![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Jan 2013
22·7 Posts |
![]()
Would it make sense to add a new work type "do nothing"?
I find that I occassionally want to start some work manually. One way is to add a new section to worktodo (and tell prime95 that there is another worker). The problem is that I don't want that new worker to get anything new from Primenet once it completes. Another option is to add something to the top of a worktodo section, but that can cause a long delay in resuming work that was already started by that worker. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
32·1,117 Posts |
![]()
What you want to do then is to go to Menu/Option/Preferences and set the "Days of work to queue up" to 0.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Jan 2013
22×7 Posts |
![]()
That would stall all of the workers on the machine, rather than just the new one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
52·211 Posts |
![]()
I believe the default for Prime95 is to stop searching a bit range once TF finds a factor.
With MFAKTC we have the option to stop or finish the range. I understand that this report now indicates via (*) if the complete range was done. https://www.mersenne.org/report_recent_cleared/ However the GhzDays credit is solely based on the size of the factor found whether the bit range was finished or not. I propose that IF the entire bit range is factored then credit be awarded for the entire bit range regardless of the size of the factor. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Feature request | TheMawn | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-06-17 02:32 |
Feature request | JuanTutors | Software | 22 | 2013-03-11 19:23 |
Feature Request | Uncwilly | Software | 0 | 2008-03-06 21:07 |
Feature Request | moo | Software | 24 | 2005-11-26 22:08 |
Feature request | JuanTutors | Software | 2 | 2005-07-04 22:02 |