20190509, 18:51  #1695 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
7·1,051 Posts 
No, I've been running mfaktc on a dozen gpus for years, and this is a new occurrence. It looks like it may dog those specific exponents for me until they are deeply enough trial factored. (Hopefully not further up in bit level than that!)

20190509, 19:08  #1696  
3^{2}×379 Posts 
Quote:
Ok I don't know mfaktc. With mfakto never had an issue, though I fetch/submit via mfloop.py 

20190510, 16:23  #1697  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
7×1,051 Posts 
Quote:
Other manual reporting of tf is working ok for me. It's only specific exponents that show an issue. It appears to be related to a previous tf assignment expiration on them. I think this would be the case for mfaktc or mfakto, manual use of the web result reporting page or misfit or other reporting method. Quote:
It turns out the problem persists, even after the exponents have been taken above the bit level gpu72 recommends or primenet should be issuing. I hope someone can find the time to correct the results processing script for this issue to avoid future wasted toohighbitlevel trial factoring for all participants. The relevant manual assignments before reporting the latest results: Code:
Factor=1991E1D4EF6A1443E7C46167A966FFBA,93010733,75,76 Factor=A7D40822C6767282FDEE88489C9B8EB7,93010793,75,76 Factor=D243F3FD96E8D0104BA07EC4E54A2F33,93010829,75,76 Factor=3290E96380B548A47C71658E7CB169DE,93010867,75,76 Factor=4A3142F28040A46BE263DC6F002DADF2,93010903,75,76 Factor=D3F64D656CC6683BCF90929201E22C22,93010949,75,76 Factor=EAD2D6EDCCDBE6F661D01529058A0C92,93010991,75,76 Factor=76084F128113E1B8EF066BF5F6D2C0EA,93010993,75,76 Factor=B3914EF7593608104BA805173B318F49,93011111,75,76 Factor=9F88029B2DC0D722C40451210E87C3B5,93011189,75,76 Factor=E61F5C4623AD0B5DACA114FF70B463E5,93011197,75,76 Factor=F290F28CF11C8CF7FF43AD082F695914,93011227,74,75 Factor=307E7A6DB4717487AB1461A70FD0E7D6,93011257,74,75 Factor=A97CAC5D8421CBAA292689DEB25815B6,93011297,74,75 Factor=52C5677A2C035EDF089104646DD53C3F,93011311,74,75 Factor=41900F9267BAC0CF99CFE7AC28867432,93011341,74,75 Factor=1C78EA56966BC0BB7655B365B86D1E3A,93011351,74,75 Factor=2641B4A0F3314C9B94A8E67782BE99B7,93011419,74,75 Factor=EA65F4B08C92FB2FE5A0974E38C21827,93011459,74,75 Factor=556D5A147F268819672EEB14FB59103B,93011507,74,75 Code:
processing: TF nofactor for M93010733 (2^{75}2^{76}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 82.2710 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93010793 (275276) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 82.2709 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93010829 (2^{75}2^{76}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 82.2709 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93010867 (275276) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 82.2709 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93010903 (2^{75}2^{76}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 82.2708 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93010949 (2^{75}2^{76}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 82.2708 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93010991 (2^{75}2^{76}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 82.2708 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011227 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1353 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011257 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1353 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011297 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1352 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011311 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1352 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011341 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1352 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011351 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1352 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011419 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1352 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011459 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1352 GHzdays. processing: TF nofactor for M93011507 (2^{74}2^{75}) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 41.1352 GHzdays. Code:
Factor=1991E1D4EF6A1443E7C46167A966FFBA,93010733,76,77 Factor=A7D40822C6767282FDEE88489C9B8EB7,93010793,76,77 Factor=D243F3FD96E8D0104BA07EC4E54A2F33,93010829,76,77 Factor=3290E96380B548A47C71658E7CB169DE,93010867,76,77 Factor=4A3142F28040A46BE263DC6F002DADF2,93010903,76,77 Factor=D3F64D656CC6683BCF90929201E22C22,93010949,76,77 Factor=EAD2D6EDCCDBE6F661D01529058A0C92,93010991,76,77 Factor=76084F128113E1B8EF066BF5F6D2C0EA,93010993,75,76 Factor=B3914EF7593608104BA805173B318F49,93011111,75,76 Factor=9F88029B2DC0D722C40451210E87C3B5,93011189,75,76 Factor=E61F5C4623AD0B5DACA114FF70B463E5,93011197,75,76 Factor=F290F28CF11C8CF7FF43AD082F695914,93011227,75,76 Factor=307E7A6DB4717487AB1461A70FD0E7D6,93011257,75,76 Factor=A97CAC5D8421CBAA292689DEB25815B6,93011297,75,76 Factor=52C5677A2C035EDF089104646DD53C3F,93011311,75,76 Factor=41900F9267BAC0CF99CFE7AC28867432,93011341,75,76 Factor=1C78EA56966BC0BB7655B365B86D1E3A,93011351,75,76 Factor=2641B4A0F3314C9B94A8E67782BE99B7,93011419,75,76 Factor=EA65F4B08C92FB2FE5A0974E38C21827,93011459,75,76 Factor=556D5A147F268819672EEB14FB59103B,93011507,75,76 So: Code:
Unreserved 93,010,733 Unreserved 93,010,793 Unreserved 93,010,829 Unreserved 93,010,867 Unreserved 93,010,903 Unreserved 93,010,949 Unreserved 93,010,991 Unreserved 93,010,993 Unreserved 93,011,111 Unreserved 93,011,189 Unreserved 93,011,197 Unreserved 93,011,227 Unreserved 93,011,257 Unreserved 93,011,297 Unreserved 93,011,311 Unreserved 93,011,341 Unreserved 93,011,351 Unreserved 93,011,419 Unreserved 93,011,459 Unreserved 93,011,507 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20190510 at 16:29 

