mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-12-26, 02:42   #3455
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

3·23·71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xx005fs View Post
Because TF uses integer operations, which is much faster on turing than on pascal.
To be more specific, integer mutliply thruput is much higher on Turing compared to pascal.
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-26, 03:30   #3456
RobertKazan
 
Dec 2020

112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xx005fs View Post
Because TF uses integer operations, which is much faster on turing than on pascal.
Thank you for information
RobertKazan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-26, 15:31   #3457
clowns789
 
clowns789's Avatar
 
Jun 2003
The Computer

18816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolapus View Post
If anyone can compile mfaktc for cuda version 11.2 I would appreciate it.
I would as well! I'm considering a dual boot into Arch Linux to use it on my 3060 Ti in the meantime.
clowns789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-28, 05:11   #3458
DrobinsonPE
 
Aug 2020

1308 Posts
Default

I borrowed a GTX 660 from my nephew to benchmark it.

TF exp=103529149 from 74 to 75.

Windows 10:

Mfaktc-0.21.win_cuda100-2047 errored out and would not run even though the GTX 660 is a cuda 3.0 compute card and it should be supported.

Mfaktc-0.21.win_cuda80-2047 works and produces about 184 GHz-d/day.

Linux:

Mfaktc-0.21.linux64.cuda10.1 works and produces about 195 GHz-d/day.

Interesting note:

On Linux, when mfaktc first started up the .ini file was configured with GPUSieveSize=2047. Mfaktc ran at about 195 GHz-d/day but the computer was almost unusable because mfaktc was using both the GPU and CPU at almost 100%. I changed to GPUSieveSize=64 and mfkatc was then only using the GPU and ran at about 192 GHz-d/day. I incrementally increased to GPUSieveSize=256 where it ran at about 195 GHz-d/day and just started to use the CPU a little bit.

Last fiddled with by DrobinsonPE on 2020-12-28 at 05:18 Reason: grammar and formatting
DrobinsonPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-01-23, 15:40   #3459
rebirther
 
rebirther's Avatar
 
Sep 2011
Germany

276610 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJudger View Post
Finally got in touch with a RTX 3090:
Code:
mfaktc v0.22-pre8 (64bit built)
[...]
CUDA version info
  binary compiled for CUDA  11.10
  CUDA runtime version      11.10
  CUDA driver version       11.10

CUDA device info
  name                      GeForce RTX 3090
  compute capability        8.6
  max threads per block     1024
  max shared memory per MP  102400 byte
  number of multiprocessors 82
  clock rate (CUDA cores)   1755MHz
  memory clock rate:        9751MHz
  memory bus width:         384 bit
[...]
Starting trial factoring M66362159 from 2^74 to 2^75 (57.65 GHz-days)
 k_min =  142321062303420
 k_max =  284642124610180
Using GPU kernel "barrett76_mul32_gs"
Date    Time | class   Pct |   time     ETA | GHz-d/day    Sieve     Wait
Nov 01 00:21 |    0   0.1% |  0.794  12m41s |   6535.09    82485    n.a.%
Nov 01 00:21 |    4   0.2% |  0.788  12m35s |   6584.85    82485    n.a.%
Nov 01 00:21 |    9   0.3% |  0.776  12m23s |   6686.67    82485    n.a.%
[...]
Nov 01 00:35 | 4617 100.0% |  0.849   0m00s |   6111.73    82485    n.a.%
no factor for M66362159 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.22-pre8 barrett76_mul32_gs CUDA 11.10 arch 8.0] B29A657C
tf(): total time spent: 13m 28.241s
GPU clock was 1650-1680 MHz once the GPU heated up, at startup it was a bit higher.
Power consumption during the run was about 340-345 Watt as reported by nvidia-smi.

Oliver

@TheJudger: Can you provide us the mfaktc v0.22-pre8 cuda11 for windows, would help a lot of us to bring up more computing power.
rebirther is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-01, 16:19   #3460
ramgeis
 
ramgeis's Avatar
 
Apr 2013

7516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rebirther View Post
@TheJudger: Can you provide us the mfaktc v0.22-pre8 cuda11 for windows, would help a lot of us to bring up more computing power.
ramgeis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-02, 09:42   #3461
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

222168 Posts
Default

Oliver is a busy guy, he doesn't read these threads very often. You can PM him.
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-02, 21:08   #3462
TheJudger
 
TheJudger's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Mar 2005
Germany

21278 Posts
Default

Hi there,

there are absolutely no specific changes in my current devel version which was done for Ampere generation (e.g. Geforce 30xx series). In fact 0.21 runs fine on Ampere when using CUDA 11.x. I have had many issues when creating binaries for Windows, from one day to another day without changing the code I wasn't able a binary which works (guess windows update caused the change)... others had similiar issues while others can compile... I have no clue what the root cause is. Maybe it is the code, maybe it is the why the Makefile calls the compiler... I'm anoyed as hell about this (while I know it is possible that I caused the issue by myself...)!

Oliver
TheJudger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-07, 09:39   #3463
ZFR
 
ZFR's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Bray, Ireland

11×13 Posts
Default

Is there a 0.22 version available of mfaktc? The link in the opening post has only up to 0.21.
ZFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-07, 12:17   #3464
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

3,319 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZFR View Post
Is there a 0.22 version available of mfaktc? The link in the opening post has only up to 0.21.
Not yet. The developer (TheJudger, aka Oliver) has been working on v0.22 for a long time now, but as yet there is no public release.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-07, 12:24   #3465
ZFR
 
ZFR's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Bray, Ireland

8F16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
Not yet. The developer (TheJudger, aka Oliver) has been working on v0.22 for a long time now, but as yet there is no public release.
Gotcha, thanks.
ZFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mfakto: an OpenCL program for Mersenne prefactoring Bdot GPU Computing 1668 2020-12-22 15:38
The P-1 factoring CUDA program firejuggler GPU Computing 753 2020-12-12 18:07
gr-mfaktc: a CUDA program for generalized repunits prefactoring MrRepunit GPU Computing 32 2020-11-11 19:56
mfaktc 0.21 - CUDA runtime wrong keisentraut Software 2 2020-08-18 07:03
World's second-dumbest CUDA program fivemack Programming 112 2015-02-12 22:51

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:01.

Sat Apr 10 20:01:14 UTC 2021 up 2 days, 14:42, 1 user, load averages: 1.46, 1.45, 1.43

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.