mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Miscellaneous Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-07-10, 04:26   #1
devarajkandadai
 
devarajkandadai's Avatar
 
May 2004

31610 Posts
Default A tentative question

There seems to be no non-residues higher than quadratic order;is this related to Fermat's last theorem?

Last fiddled with by devarajkandadai on 2020-07-10 at 04:37
devarajkandadai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-10, 13:01   #2
Happy5214
 
Happy5214's Avatar
 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City

2·33·7 Posts
Default

If I'm understanding you right, you're saying there are no, say, cubic non-residues. Well 4 is a cubic non-residue modulo 7 (there is no x where x^3=4 (mod 7)).
Happy5214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-10, 14:02   #3
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy5214 View Post
If I'm understanding you right, you're saying there are no, say, cubic non-residues. Well 4 is a cubic non-residue modulo 7 (there is no x where x^3=4 (mod 7)).
Exercise for the O.P.

If p = 1 mod 6, how many cubic residues does it have? how many non-residues?
What about p = -1 mod 6? Did you bother at all to even try to answer your own question?

Do us all a favor. Don't come back until you take the time to actually do some reading
about this subject. And if you can't be bothered, then don't come back at all.

Your question could have been answered with 15 seconds of thought. But of course
you could not be bothered.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-10, 14:07   #4
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

10110011011102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy5214 View Post
If I'm understanding you right, you're saying there are no, say, cubic non-residues. Well 4 is a cubic non-residue modulo 7 (there is no x where x^3=4 (mod 7)).
Exercise for the O.P.

If p = 1 mod 6, how many cubic residues does it have? how many non-residues?
What about p = -1 mod 6? Did you bother at all to even try to answer your own question?

Do us all a favor. Don't come back until you take the time to actually do some reading
about this subject. And if you can't be bothered, then don't come back at all.

Your question could have been answered with 15 seconds of thought. But of course
you could not be bothered.
I think you quoted the wrong person.
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-10, 15:13   #5
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
I think you quoted the wrong person.
Huh? I did not quote anyone. I simply made a follow-on post. My post was addressed
to the O.P.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-10, 16:34   #6
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

10,267 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Huh? I did not quote anyone. I simply made a follow-on post. My post was addressed
to the O.P.
You quoted Happy5214 in the same way I'm quoting you.

You clicked on the "Quote" button, not the "Post Reply" button.

Technical point in that your text clearly addressed the OP, not the person you quoted in the technical sense.

Last fiddled with by xilman on 2020-07-10 at 16:34
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-10, 22:38   #7
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
You quoted Happy5214 in the same way I'm quoting you.

You clicked on the "Quote" button, not the "Post Reply" button.

Technical point in that your text clearly addressed the OP, not the person you quoted in the technical sense.
Point taken. This has become an interesting debate over the word "quote".

What I wrote was a follow-on. It was suggested by Happy5214 that the O.P. check whether
4 mod 7 was a cubic residue. I simply extended this to other primes that were:
firstly 1 Mod 6 (as 7 is) and then to all other primes. [And added some admonishment.]


From now on I will try to use the "post reply" button instead of "quote" to avoid confusion when I do not
intend to quote anything.

Last fiddled with by R.D. Silverman on 2020-07-10 at 22:45 Reason: some word changes
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-10, 22:45   #8
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

2·32·11·29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
This has become an interesting debate over the word "quote".
I have copied (some of) your text and placed into a box above. That is a quote of what you said. You didn't write my post, I wrote it, so I quoted you.
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-10, 23:58   #9
mathwiz
 
Mar 2019

1348 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Do us all a favor. Don't come back until you take the time to actually do some reading
about this subject. And if you can't be bothered, then don't come back at all.

Your question could have been answered with 15 seconds of thought. But of course
you could not be bothered.
I am quoting R.D. Silverman, but addressing the moderators here:

Why is this sort of rude, insulting tone permitted on the forums? Certainly this vitriol and condescension discourages people from asking questions and thereby learning. Even if the answers may be trivially obvious to Mr. Silverman, they are not to others.
mathwiz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-11, 00:51   #10
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

164448 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathwiz View Post
I am quoting R.D. Silverman, but addressing the moderators here:

Why is this sort of rude, insulting tone permitted on the forums? Certainly this vitriol and condescension discourages people from asking questions and thereby learning. Even if the answers may be trivially obvious to Mr. Silverman, they are not to others.
The O.P. has a very long history of crank and nonsensical posts combined with
a proven unwillingness to spend time learning anything about the subject. He also
fails to respond to questions posed to him.

Anyone who wants to ask questions needs to show that they have made at least a
minimal effort to answer the question for themselves. To do so otherwise is rude
in and of itself because it places a time requirement on others. Even a cursory
web search by the O.P. would have revealed the answer. Teachers should not
have to waste their time with students who are unwilling to do basic homework.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-11, 00:52   #11
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,127 Posts
Smile Eh... There is a button for that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathwiz View Post
I am quoting R.D. Silverman, but addressing the moderators here:

Why is this sort of rude, insulting tone permitted on the forums?.
As a purely gedanken experiment, I might submit that the opposite is also true:

Quote:
The comments like that (a comment from someone who has nothing for or against the argument and only stopped by to criticise the tone of voice in which two members who know each other for 10+ years talk to each other) - that discourages qualified answers. people who know the answers stop answering because someone will "report them", so they just stop. And then forum fills up with very helpful and kind answers from folks who don't know the answer and don't even know how to learn the answer.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A tentative definition devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 24 2018-10-29 19:34
Tentative conjecture devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 10 2018-07-22 05:38

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:43.

Thu Oct 1 22:43:59 UTC 2020 up 21 days, 19:54, 0 users, load averages: 1.90, 1.58, 1.52

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.