20190520, 14:31  #1698 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
7×1,051 Posts 
In my logged on primenet workload / assignments pending page https://www.mersenne.org/workload/
under the system name that I set preferences to get PRP DC, and primenet earlier decided to treat a duly assigned PRP DC as a PRP first test until MadPoo intervened, it now lists Code:
UNKNOWN WORKTYPE "151" But in the first, initially sortedbyexponent tabular section, it's correctly shown as PRPDC. The exponent so afflicted is https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...9335979&full=1 which had first tests of differing PRP residue type. This was assigned per preset preference to a prime95 instance via the primenet API. (No manual assignment activity involved on this one.) 
20190520, 17:22  #1699  
Sep 2003
3×863 Posts 
Quote:


20190520, 21:39  #1700 
"6800 descendent"
Feb 2005
Colorado
1011100000_{2} Posts 
I just had a machine send a result to the server for 3 ECM curves completed, followed by a CURL timeout error. When the server was contacted again 70 minutes later, this time the data was resubmitted without error, but now the exponent has been credited with 6 curves instead of 3.
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...ll=1&ecmhist=1 Looking at the mprime log file, the resubmitted data was identical, including the AID, so it probably should have been silently rejected. 
20190521, 03:52  #1701  
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
5·677 Posts 
Quote:


20190521, 04:03  #1702  
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
5×677 Posts 
Quote:
Try it again. I don't know if a PRP doublecheck entry is any different than a first time test in the worktodo file so I just made it the same "PRP=blahblah" as a firsttime check. 

20190521, 04:14  #1703  
Sep 2003
3×863 Posts 
Quote:
The same also applies for work type 161 = "Doublecheck PRP on Mersenne cofactors" Last fiddled with by GP2 on 20190521 at 04:19 

20190521, 04:50  #1704  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
7·1,051 Posts 
Quote:
This is a PRP DC delivered by the Primenet API; PRP=(aid),1,2,79335979,1,75,0,3,1 in the worktodo file, PRP=(aid),1,2,79335979,1,75,0,3,4 in the All cpus and systemspecific listings on my assignments page PRP first test assignments do not list a residue type in the worktodo line on the assignments page, ending in a comma. PRP=(aid),1,2,exponent,1,75,0,3, 

20190521, 12:10  #1705 
"6800 descendent"
Feb 2005
Colorado
2^{5}×23 Posts 
Well, maybe the date or time should be considered then, because there's a security hole there. People could start reporting curves run that really weren't run, increasing their Ghz/day standings. Not to mention the inaccuracy of the number of curves run per exponent.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Official "Faits erronés dans de belleslettres" thread  ewmayer  Lounge  39  20150519 01:08 
Official "allGreektome Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread  ewmayer  Science & Technology  41  20140416 11:54 
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whingethread  cheesehead  Soap Box  56  20130629 01:42 
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread  cheesehead  Soap Box  61  20130611 04:30 
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread  Dubslow  Programming  19  20120531 17:49 