mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Miscellaneous Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-10-10, 13:40   #1
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

24×3×73 Posts
Default Prime Numbers Book

Enjoy and criticize. It ain't no C&P but might help some.

After 20 downloads, I have made the changes to typos and Mersenne data. A new copy is now uploaded.

2 More downloads and I have uploaded a new version without the Euler Phi Function nonsense -- Thanks Robert.

24 more downloads and a new version is up with accumulated corrections and suggested text.

13 more downloads. The replacement (12th Oct) version corrects some grammatical errors, includes suggestions by Nick and a Lucas Sequence algorithm.

12 more downloads. The replacement (Oct 15th) makes the suggestions by Nick and corrects some typos.

4 more downloads. The replacement builds on suggestions by Nick. There is now a section on Gaussian primes. Replacement (18 Oct,2020) uploaded.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Prime_Numbers_by_Paul_Underwood.pdf (191.2 KB, 24 views)

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2020-10-18 at 00:19
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-10, 14:10   #2
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

2·23·83 Posts
Default

There is a caveat in using the term "number" to mean "natural number" or "positive integer."

Euclid distinguished between 1 ("the unit") and integers greater than 1, which he called "numbers." Thus, a "prime number" was, by definition an integer greater than 1.

The unit, 1, is neither prime nor composite.
Dr Sardonicus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-10, 14:28   #3
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

4,733 Posts
Default spell check; grammar

Legendre, Jocobi and Kronecker (should be Jacobi) (page 3)

"The determinant of a A is" (bottom of page 9)
The determinant of a matrix A is

nothing else conspicuous through page 10 on a first pass.

Pretty clean.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-10-10 at 14:29
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-10, 14:52   #4
Viliam Furik
 
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

4018 Posts
Default

Page 3 - Typo in "Jocobi"
Page 32 - Fig. 7.1 contains n = 2 twice, lots of unknown where it shouldn't be (n= 61,89,107)
Viliam Furik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-10, 15:59   #5
R. Gerbicz
 
R. Gerbicz's Avatar
 
"Robert Gerbicz"
Oct 2005
Hungary

2×709 Posts
Default

On page 39:
"The Euler Phi Function is useful since for all a
a^(1+φ(n)) ≡ a (mod n)."

This is very false, a small counter-example is a=2, n=4.
R. Gerbicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-10, 20:46   #6
bhelmes
 
bhelmes's Avatar
 
Mar 2016

7·41 Posts
Default

"It is important to analize the the exponentiating" page 49.


Greetings
Bernhard
bhelmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-10, 20:53   #7
Knut
 
Oct 2020

216 Posts
Default

You write i were the square root of -1.


As far as I know, the square root r of a number x is the non-negative solution of the equation r^2 = x as far as real numbers are concerned.



As i is neither positive nor negative and i^2 = -1 and (-i)^2 = -1 in my opinion it is not correct to say i would be the square root of -1.


Best regards


Knut
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-10, 22:40   #8
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

24·3·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut View Post
You write i were the square root of -1.


As far as I know, the square root r of a number x is the non-negative solution of the equation r^2 = x as far as real numbers are concerned.



As i is neither positive nor negative and i^2 = -1 and (-i)^2 = -1 in my opinion it is not correct to say i would be the square root of -1.


Best regards


Knut
I have read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_unit What would you say I should write? i is fixed to be one of the two square roots of -1?

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2020-10-10 at 22:44
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-10, 22:43   #9
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

24×3×73 Posts
Default

I have tidied up what I want write about "The Fermatian Child".

I will refrain from reposting the paper until more input from folks.

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2020-10-10 at 22:51
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-11, 05:28   #10
Knut
 
Oct 2020

2 Posts
Default

I think there is no square root of -1.


Instead, define the "imaginary unit" i with i^2 = -1. And then define complex numbers.


This, in my opinion, could help to avoid disturbances.



E.g.


x^2 = 3*i
x^2 = - 3*i
x^2 = 2 + 3*i
x^2 = 2 - 3*i
x^2 = - 2 + 3*i
x^2 = - 2 - 3*i



There are two (complex) solutions of each equation, of course. Which of the two solutions is to be named the "square root"? I am not aware of a definition.


I apologize fpr my poor command of the English language and hope you can see my point.


Best regards


Knut
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-11, 07:44   #11
Nick
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Dec 2012
The Netherlands

27408 Posts
Default

There are a number of errors at the start, some just details of definitions but others hiding more important points.
How it would be best to resolve these depends strongly on who you are writing this for.
What is the intended audience?
Nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New M51 Book with All Digits Microprint314 Lounge 13 2019-10-05 17:05
WHERE to get this book for <$100?! Stargate38 Lounge 3 2016-11-20 01:17
Is this book appropriate? Xyzzy Number Theory Discussion Group 14 2016-08-21 10:24
Free book! Xyzzy Math 24 2015-11-13 23:33
Book Review Numbers Lounge 5 2005-09-30 17:53

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:17.

Mon Nov 30 01:17:15 UTC 2020 up 80 days, 22:28, 3 users, load averages: 1.64, 1.59, 1.41

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.