![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2006-11-24 at 22:41 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
![]()
Yes, Windows XP.
I was getting per iteration times of about 0.100s, whereas my best times now are about 0.125s. Unfortunately, the speed-up quickly wore off, and when I tried the same tactic again, no speed-up occured. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
110110111102 Posts |
![]()
Anyway, it seems that the Time feature in the Advanced menu of Prime95 will not allow me to play with exponents larger than 99,999,999.
I wonder though: If I play around with Test, will it disrupt my current (serious) LL test? More specifically, will I have to start all over again? Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2006-11-27 at 00:27 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() I'll upgrade to version 24.14 to make sure this doesn't happen again. Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2007-01-22 at 00:22 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Max FFT Size? | aketilander | Software | 44 | 2018-12-19 17:58 |
Force FFT-size to be used | kruoli | Software | 4 | 2017-11-17 18:14 |
Pi(x) value for x at 10^16 size | edorajh | Computer Science & Computational Number Theory | 6 | 2017-03-08 20:28 |
Size optimization | Sleepy | Msieve | 14 | 2011-10-20 10:27 |
Exponent Size Gap | TimSorbet | PrimeNet | 8 | 2007-03-25 07:29 |