mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2017-04-02, 01:54 #1387 nofaith628     Feb 2017 2×17 Posts I took these: Code: 54201487 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=54201487,73,1 54697597 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=54697597,73,1 54702709 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=54702709,73,1 55716697 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=55716697,73,1 56104721 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=56104721,73,1 56664947 2 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=56664947,73,1 56669819 2 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=56669819,73,1 57103121 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=57103121,73,1 57115549 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=57115549,73,1 57753071 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=57753071,73,1 That leaves every exponent above 60M not taken.
 2017-04-02, 02:25 #1388 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 29×101 Posts I'm also going to TF 102141577 to 78 as it needs it. Last fiddled with by Mark Rose on 2017-04-02 at 02:25
2017-04-02, 06:15   #1389
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

CD316 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose I'm also going to TF 102141577 to 78 as it needs it.
Cool. Yeah, I figured that large one is in no immediate need of a strategic double check anyway, but figured I'd include it just to be thorough.

2017-04-03, 00:27   #1390
Jayder

Dec 2012

1000101102 Posts

Taking those free below 70M:
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 61999547 2 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=61999547,74,1 62026201 2 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=62026201,74,1 62089483 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62089483,74,1 62121461 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62121461,74,1 62132173 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62132173,74,1 63613633 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=63613633,74,1 67982251 4 2 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=67982251,74,1 69072589 4 2 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=69072589,74,1 69675829 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=69675829,75,1

 2017-04-10, 15:23 #1391 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 63238 Posts Here's another small list... I may work up a larger list in the next day or so. There's a particular system with 20 or so solo-checked exponents in the 50-60M range that has a lifetime bad/good of something like 3.2, so I'm going to look at it on a monthly or maybe annual period of time to see if it's specific to certain time frames, or just randomly bad. Anyway, here's what I have for now... Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 44732851 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=44732851,72,1 47843413 5 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47843413,72,1 48007301 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48007301,72,1 48095939 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48095939,72,1 60137047 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=60137047,74,1 63135973 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=63135973,74,1 65406479 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=65406479,74,1 67612459 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=67612459,74,1 69103981 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=69103981,74,1
 2017-04-10, 15:46 #1392 Prime95 P90 years forever!     Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 11100100011012 Posts I took these: Code: 44732851 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=44732851,72,1 47843413 5 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47843413,72,1 48007301 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48007301,72,1 48095939 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48095939,72,1 My aging Macbook Pro appreciates the smaller exponents.
 2017-04-10, 17:32 #1393 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 1011011100012 Posts I took the others.
 2017-04-11, 00:28 #1394 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 292910 Posts There are still a bunch of higher exponents needing a DC: DoubleCheck=70092619,75,1 DoubleCheck=70161713,75,1 DoubleCheck=70832389,75,1 DoubleCheck=71086529,75,1 DoubleCheck=71172973,75,1 DoubleCheck=71425229,75,1 DoubleCheck=72246919,75,1 DoubleCheck=72502609,75,1 DoubleCheck=73172117,75,1 DoubleCheck=73749323,75,1 DoubleCheck=74745511,75,1 DoubleCheck=75295921,75,1 DoubleCheck=75297433,75,1 DoubleCheck=75854473,75,1 DoubleCheck=76096117,75,1 DoubleCheck=76535383,75,1 DoubleCheck=76763689,75,1 DoubleCheck=76809221,75,1 DoubleCheck=76995497,75,1 DoubleCheck=77042887,75,1 DoubleCheck=77158759,75,1 DoubleCheck=77162959,75,1 DoubleCheck=77171453,75,1 DoubleCheck=77429719,75,1 DoubleCheck=77486203,75,1 DoubleCheck=78207133,75,1 DoubleCheck=78212821,75,1 DoubleCheck=78217757,75,1 DoubleCheck=78232829,75,1 DoubleCheck=78251143,75,1 DoubleCheck=78313519,75,1 DoubleCheck=78830501,75,1 DoubleCheck=79105139,75,1 "fake primes": DoubleCheck=73601597,75,1 DoubleCheck=75915529,75,1 DoubleCheck=76044851,75,1 DoubleCheck=76044887,75,1 DoubleCheck=76888337,75,1 DoubleCheck=76981741,75,1 DoubleCheck=76981937,75,1 DoubleCheck=77131357,75,1 DoubleCheck=77205589,75,1 DoubleCheck=77208421,75,1 DoubleCheck=77256713,75,1 DoubleCheck=77344859,75,1 DoubleCheck=77391121,75,1 DoubleCheck=77505401,75,1 DoubleCheck=78121339,75,1 DoubleCheck=79781327,75,1 DoubleCheck=79788043,75,1
 2017-04-11, 09:11 #1395 Jayder     Dec 2012 2·139 Posts Taking all of the "fake primes" from the post above this one. Last fiddled with by Jayder on 2017-04-11 at 09:15
 2017-04-12, 11:14 #1396 nofaith628     Feb 2017 1000102 Posts Thank you very much kind sir I'll be grabbing these :) Code: DoubleCheck=71086529,75,1 DoubleCheck=71172973,75,1 DoubleCheck=71425229,75,1 DoubleCheck=72246919,75,1 DoubleCheck=72502609,75,1 DoubleCheck=73172117,75,1 DoubleCheck=73749323,75,1 DoubleCheck=74745511,75,1 DoubleCheck=75295921,75,1 DoubleCheck=75297433,75,1 DoubleCheck=75854473,75,1 Edit: Looks like someone is already working on these three: Code: DoubleCheck=70092619,75,1 DoubleCheck=70161713,75,1 DoubleCheck=70832389,75,1 Last fiddled with by nofaith628 on 2017-04-12 at 11:19
2017-04-12, 19:20   #1397
rudi_m

Jul 2005

2·7·13 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose There are still a bunch of higher exponents needing a DC:
Speaking for me and maybe for others too, the higher exponents (say >70M) are not really interesting for me. To increase the "strategic double checking throughput" you need to give us more smaller ones ;)

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 50 2017-10-30 19:16 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:10.

Sun Jan 24 16:10:39 UTC 2021 up 52 days, 12:21, 0 users, load averages: 4.78, 4.56, 4.31