mersenneforum.org LLR/PRP/phrot/pfgw:- Pick A Range
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2008-07-02, 02:30   #1
masser

Jul 2003

144410 Posts
LLR/PRP/phrot/pfgw:- Pick A Range

Reservations available - the files may be found here. We'll see how this goes...

LLR: Pick a Range

This thread is meant for you to reserve ranges for probable primality testing (LLR/PRP).

Please send results files (with residues) to base5 DOT factors AT yahoo DOT com.

Riesel Candidates
prpnet.prp approx 1600 candidates completed by PRPNET
prpnet.prp.2 approx 5800 candidates reserved by PRPNET

Sierpinski Candidates
exps4 approx 435 candidates reserved by masser

Primes
Code:
 71098*5^319336+1  rogue
287626*5^277175-1  Free-DC Mercenaries
Note: -- messages posted on this thread can be deleted without notice, during the cleaning process.

Questions
Quote:
 Originally Posted by em99010pepe Can I post here the results or do I have to send them by email?
It should not be a problem if you link to the results files here. I would prefer email, but leave it up to you.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Rincewind Hi, what's this "section" about? I sieved some Factors and are finishing some PRP/LLRs, but, what is the content of the linked files? Is this somethin like doubletesting?
This thread is for those people that don't have networked machines but still want to test candidate pairs for primality. Also, as noted elsewhere, there are alternative (and faster) testing clients to LLRNET, such as phrot, LLR, PRP and pfgw.

Last fiddled with by masser on 2009-02-18 at 03:45

 2009-02-06, 04:49 #2 masser     Jul 2003 wear a mask 101101001002 Posts Stickied Reservation I stickied the thread AND I am reserving exps4.
 2009-04-06, 17:17 #3 Rincewind     Oct 2006 103 Posts Hi, is there any new work for this section expected?
 2009-04-07, 02:33 #4 masser     Jul 2003 wear a mask 22×192 Posts Yes, but my inbox for my day job is a little full right now. Please be patient with us.
 2009-06-14, 21:05 #5 Rincewind     Oct 2006 103 Posts Manual testing Hi, its me again *g* if I want to test a certain K-value manualy, is it correct if I use Code: sr5sieve -a k n-min n-max to get my workfile? And send the results to the e-mail adresse in the first post? If it is correct, which n-min value should I use? "min n untested", "max n tested"?
2009-08-07, 22:54   #6
Lennart

"Lennart"
Jun 2007

46016 Posts

Here is prpnet.prp.2 result file

Lennart
Attached Files
 completed_tests.logSR5.zip (124.3 KB, 148 views)

 2009-08-18, 19:14 #7 Rincewind     Oct 2006 103 Posts OK, I created a file for k = 126134, Nmin= 330949 and Nmax 2000000 Code: sr5sieve -g 126134 330949 2000000 renamed the generated file to "expr" and started phrot with Code:  phrot.3-linxu.static -0 expr is this correct? (any answers please)
2009-08-18, 19:34   #8
rogue

"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

5,953 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Rincewind OK, I created a file for k = 126134, Nmin= 330949 and Nmax 2000000 Code: sr5sieve -g 126134 330949 2000000 renamed the generated file to "expr" and started phrot with Code:  phrot.3-linxu.static -0 expr is this correct? (any answers please)
If you run phrot without any switches it will tell you what is available. Of course it is also in the readme. I suspect that you want to use -o, not -0.

 2009-08-18, 19:44 #9 Rincewind     Oct 2006 103 Posts errr ... yeah, I meant "o" not "0". Sorry. Thanks for the answer. Last fiddled with by Rincewind on 2009-08-18 at 19:44

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Citrix Prime Sierpinski Project 2 2014-02-16 18:47 Citrix Prime Sierpinski Project 40 2010-09-22 20:12 masser Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 27 2010-09-08 03:10 rogue Conjectures 'R Us 33 2010-01-22 19:39 rogue Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 142 2009-01-09 03:42

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:44.

Thu Oct 29 11:44:29 UTC 2020 up 49 days, 8:55, 1 user, load averages: 1.96, 1.78, 1.85