mersenneforum.org Share N+/-1 Primality Proofs
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2022-05-16, 21:54 #441 sweety439   "99(4^34019)99 palind" Nov 2016 (P^81993)SZ base 36 72·73 Posts The generalized repunit probable prime, R2731(685), N-1 has 31.345% factored, all algebraic factors are already entered. Factoring this 167 digit number (a factor of Phi(390,685), i.e. a factor of 685,195+) will enable N-1 proof for R2731(685), since this will make N-1 have >33.333% factored.
 2022-06-17, 16:46 #442 MDaniello     May 2019 Rome, Italy 2·3·7 Posts Code: 2684720974...01 N+/-1 350 digits 5548042917...01 N+/-1 497 digits (86^294+2)/6 N-1 598 digits (19607^353+1)/19608 N-1 1511 digits 4687274111...01 N-1 1381 digits (13088^373-1)/13087 N-1 1532 digits (17200^457+1)/17201 N-1 1932 digits (5183^521+1)/5184 N-1 1932 digits (17195^457-1)/17194 N-1 1932 digits In addition to these, several Carol-Kynea primes that lacked any kind of primality proof. Some other primes of this kind were missing from the db at all.
 2022-07-14, 06:36 #443 MDaniello     May 2019 Rome, Italy 2×3×7 Posts Code: (65540^101-1)/65539 N-1 482 digits (65656^109-1)/65655 N-1 521 digits (65560^113-1)/65559 N-1 540 digits (65638^113-1)/65637 N-1 540 digits (65528^113-1)/65527 N-1 540 digits (20589^127-1)/20588 N-1 544 digits (20881^127-1)/20880 N-1 545 digits (20902^127-1)/20901 N-1 545 digits (65592^127-1)/65591 N-1 607 digits 80513^544-2 N+1 2669 digits (1858^919+1)/1859 N-1 3001 digits
2022-07-14, 07:42   #444
sweety439

"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

72×73 Posts

Many of these numbers (not including numbers of the form k*b^n+1 and k*b^n-1, since N-1 or N+1 are trivially 100% factored) are of these forms:

(b^n-1)/(b-1) (use N-1) (n must be prime)
(b^n+1)/(b+1) (use N-1) (n must be prime)
(b^(2^n)+1)/2 (use N-1) (b is odd)
b^n+2 (use N-1)
b^n-2 (use N+1)
b^n+(b-1) (use N+1)
b^n-(b-1) (use N-1)
b^n+(b+1) (use N-1)
b^n-(b+1) (use N+1)
((b-2)*b^n+1)/(b-1) (use N-1)

For these numbers, factor N-1 or N+1 is equivalent to factor the Cunningham number b^n+-1 (or b^(n-1)+-1), and the smallest primes of these forms are minimal "prime > base" in base b (this is an interesting problem, there are 77 such primes in decimal (base 10), and they are 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 227, 251, 257, 277, 281, 349, 409, 449, 499, 521, 557, 577, 587, 727, 757, 787, 821, 827, 857, 877, 881, 887, 991, 2087, 2221, 5051, 5081, 5501, 5581, 5801, 5851, 6469, 6949, 8501, 9001, 9049, 9221, 9551, 9649, 9851, 9949, 20021, 20201, 50207, 60649, 80051, 666649, 946669, 5200007, 22000001, 60000049, 66000049, 66600049, 80555551, 555555555551, 5000000000000000000000000000027)

Quote:
 Originally Posted by MDaniello In addition to these, several Carol-Kynea primes that lacked any kind of primality proof. Some other primes of this kind were missing from the db at all.
For the Carol primes (b^n-1)^2-2 and Kynea primes (b^n+1)^2-2, N-1 is trivially 50% factored

Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2022-07-14 at 07:53

 2022-07-28, 16:13 #445 chris2be8     Sep 2009 23·103 Posts Is anyone on mersenneforum generating Primo certs for numbers around 964 digits? I'm running a script to prove small PRPs, working from 300 digits upwards, and I've noticed a lot of numbers where someone else proved them just before my script was about to prove them. So we could easily waste effort by working on the same numbers. I've seen a few by kotenok2000 around 763 digits. But the latest batch were anonymous. Moving to 980 digits would avoid collisions for a few weeks. Or better keep an eye on http://factordb.com/stat_1.php?prp and avoid the first few hundred numbers it shows. I've got another system working from 1000 digits upwards, So please also avoid the first few hundred numbers over 1000 digits.
 2022-08-09, 15:51 #446 chris2be8     Sep 2009 45018 Posts factordb seems to have stopped accepting new primo certificates. If I submit a certificate the response says "Saved certificate for processing.." but when I look at the number it still shows as PRP and does not say it has a certificate being processed. So the certificate seems to have vanished. I've had to stop my script to prove small PRPs, it was trying to prove the same numbers repeatedly.
 2022-08-10, 15:33 #447 chris2be8     Sep 2009 23×103 Posts Markus has replied to an email I sent, there was a bug in certificate processing. It's now fixed, but certificates submitted since Monday 8 August will need to be re-submitted. So I've re-started my scripts to prove smallish PRPs. Last fiddled with by chris2be8 on 2022-08-10 at 16:13 Reason: typo

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post James Heinrich Math 57 2011-09-12 14:16 cheesehead Soap Box 71 2010-01-14 09:04 spkarra PrimeNet 4 2009-11-20 03:54 Brian-E Information & Answers 7 2007-08-02 23:15 Orgasmic Troll Math 1 2004-12-30 15:10

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:39.

Wed Aug 17 17:39:41 UTC 2022 up 41 days, 12:27, 1 user, load averages: 1.46, 1.74, 1.66