CONSECUTIVE NEW primes for k=1600-1700!! Although this is a little biased towards the k=1600-1700 and 1800-2000 ranges that have had little searching done on them...9 consecutive in a k=100 range? Come on, what's going on here? Where are the k=1800-2000 primes as well as others from many k's that haven't been searched for k=1400-1600 & 1700-1800? Counting all primes to remove any bias from ones previously found, since n=350K, we now have: Code:
k-value # primes 1400-1500 6 1500-1600 6 1600-1700 12 1700-1800 2 1800-1900 0 1900-2000 2 Not only are primes strange, they can be downright bizarre! It's things like this that lead one to conclude that primes are not random and is a large part of the reason that we search huge ranges of k and n all at once...to ultimately help decipher the "code" of primes. ![]() Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-01-21 at 08:06 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
![]()
What's the average weight (or combined weight or something) of the k's in 1600-1700 vs the other k=100 ranges? Also, I'd bet that if somebody worked the math out, this is bound to happen some time or another, just like GIMPS's two primes two weeks apart, which seems impossibly unlikely, but it worked out to be a decent probability over as much time as GIMPS has been around and assuming 1 prime/year (which they shouldn't 'expect', by prime heuristics, but they seem to be in a dense area of Mersennes).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Report top-5000 primes here | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 919 | 2021-04-03 14:12 |
Report top-5000 primes for all k<=1001 | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 1499 | 2021-03-30 22:04 |
All top 5000 primes will have the same number of digits in 2014 ;-) | Batalov | Conjectures 'R Us | 10 | 2013-03-29 01:29 |
Misc. reserves/statuses/primes for k>2000 & k=1003 | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 113 | 2009-07-30 22:32 |
Twenty Oldest Primes on Top 5000 List | masser | Lounge | 9 | 2008-08-27 12:31 |