mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Riesel Prime Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-05-09, 23:31   #34
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

24×172 Posts
Default

Paul tested.
Congratulations Vincent!
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-05-09, 23:50   #35
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

677 Posts
Default

Thanks!
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-06-13, 00:11   #36
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

677 Posts
Default

I was so lucky again:

69 * 2^3140225 - 1

http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=118012

status : proven
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-06-13, 02:35   #37
Kosmaj
 
Kosmaj's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

2×1,811 Posts
Default

Hi diep,

Congrats on these nice 3-M bit primes!! Wagstaff's celebration will be a blast!

Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2014-06-13 at 02:36
Kosmaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-10-05, 06:25   #38
Kosmaj
 
Kosmaj's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

2×1,811 Posts
Default

Hi diep,

I'm updating our status page and I wonder where are you now with your k=69 tests.

Tnx!
Kosmaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-10-05, 10:39   #39
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

12458 Posts
Default

yes very far in the 3.5M+ yet one node with 8 finishing cores in range 2.95M - 3.2M suffered from heat problems and it yet has to be fixed coming week or so. I expect it to be up and running next week or so. So it doesn't make sense to call it for sure there are no primes in those ranges.

Odds become very realistic though next prime is > 1M digits.

Then after that i need a check i checked all the exponents i had to check.

My machines are not networked (poor man's security against consultants sneaking around) so each core has its own job.

Of course i found already 2 more primes than i had expected to find within this range, so i'm not complaining in that sense :)

edit: checked up to 2.98M all exponents once - more info 2 weeks from now.

Last fiddled with by diep on 2014-10-05 at 10:50
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-10-05, 12:53   #40
Kosmaj
 
Kosmaj's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

2·1,811 Posts
Default

diep, thanks for your quick reply. I'll mark your limit as n=2.98M for the time being.

No problems about the way you test the numbers just be sure to test every one at least once!

Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2014-10-05 at 12:54
Kosmaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-10-05, 13:38   #41
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

67710 Posts
Default

you bet they all get tested :)

It's getting winter here soon, so in order to not catch a cold i have no option except to increase number of cores at 69 :)
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-10-08, 12:28   #42
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

677 Posts
Default

Yo, i have 1 box do clean up of remnants (left behind because of overheated box). Expect 2 cores might take weeks doing that. If they finish everything searched one time till 3.5M here.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-17, 01:23   #43
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

67710 Posts
Default

Yo cleanup goes slow. 4 cores need to finish batch there. Week from now everything should have been checked once until around 3.42M and then when some finishing core finishes its slow moving batch some months from now it's rather unlikely there is a yet undiscovered prime underneath 3.50M

So odds start to get very small now there still is a prime under 3.42M

LLR times really slowed down going from some finishing 3.0M range as compared to for example 3.68M range. About 50% slowdown. Running currently 24 cores.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-01-08, 02:31   #44
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

10101001012 Posts
Default

update: everything between 2.5M to 3.57M (so not all in 3.57M have finished yet up to 3.56M has been completely finished) has been checked once.

RPS i assume has finished up to 2.5M by now meaning everything for 69 * 2^n - 1 up until 3.56M has been checked once.

Busy checking up to 4M now.
Will take many months to finish everything until 4M.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 14:15.

Wed Aug 5 14:15:25 UTC 2020 up 19 days, 10:02, 1 user, load averages: 1.67, 1.58, 1.61

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.