mersenneforum.org 3+ table
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2005-01-18, 14:31 #1 garo     Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 276810 Posts 3+ table Code: Size Base Index + Diff. Ratio 256 3 683 + 325.8 0.784 277 3 692 + 330.1 0.837 302 3 701 + 334.4 0.901 327 3 709 + 338.2 0.965 330 3 712 + 339.7 0.969 264 3 716 + 341.6 0.771 222 3 718 + 342.5 0.646 333 3 719 + 343 0.969 286 3 722 + 344.4 0.828 316 3 727 + 346.8 0.909 285 3 743 + 354.5 0.96 337 3 746 + 355.9 0.945 306 3 752 + 358.7 0.851 285 3 758 + 361.6 0.786 262 3 760 + 290 0.901 /5 363 3 764 + 364.5 0.994 308 3 767 + 337.8 0.91 /13 321 3 769 + 366.9 0.873 317 3 772 + 368.3 0.859 288 3 773 + 368.8 0.779 223 3 775 + 295.8 0.752 /5 357 3 787 + 375.4 0.949 371 3 794 + 378.8 0.978 372 3 797 + 380.2 0.976 325 3 802 + 382.6 0.848 231 3 803 + 348.2 0.661 /11q 252 3 805 + 329.2 0.763 /7 316 3 809 + 385.9 0.8 262 3 814 + 353 0.74 /11q 293 3 815 + 311 0.94 /5q 358 3 818 + 390.2 0.915 218 3 820 + 312.9 0.694 /5q 319 3 821 + 391.7 0.813 355 3 823 + 392.6 0.902 362 3 824 + 393.1 0.919 324 3 826 + 337.8 0.957 /7 285 3 829 + 395.5 0.719 285 3 830 + 316.8 0.898 /5q 290 3 832 + 366.4 0.79 /13 238 3 833 + 340.6 0.697 /7 374 3 838 + 399.8 0.934 358 3 839 + 400.3 0.893 364 3 842 + 401.7 0.904 290 3 845 + 372.2 0.779 /13 Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2022-03-25 at 19:31 Reason: 3,674+, 784+ done
 2005-01-18, 14:32 #2 garo     Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 24·173 Posts 3LM table extensions Below are unofficial extended tables, just for reference: Code: Size Base Index LM Diff. Ratio Notes 228 3 1707 L 271.4 0.838 204 3 1707 M 271.4 0.750 268 3 1713 M 272.4 0.982 261 3 1719 L 273.3 0.953 254 3 1719 M 273.3 0.927 223 3 1731 L 275.2 0.808 250 3 1731 M 275.2 0.907 237 3 1737 L 276.2 0.856 239 3 1749 L 278.1 0.858 177 3 1755 L 223.2 0.759 /5q 277 3 1761 L 280.0 0.987 215 3 1767 M 281.0 0.763 249 3 1773 L 281.9 0.881 274 3 1791 L 284.8 0.960 254 3 1797 M 285.8 0.890 FactorDB::3LM Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2018-06-29 at 21:34 Reason: 3,1725M and 3,1779M are factored
 2005-10-25, 17:22 #3 akruppa     "Nancy" Aug 2002 Alexandria 2,467 Posts 7400 curves at B1=44M on 3,452+. Adds 0.965715 to p50 and 0.147614 to p55. 9205 curves at B1=44M on 3,463+. Adds 1.2 to p50 and 0.18342 to p55. 6346 curves at B1=44M on 3,545+ c143. Adds 4.89282 to p45, 0.82727 to p50 and 0.12645 to p55. Alex Edit: these are done. Last fiddled with by akruppa on 2006-01-23 at 18:27
 2005-10-29, 05:55 #4 akruppa     "Nancy" Aug 2002 Alexandria 46438 Posts 9736 curves at B1=44M on 3,479+ c197. Adds 1.26633 to p50 and 0.19356 to p55. Alex
 2005-10-31, 05:37 #5 akruppa     "Nancy" Aug 2002 Alexandria 2,467 Posts 3,497+: Code: Probable prime factor 1 has 47 digits: 13220422274071910215876252468819242538756902481 Probable prime factor 2 has 145 digits: 1028248914155777647603823817612964181123625935969578906286713681161305282458188916457982024457562913249540388063995686960347365376871312962422643 ECM miss. Alex
2005-10-31, 17:37   #6
R.D. Silverman

"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston

22×1,877 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by akruppa 3,497+: Code: Probable prime factor 1 has 47 digits: 13220422274071910215876252468819242538756902481 Probable prime factor 2 has 145 digits: 1028248914155777647603823817612964181123625935969578906286713681161305282458188916457982024457562913249540388063995686960347365376871312962422643 ECM miss. Alex
I see that you deleted the entry for 3,497+, but did not update the
curve counts/probabilities for the other numbers you did. Will you update
the curve counts?

 2005-10-31, 17:46 #7 akruppa     "Nancy" Aug 2002 Alexandria 1001101000112 Posts I'd rather not, unless someone actually wants me to. I plan to do the numbers I ran curves on so far by NFS shortly anyway. Alex
 2005-11-01, 11:38 #8 akruppa     "Nancy" Aug 2002 Alexandria 46438 Posts 9180 curves at B1=44M and 3400 at B1=110M on 3,499+. Adds 2.27437 to p50, 0.372878 to p55 and 0.055737 to p60. Alex
 2005-11-01, 13:15 #9 garo     Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 276810 Posts I think it is simpler for one person to update the curve counts. I maintain a database on my computer and run a script periodically to generate new curve counts. I think that is much handier than having every person who runs curve counts make changes to the table in three rows per exponent.
2005-11-01, 13:31   #10
R.D. Silverman

"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston

22×1,877 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by garo I think it is simpler for one person to update the curve counts. I maintain a database on my computer and run a script periodically to generate new curve counts. I think that is much handier than having every person who runs curve counts make changes to the table in three rows per exponent.
I agree. However, I must ask: "how you get the information regarding
work that has been done?". Bruce Dodson, for example has indicated
in an email to Alex (if I interpret his words correctly) that all Cunningham
numbers less than 260 digits have been fully tested (work = 1.0) to the
45 digit level. But he has not publically announced this. He has also done
a lot of work at the 50 digit level, but again, he has not announced the
precise nature of his level of effort.

The only reason I discuss this is that it is nice, for those of us doing NFS,
to know that numbers have been sufficiently tested to proceed with NFS.

 2005-11-02, 09:35 #11 garo     Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 53208 Posts I usually get information from Bruce directly or through intermediaries such as Paul Leyland, akruppa or rogue. With someone like Bruce who puts in a huge amount of ECM testing it is easier to keep track of his work - though his email can sometimes be cryptically worded ;) - it is a bit harder with all the small contributors.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post garo Cunningham Tables 87 2022-03-25 19:16 garo Cunningham Tables 100 2021-01-04 22:36 garo Cunningham Tables 80 2021-01-04 22:33 garo Cunningham Tables 82 2020-03-15 21:47 garo Cunningham Tables 41 2016-08-04 04:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:19.

Tue Jan 31 01:19:48 UTC 2023 up 165 days, 22:48, 1 user, load averages: 0.82, 1.00, 0.99