mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet > GPU to 72

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2015-11-24, 03:44   #67
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·29·83 Posts
Default

Such as these seven:

Code:
Guilty-Spark	34568419	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	79.3	6B4A1F93BE4EF0__	40.9060
Guilty-Spark	34564379	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	80.7	77A3E5018FF35C__	40.9012
Guilty-Spark	34564399	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	80.7	C518088875C47A__	40.9012
Guilty-Spark	34543867	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	89.0	06C1EED10BDC1C__	40.8769
Guilty-Spark	34541833	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	89.5	D7504BD8F7BA5E__	40.8745
Guilty-Spark	34539227	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	90.7	93B5328A78F157__	40.8714
Guilty-Spark	34538591	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	91.0	7E5331E8F3A4C9__	40.8707
My Cat I DC computer was offline but crunching for several weeks. I "extended" the reservations via the manual reservation form, but apparently the 60 day deadline overrode those extensions.

Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2015-11-24 at 03:45
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-24, 04:09   #68
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

2·5·7·47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Even with Primenet's LL / DC / P-1 efforts this happens. Someone makes a promise of completion but then doesn't deliver; the candidate is then reassigned and then the original assignee completes.

It is very difficult to manage independent actors....
Primenet *could* simply reject unassigned results coming in, but most of us probably agree with George that it would be weird to reject work just because it wasn't assigned (whether it was an expired one that just kept going, or was outright poached).
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-24, 04:13   #69
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

2×5×7×47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
Such as these seven:

Code:
Guilty-Spark	34568419	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	79.3	6B4A1F93BE4EF0__	40.9060
Guilty-Spark	34564379	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	80.7	77A3E5018FF35C__	40.9012
Guilty-Spark	34564399	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	80.7	C518088875C47A__	40.9012
Guilty-Spark	34543867	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	89.0	06C1EED10BDC1C__	40.8769
Guilty-Spark	34541833	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	89.5	D7504BD8F7BA5E__	40.8745
Guilty-Spark	34539227	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	90.7	93B5328A78F157__	40.8714
Guilty-Spark	34538591	C - Verified	2015-09-09 11:16	91.0	7E5331E8F3A4C9__	40.8707
My Cat I DC computer was offline but crunching for several weeks. I "extended" the reservations via the manual reservation form, but apparently the 60 day deadline overrode those extensions.
Yeah, the cat 1 stuff in the bleeding-edge have more aggressive expiration dates. But that's by design. My suggestion would be that if you have a machine that doesn't check in regularly and provide updates (not merely extending them from the website), uncheck the box saying you want those preferred assignments. Otherwise it's likely to happen again.

Might not have been the case for you... maybe you had those assignments for a really long time and the leading edge caught up with you?
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-24, 05:50   #70
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

160658 Posts
Default

The offline but crunching was a one-off thing. You can see that the machine has turned in several results since then, and continues to crunch Cat I DCs.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-24, 19:49   #71
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

9,421 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
The offline but crunching was a one-off thing. You can see that the machine has turned in several results since then, and continues to crunch Cat I DCs.
Let's be honest here... If one makes a promise, that's a contract.

If one doesn't do what they promise, then they've broken the contract.

I myself have done this; one of my stacks lost its' UPS and then came back online three weeks later. Unfortunately candidates were reassigned in the interim and my machines competed the work thus wasting work.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-25, 03:46   #72
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·29·83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Let's be honest here... If one makes a promise, that's a contract.

If one doesn't do what they promise, then they've broken the contract.

I myself have done this; one of my stacks lost its' UPS and then came back online three weeks later. Unfortunately candidates were reassigned in the interim and my machines competed the work thus wasting work.
Yeah... at least now I know I must ask for a manual intervention, or share the work in progress.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-12-08, 15:31   #73
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

100111101010102 Posts
Default

It seems that monst has taken 2 TF assignments which I had for about 3 weeks, but which had not expired. I discovered it this morning when one of them came up "Not Needed." I hope jumping the gun does not become a habit. That was about 7 hours work, for me.
Manual
81929833LL TF73752016-11-15 05:11:572016-12-08 09:20:2070.048
81929773LL TF73752016-11-15 05:11:572016-12-08 05:20:2370.048
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-12-08, 22:38   #74
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

235810 Posts
Default

Is there any good reason to not accept already-completed ranges?

Given than PrimeNet already accepts LL results beyond double checks, I don't see any reason to reject duplicate TF results. If anything, having someone independently verify a range isn't a bad idea anyway.
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-02-22, 05:41   #75
apocalypse
 
Feb 2003

101011102 Posts
Default

FWIW, I just discovered that monst submitted TF results for these exponents which I had reserved through GPU72 and which were a few days from expiry (incl. 2 with factors).

Computer Exponent WorkType From To Assigned * Completed GHz Days
Manual ‡ 83871163 LL TF 71 75 2017-01-25 04:50:40 2017-02-21 21:15:13 39.915
Manual . 83870947 LL TF 71 75 2017-01-25 04:50:40 2017-02-21 18:04:42 85.534
Manual . 83871079 LL TF 71 75 2017-01-25 04:50:40 2017-02-21 18:04:42 85.534
Manual ‡ 83870923 LL TF 71 75 2017-01-25 04:50:40 2017-02-21 18:04:22 85.534
apocalypse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-02-22, 05:43   #76
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

27AA16 Posts
Default

I sympathize..

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2017-02-22 at 05:46
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-02-22, 11:08   #77
0PolarBearsHere
 
0PolarBearsHere's Avatar
 
Oct 2015

1000010102 Posts
Default

.

Last fiddled with by 0PolarBearsHere on 2017-02-22 at 11:35
0PolarBearsHere is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tf results not needed MatWur-S530113 GPU to 72 10 2017-12-09 15:36
Results not Needed RMAC9.5 PrimeNet 3 2013-06-26 13:16
not needed zeit PrimeNet 3 2008-04-25 08:03
Help needed AntonVrba Math 3 2007-03-06 10:55
V24.12 QA help needed Prime95 Software 5 2005-06-17 15:54

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:42.

Thu Jan 28 09:42:44 UTC 2021 up 56 days, 5:54, 0 users, load averages: 2.73, 2.61, 2.38

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.