![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
![]() Quote:
However, before I found the repository, their installation scripts never worked on Ubuntu, and I was much more frustrated then. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,479 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Every time the kernel gets updated you are supposed to recompile the nVidia drivers yourself. It's stupid, I agree. It's also the law (which is also stupid). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
11100001101012 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I guess that anyone using that repository is breaking the contract then. Also note that Canonical also supplies the drivers in a "partner" repository, and since those are from nVidia directly, that must have a different license. *shrug* |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,479 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
It *is* possible that the rpm/dep file downloads the current nVidia driver and runs it. But I doubt it. And for some reason the repo maintainers are always behind the ball on kernel upgrades and nVidia driver releases... Quote:
It's complicated.... |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
"Oliver"
Mar 2005
Germany
11·101 Posts |
![]()
Hi!
Quote:
Quote:
I guess you have either no X running or X is configured not to use the nvidia driver. X is priviliged to load kernel modules, a normal user not. When you run 'nvidia-smi -a' some software notices that it should load the nvidia kernel module. When running 'nvidia-smi -a' as normal user you're not allowed to... when you do the same as priviliged user (e.g. root) it is possible to load the module. Same for mfaktc: running as user: no automagic module loading... but when you start as root it would... Solutions (pick one of them):
I would choose the first option, this is tested on Ubuntu 12.04. Create those two files as root: /etc/udev/rules.d/86-nvidia.rules: Code:
SUBSYSTEM=="module", KERNEL=="nvidia", RUN+="/lib/udev/nvidia.sh" Code:
#!/bin/bash mknod -m 666 /dev/nvidiactl c 195 255 #chown root:root /dev/nvidiactl for DEV in {0..7} # one for each GPU do mknod -m 666 /dev/nvidia${DEV} c 195 ${DEV} # chown root:root /dev/nvidia${DEV} done Oliver |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Jul 2006
USA (UT-5) via UK (UT)
EC16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
a replacement GPU, mfaktc ran quite happily on both GPUs. One process ran out of work, so I repopulated worktodo.txt and tried to rerun mfaktc.exe. Got the following error: NVIDIA: API mismatch: the NVIDIA kernel module has version 304.64, but this NVIDIA driver component has version 304.84. Please make sure that the kernel module and all NVIDIA driver components have the same version. Failed to initialize NVML: Unknown Error (The other GPU is continuing to run and is not going to run out of work any time soon.) I tried running "sudo nvidia-smi -a" and got: NVIDIA: API mismatch: the NVIDIA kernel module has version 304.64, but this NVIDIA driver component has version 304.84. Please make sure that the kernel module and all NVIDIA driver components have the same version. Failed to initialize NVML: Unknown Error Presumably some update applied in the <12 hours that the machine has been running broke something in the NVIDIA set up. (The machine had been off-line for a couple of weeks, so there were a lot of updates to apply.) Any thoughts? Gareth |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Jul 2006
USA (UT-5) via UK (UT)
3548 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What happened to moregimps.it? It seems to have disappeared... | Stargate38 | Operation Billion Digits | 2 | 2017-05-08 18:53 |
NVIDIA TITAN 320.59 driver with cuda 5.5 | Manpowre | GPU Computing | 43 | 2013-08-22 12:28 |
Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick and CudaLucas 1.2 - Fatal kernel update | moebius | Linux | 1 | 2012-02-20 03:17 |
A new driver? (or type of driver?) | 10metreh | Aliquot Sequences | 3 | 2010-02-15 15:57 |
smilies disappeared from post composition page! | mdettweiler | Forum Feedback | 3 | 2008-02-21 09:20 |