Posts that seem less than useless, or something like that

[Batalov]

Originally Posted by bbb120

(as of 01:41 UTC edit)
no need to prove primality of R49081,
Baillie-PSW and miller Rabin （choose several random base ）is enough to prove primality ,
and is much much faster !

Baillie-PSW and miller Rabin （choose several random base ） are Much more reliable than DNA identification

Can DNA identification be used to identify one of the two identical twins?
I'll give you a hint: NO.
Then why do you use it as a measuring stick for "reliability"?

[bbb120]

Originally Posted by T.Rex

I have opened a new thread in "Math" about Elliptic Curves for Wagstaff numbers.
I provide a PRP formula very very close to a formula built by means of Elliptic Curves for proving the primality of Fermat numbers.
Now, we need math experts in Primality Proving with Elliptic Curves in order to build a proof (if it is possible... EC are so rich and complex, we don't know).

use fast ECPP software?

[bbb120]

Originally Posted by T.Rex

I have opened a new thread in "Math" about Elliptic Curves for Wagstaff numbers.
I provide a PRP formula very very close to a formula built by means of Elliptic Curves for proving the primality of Fermat numbers.
Now, we need math experts in Primality Proving with Elliptic Curves in order to build a proof (if it is possible... EC are so rich and complex, we don't know).

baillie-PSW primality and miller rabin primality are good enough！！！！！！！！！

MOD WARNING: your are talking about PRP in a thread about primality. Stop it. This is strike 2!

[VBCurtis]

Originally Posted by bbb120

baillie-PSW primality and miller rabin primality are good enough！！！！！！！！！

For what? Prove no exceptions are possible. A mere observation that none have been found is never good enough.

[bbb120]

Originally Posted by VBCurtis

For what? Prove no exceptions are possible. A mere observation that none have been found is never good enough.

for efficient，velocity

MOD WARNING: your are talking about PRP in a thread about primality. Stop it. This is strike 3!
The ban is coming if you keep up pointless trolling. Last warning!

[bbb120]

I want to master the ECPP algorithm ,
but it is difficult to understand when I read the Wikipedia of ECPP ,
I need a detail in ECPP ,
for example ,give me a example to prove 10^10+19 is a prime number by using ECPP algorithm .

[bbb120]

I'm losing faith in this forum

[R.D. Silverman]

Originally Posted by kriesel

Break the problem down:

1. How big is the current DC backlog, in some measurable and useful units?
2. What software would be right to use for LL DC on the specific hardware? (Mlucas supports ARM processors)
3. What is the right configuration to ensure reasonable efficiency consistent with completing whole DC tasks within the day allowed?
4. How many such efficient instances could be run in parallel on the machine resources?
5. How does that compare to the total task size of DC catchup?
6. What would the cost be of exclusive access to such a machine for a day?
7. Is it even rentable?
8. How affluent are you, or effective at GoFundMe?
9. How skilled are you at compiling and running software on a supercomputer, perhaps by Linux VM scripting en masse, or will running the machine need to be subcontracted out, raising the funding required?

Alternately, how does one day of Fugaku's theoretical throughput compare to recent GIMPS DC throughput times number of days projected for GIMPS to catch up on DC and estimated mean GIMPS DC petaflops?

Add

(10) https://www.pinterest.com/pin/980729256323680595/

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by retina

The solution can be found with no questions asked.

So... The question then becomes...

What is the question? Like, really, this is just wasting time.

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by uau

Either A is not random, and its answer tells you B is not random. Or A is random, and A being random tells you B cannot also be random at the same time.

A sincere question: have you read any of the prior art?

[uau]

Originally Posted by chalsall

A sincere question: have you read any of the prior art?

I'm not sure about either what you mean by "prior art" or what you're generally after by this question.