mersenne.ca - Page 89

LaurV · 2022-11-24, 07:20

Hey James, we just found out that in the PRP/LL table, the bars under the numbers in FP64 column are not correlated with the numbers. The other columns and the other table seem to be right, only this column is odd.

James Heinrich · 2022-11-24, 14:57

Thanks, fixed.

moebius · 2022-11-24, 17:32

And you should change in Estimated Lucas-Lehmer performance

AMD Radeon Instinct MI100 M100 XL CDNA 1.0 1,000 23,100 11,500 300 will not run

will run with gpuOwl

post

James Heinrich · 2022-11-24, 18:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by moebius

And you should change in Estimated Lucas-Lehmer performance
AMD Radeon Instinct MI100 M100 XL CDNA 1.0 1,000 23,100 11,500 300 will not run
will run with gpuOwl

Thanks, I didn't have any data on "CNDA" performance.
https://www.mersenne.ca/cudalucas.php?filter=mi100

LaurV · 2022-11-25, 04:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Heinrich

Thanks, fixed.

Buddy, you are getting older too! I thought is only me, haha.

You fixed the bar size but screwed up the descending sorting.

James Heinrich · 2022-11-25, 04:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

You fixed the bar size but screwed up the descending sorting.

No, the GFLOPS-DP sorting was always broken, perhaps you didn't notice it before when the bars were also broken.

Sorting should be fixed now.

harlee · 2023-01-21, 15:13

I would like to suggest an update to the Factoring Beyond First Factor web page. When selecting PM1 worktdo assigments, the number of tests saved is always set to 2. Could you add an option to allow the user to select the number of tests saved (should match what Prime95 would accept). Requesting this change as v30.9 and V30.10 now allows PFactor assignments with known factors. Just thinking ahead about the next new official release.

James Heinrich · 2023-01-21, 21:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by harlee

Could you add an option to allow the user to select the number of tests saved

Added.

harlee · 2023-01-22, 23:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Heinrich

Added.

Thank you for the change. Been thinking about another change. On the Exponents that were poorly P-1 factored page, what do you think about adding an option to find and display exponents with one or more known factors AND has P-1 results (exclude no P-1 work)? I'm thinking about looking to bring some smaller exponents with low P-1 B1 bounds to higher B1 bounds. A couple of examples:

M2507339
M2700281
M4000153

I can find some of these exponents by using the Factoring Beyond First Factor page but believe using Exponents that were poorly P-1 factored page would be better, easier, and faster.

James Heinrich · 2023-01-23, 01:25

That's not quite so easily done. I'll consider the problem, see if I can come up with a workable solution.

harlee · 2023-01-23, 20:02

Thought of another option but I've worked with computers long enough to know ideas are easy, programming the computer to do what you want is the hard part. Anyway, on the Factoring Beyond First Factor page, what about adding another field called something like "maximum B1 bound (optional)". When a value is entered in this field, everything works the same except only those exponents where the B1 bound is equal to or less then what is entered in the new field are displayed and exclude any exponents without any P1 results. Maybe if a B1 value is entered then by default the "Filter by P-1 status' must be something other then No P-1.

2023-01-23, 20:02	#979
harlee Sep 2006 Odenton, MD, USA 10111111₂ Posts	Thought of another option but I've worked with computers long enough to know ideas are easy, programming the computer to do what you want is the hard part. Anyway, on the Factoring Beyond First Factor page, what about adding another field called something like "maximum B1 bound (optional)". When a value is entered in this field, everything works the same except only those exponents where the B1 bound is equal to or less then what is entered in the new field are displayed and exclude any exponents without any P1 results. Maybe if a B1 value is entered then by default the "Filter by P-1 status' must be something other then No P-1. Last fiddled with by harlee on 2023-01-23 at 20:03

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Gaussian-Mersenne & Eisenstein-Mersenne primes	siegert81	Math	11	2022-12-16 14:09
Small inconsistencies between mersenne.org and mersenne.ca factor databases	GP2	mersenne.ca	44	2016-06-19 19:29
mersenne.ca (ex mersenne-aries.sili.net)	LaurV	mersenne.ca	8	2013-11-25 21:01
Mersenne Wiki: Improving the mersenne primes web site by FOSS methods	optim	PrimeNet	13	2004-07-09 13:51

2022-11-24, 07:20	#969
LaurV Romulan Interpreter "name field" Jun 2011 Thailand 10278₁₀ Posts	Hey James, we just found out that in the PRP/LL table, the bars under the numbers in FP64 column are not correlated with the numbers. The other columns and the other table seem to be right, only this column is odd.

2022-11-24, 14:57	#970
James Heinrich "James Heinrich" May 2004 ex-Northern Ontario 7770₈ Posts	Thanks, fixed.

2022-11-24, 17:32	#971
moebius Jul 2009 Germany 1010011111₂ Posts	And you should change in Estimated Lucas-Lehmer performance AMD Radeon Instinct MI100 M100 XL CDNA 1.0 1,000 23,100 11,500 300 will not run will run with gpuOwl post

2023-01-21, 15:13	#975
harlee Sep 2006 Odenton, MD, USA 191₁₀ Posts	I would like to suggest an update to the Factoring Beyond First Factor web page. When selecting PM1 worktdo assigments, the number of tests saved is always set to 2. Could you add an option to allow the user to select the number of tests saved (should match what Prime95 would accept). Requesting this change as v30.9 and V30.10 now allows PFactor assignments with known factors. Just thinking ahead about the next new official release.

2023-01-23, 01:25	#978
James Heinrich "James Heinrich" May 2004 ex-Northern Ontario 111111111000₂ Posts	That's not quite so easily done. I'll consider the problem, see if I can come up with a workable solution.