20220722, 12:41  #1772 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
839 Posts 
How embarrassing, I forgot to say which sequences I terminated. They were 38^19, 54^67, 41^68, and 67^74.

20220723, 10:00  #1773  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
3D7_{16} Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
This information will be carried over to the next update around the middle of August. The no matched parity sequences that end almost always do so on a small prime number, because for there to be a chance of having the parity change, the terms must be small. The no matched parity sequences that end are therefore very interesting. As for me, starting tomorrow, I will take a break already announced and I will not have access to any computer during this break. I will take advantage of it to change my mind before the great harvest and the great analysis, because in general, the period of the great analysis is trying and prevents me from sleeping well: the brain is too much in boiling ! But not yet. Before : the break ! 

20220723, 21:45  #1774 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2C7C_{16} Posts 
Have a great time on your break!
For base 1184, I have initialized all open exponents > 34 of both parities. This included two terminations. :) There were and still are quite a few downdrivers on the oppositeparity exponents. I got one of them to drop to 25 digits. 
20220725, 00:00  #1775 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2^{2}·3·13·73 Posts 
Base 1210: All oppositeparity exponents > 34 have been initialized.

20220727, 19:28  #1776 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2·3^{2}·5·41 Posts 
I'm running initialization on base 131071. The same parity exponents have been done by others to termination and NOT by me. (See other thread.)
I try to decipher all the noise in the other thread to see if I can finish initializing another base. Perhaps I could get help from EdH. 
20220727, 21:37  #1777 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2^{6}×7×11 Posts 
I could help, but I've been staying away from those three base's mixed parity sequences because I don't know exactly what JeanLuc has running while on break. From post #564 in the other thread:To me that kind of meant we should stick with the matched parity only. He may have a bunch of them queued up to complete while he is away. If he's running Aliqueit on a bunch of them, he may be expecting to upload the .elfs when he gets back.

20220727, 21:59  #1778 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2×3^{2}×5×41 Posts 
Oh! Makes me think to stay away from stepping on other toes.

20220727, 23:02  #1779 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
1001101000000_{2} Posts 
I don't know the status of base 102 and whether Gary may be looking at it, but if we follow with other small composites, would you be interested in initializing 104? I think all the smallest primes left are too big to consider right now.

20220728, 10:20  #1780 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2^{2}·3·13·73 Posts 
I won't do anything with base 102 or initializing any other new base until we know for sure what we are going to do next.

20220728, 12:03  #1781 
Sep 2008
Kansas
3690_{10} Posts 
Starting to initialize base 104.

20220728, 13:56  #1782 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
11500_{8} Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Broken aliquot sequences  fivemack  FactorDB  46  20210221 10:46 
Broken aliquot sequences  schickel  FactorDB  18  20130612 16:09 
A new theorem about aliquot sequences  garambois  Aliquot Sequences  34  20120610 21:53 
poaching aliquot sequences...  Andi47  FactorDB  21  20111229 21:11 
New article on aliquot sequences  schickel  mersennewiki  0  20081230 07:07 