![]() |
![]() |
#155 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
10011101001102 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#156 |
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
![]()
I have not had a hang with the new executable. I ran more 2560K benchmarks, since current work is using 2688K. All hangups, to my knowledge, have been with 2560K. I am now running benches from 2048K to 2560K to see if it hangs over a wider range of FFTs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#157 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2·5·503 Posts |
![]()
In my hang results, fft length varied. A lot. Part of that was where I chose to start (sometimes 1024K, sometimes 2048K, sometimes whatever length at which it hung previously), part was something else.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#158 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2×5×503 Posts |
![]()
In prime95 29.5b7 for Win64, I tried the following in worktodo
PRP=N/A,1,2,51770007,-1,73,1 It resulted in the start of a P-1 factoring run. Correcting the form to PRP=N/A,1,2,51770007,-1 and then Test, Status, it included the exponent in the count and the odds (as if it was a first test, as given in the worktodo line). PRP or LL worker windows don't indicate what sort of calculation is being done in the worker title bar updates. Starting a PRP run, it brieflly flashes PRP there and is then quickly overwritten. The window contents will scroll out of view and then out of the buffer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#159 |
Jan 2019
1 Posts |
![]()
Seem to be having an issue with a specific FFT size when running the AVX routine in the torture test - 35K has an immediate rounding error. This doesn't occur on v29.4b8, although that does use a different Mersenne number to test. See attached image, v29.4b8 is on the left with local.txt open below showing manual instruction set config, v29.5b6 is on the right, instruction set config was performed through the torture test interface by checking the "Disable AVX2" box. CPU is 7600K, so no AVX-512 support anyway.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#160 | |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
7,411 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#161 |
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
![]()
I have yet to see any problems with build 7.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#162 | |
Mar 2011
2·7 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I'll let you know if I run into any other problems. I only use basic stress testing though. i9 9900K user. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
7,411 Posts |
![]()
29.5 build 8
1) Fixed problems reading gwnum.txt. 2) Torture test dialog box rewritten. 3) Gwnum add and subtract are now multithreaded for AVX-512. Thus, faster multithread ECM and P-1. 4) Benchmark results are now written to results.bench.txt. 5) JSON results are now available for all work performed. JSON results are written to results.json.txt. 6) The benchmarking hangs are fixed (fingers crossed). 7) Modular inverses in ECM now use GMP -- a small performance boost. This is likely the last 29.5 build. My plan is for the next release to be 29.6 -- a release candidate. I have a few more bugs / features to investigate / add. Linux 64-bit: ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/p95v295b8.linux64.tar.gz Windows 64-bit: ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/p95v295b8.win64.zip |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#164 |
Sep 2003
22·647 Posts |
![]()
For smallish exponents it doesn't print out res2048.
I only tested for b=10 so far. For example, for n=613 it only prints out res64; for n=641 it prints both res64 and res2048. Code:
{"status":"C", "k":1, "b":10, "n":613, "c":-1, "known-factors":"9", "worktype":"PRP-3", "res64":"B4258816CA6260F2", "residue-type":1, "fft-length":128, "error-code":"00000000", "security-code":"04CA04CA", "program":{"name":"Prime95", "version":"29.5", "build":8, "port":8}, "timestamp":"2019-01-21 04:58:08", ...} {"status":"C", "k":1, "b":10, "n":641, "c":-1, "known-factors":"9", "worktype":"PRP-3", "res64":"C9DAD4B06AD50DC4", "residue-type":1, "res2048":"...", "fft-length":128, "error-code":"00000000", "security-code":"05020502", "program":{"name":"Prime95", "version":"29.5", "build":8, "port":8}, "timestamp":"2019-01-21 04:58:08", ...} |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#165 |
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
17·181 Posts |
![]()
1 Round off error during 29.5b6 I noticed now when I was changing to 29.5b8:
[Work thread Jan 13 02:29:21] Resuming Gerbicz error-checking PRP test of M88479649 using AVX-512 FFT length 4704K, Pass1=1344, Pass2=3584, clm=1 [Work thread Jan 17 17:51:17] Iteration: 54083596/88479649, Possible error: round off (0.4366392078) > 0.42188 |
![]() |
![]() |