mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > No Prime Left Behind

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-01-06, 02:02   #23
IronBits
I ♥ BOINC!
 
IronBits's Avatar
 
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)

45916 Posts
Default

I'm ready for the knpairs and we will use port 9000.
Once I get it, I need to do a little bit of testing first, then I'll let you guys know when it's ready to come get some.

Last fiddled with by IronBits on 2009-01-06 at 02:06
IronBits is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 02:34   #24
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×3×13×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronBits View Post
I'm ready for the knpairs and we will use port 9000.
Once I get it, I need to do a little bit of testing first, then I'll let you guys know when it's ready to come get some.

OK, I need to leave in a bit. I'll send you a file when I set up the drive page in ~10-12 hours but I'll have people hold off connecting to the new server until you are done with your testing.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 14:04   #25
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×3×13×131 Posts
Default

Reserving k=1005-1049 for port 9000. The drive is ready to go!


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-01-06 at 15:33 Reason: ready to go!
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 15:22   #26
IronBits
I ♥ BOINC!
 
IronBits's Avatar
 
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)

3×7×53 Posts
Default

Port 9000 is active...

Please go slowly when adding lots-o-boxen as I won't be here, so can't kick it if there is a problem.
IronBits is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 15:30   #27
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2·3·13·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronBits View Post
Port 9000 is active...

Please go slowly when adding lots-o-boxen as I won't be here, so can't kick it if there is a problem.

OK, ready to go folks...

I would suggest no more than 4 cores per person and no more than about 15-20 cores total to start with. When I get back in a couple of days, I'll add a core or two to it for a while.

Please post in this thread how many cores you will put on the server as you add them.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 15:40   #28
Flatlander
I quite division it
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England

31×67 Posts
Default

3 cores at the moment, 4 (total) later.

Last fiddled with by Flatlander on 2009-01-06 at 15:41
Flatlander is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 15:51   #29
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

131428 Posts
Default

i have just put 2 on
henryzz is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 16:15   #30
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

186116 Posts
Default

Added one core for a short while to check this out a bit. (In other news: I see that we're at ~168K already on k=1005! Wow! Though I guess that's somewhat to be expected considering how fast I was able to move on just one core back when I did k=1003 from 10K-500K on my own with mostly just one core...)

BTW, I noticed this in the first post of this thread:
Quote:
No manual files will be posted. All tests will be done on the server.
Eh? I hadn't heard that we were doing this. This is kind of confusing. I mean, I don't see how manual files would cause any problems--in fact, considering as how we're doing this drive by k-range and all, I'd think that manual files would be quite easy to administrate.

Max
mdettweiler is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 16:36   #31
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2·3·13·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Added one core for a short while to check this out a bit. (In other news: I see that we're at ~168K already on k=1005! Wow! Though I guess that's somewhat to be expected considering how fast I was able to move on just one core back when I did k=1003 from 10K-500K on my own with mostly just one core...)

BTW, I noticed this in the first post of this thread:

Eh? I hadn't heard that we were doing this. This is kind of confusing. I mean, I don't see how manual files would cause any problems--in fact, considering as how we're doing this drive by k-range and all, I'd think that manual files would be quite easy to administrate.

Max

We're at n=168K on k=1005 because David has 6 very fast cores on it.

Ian suggested that it would be a pain to "allow manual reservations" so I just ran with it. lol See his Jan. 5th post. Technically I'm somewhat indifferent but it would be nice to have a drive without posting files. The testing time loss for the older LLR version is minimal at such low n-ranges.

Can everyone please post their opinions on reserving manual files for this drive?

Gotta go now...back on in ~7 hours for a short bit.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 16:48   #32
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

792 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
We're at n=168K on k=1005 because David has 6 very fast cores on it.

Ian suggested that it would be a pain to "allow manual reservations" so I just ran with it. lol See his Jan. 5th post. Technically I'm somewhat indifferent but it would be nice to have a drive without posting files. The testing time loss for the older LLR version is minimal at such low n-ranges.

Can everyone please post their opinions on reserving manual files for this drive?

Gotta go now...back on in ~7 hours for a short bit.


Gary
Hmm, I see what you're saying. And I can say that it would be nice not to have to continually worry about uploading new manual files for yet another team drive every time we reload the server.

But, how about this: we allow manual reservations, but not pre-posted; files would instead be available on request--sort of like what we did at the end of the 1st and 3rd Drives. That way, we can have manual reservations, yet essentially without any extra admin hassle than it would normally be to reload a server.

Max
mdettweiler is offline  
Old 2009-01-06, 16:49   #33
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

17×251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Ian suggested that it would be a pain to "allow manual reservations" so I just ran with it. lol See his Jan. 5th post. Technically I'm somewhat indifferent but it would be nice to have a drive without posting files. The testing time loss for the older LLR version is minimal at such low n-ranges.

Can everyone please post their opinions on reserving manual files for this drive?
I think at the very least, you should allow specific manual reservations, but I don't see a need to post files before they're requested. (i.e. don't bother posting manual files without a reservation, but allow manual reservations and send the file when someone does)
Edit: ninja'd

Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-01-06 at 16:51
Mini-Geek is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Team drive #10 k=1400-2000 n=500K-1M gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 61 2013-01-30 16:08
Team drive #12 k=2000-3000 n=50K-425K gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 96 2012-02-19 03:53
Team drive #11 k=2000-3000 n=425K-600K gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 42 2010-11-19 10:42
Team drive #8 k=1400-2000 n=350K-500K gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 101 2009-04-08 02:11
Sieving drive for k=1005-2000 n=200K-500K gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 118 2009-01-17 16:05

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:07.

Tue Oct 20 01:07:49 UTC 2020 up 39 days, 22:18, 0 users, load averages: 2.26, 2.11, 2.16

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.