|
2020-09-13, 15:03
|
#2 |
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
2×7×29 Posts |
That should be PRP-CF-tests, not "normal" PRP-tests, since they are around 10M, not 100M.
Or what do you want the user to know? |
|
|
|
2020-09-13, 15:07
|
#3 |
Jul 2009
Germany
547 Posts |
Unfortunately you cannot see whether it is PRP-CF or an error in the configuration. In any case, normal PRP tests would no longer make sense.It was probably my fault, but better to ask than not to say anything.
Last fiddled with by moebius on 2020-09-13 at 15:10 |
|
|
|
2020-09-13, 15:26
|
#4 |
Sep 2009
197710 Posts |
In those 4 cases the factors were found years ago and the assignments are recent. So they must be PRP-CF assignmenst to check if the cofactor is prime.
The only bad case is if a factor is found *after* an assigment has been issued. Chris |
|
|
|
|
2020-09-13, 15:28
|
#5 | |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
14916 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-13, 15:35
|
#6 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×4,597 Posts |
And those are all in the range for first time PRP-CF. 10M is the current norm for those assignments.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-13, 17:22
|
#7 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
3·17·59 Posts |
The PRP-CF "wavefront" is at 10.5M, but as soon as new factors are found for exponents <10.5M they are assigned to PRP-CF.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nearly all Factors up to 2^69 found between 2.9G and 2.95G | Kalli Hofmann | Marin's Mersenne-aries | 12 | 2019-11-06 11:49 |
| Composite P-1 factors not showing up under recently cleared exponents? | ixfd64 | PrimeNet | 2 | 2018-02-28 07:54 |
| How are such big factors found? (M1193) | heliosh | PrimeNet | 7 | 2018-01-24 16:54 |
| No factors found | aketilander | PrimeNet | 9 | 2011-05-17 11:32 |
| Fermat 12 factors already found? | UberNumberGeek | Factoring | 6 | 2009-06-17 17:22 |
