![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Jun 2012
3×1,283 Posts |
![]()
A new thread for 2020.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·7·461 Posts |
![]() Code:
UID PID PPID C SZ RSS PSR STIME TTY STAT TIME CMD pineapp+ 30651 29686 99 11505538 45052856 12 08:54 pts/11 Rl+ 9518:25 /home/nfsworld/msieve-svn-20190823/msieve-MP-V256-SKL -v -nc2 -t 14 linear algebra completed 839221 of 51257400 dimensions (1.6%, ETA 699h55m) Code:
992294513 relations 991199455 usable 679822896 unique 511124251 after singleton removal Did manage to build a matrix from 629723855 unique, but it was a bit cumbersome: Code:
Fri Jan 3 00:14:09 2020 weight of 60006039 cycles is about 6961061087 (116.01/cycle) Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2020-01-07 at 09:46 |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
23·3·5·47 Posts |
![]()
Dropping 14% from the matrix size from just 50M more unique relations sounds pretty good! I wonder if 25M more unique relations would have meaningfully helped the matrix; 50M is for me kind of a hard line where I really want more relations to not face something bigger, but you're already stretching the tools, as you noted.
I'd like to do a GNFS-200 on 15e, just because it's a Big Round Number. Perhaps a hybrid of offline 16e (or CADO) up to Q=100M, combined with 15e queue from 100M up. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
23·3·5·47 Posts |
![]()
On L4365, I'm getting "filtering wants 1M more relations" after one pass of in-memory singleton removal with TD set to 90. I have 197.2M unique relations and 75.3M duplicates.
May I have another 10MQ? Or 20? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Jun 2012
3×1,283 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
23×3×5×47 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
89·113 Posts |
![]()
I can LA 33331_267.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Jun 2012
74118 Posts |
![]() Code:
p74 factor: 63146266403491097505456958543771519866531286235829049932705522770396114797 p159 factor: 502359711161757421016410192688166297917171056378426903635199335536365634437389348511892855963909336883092645357270193940562520137791470938242506382255079415667 |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
130108 Posts |
![]()
L4365b is complete:
Code:
p86 factor: 25822548244299880006391249505592569731337769069672690296006992583112443319353229235941 Mon Feb 3 09:48:13 2020 p125 factor: 76097052239250743628646066953269717664413797368576928648747487396621406664383446306987339367155281257014361063842022979551961 Log at https://pastebin.com/LW2vgMeK I can do the matrix on L4635A when ready. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×7×461 Posts |
![]() Code:
Wed Feb 12 23:55:48 2020 p77 factor: 27699165354693819016801075486232972683723699059340461464932398144896384968753 Wed Feb 12 23:55:48 2020 p123 factor: 138045480967182100682657375185450702724737432877108829119835497270093124360933783400049080678451873650763452274375127767069 37.4 days on 14 cores i9/7940X for 51.26M matrix (brief pause in the middle due to electrical works, after which to my surprise the -ncr ran at 2/3 the speed of the previous half's work) |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
193616 Posts |
![]()
ETA for F1645 is 11 March: 46.9M matrix
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2020 14e post processing reservations and results | swellman | NFS@Home | 544 | 2020-12-31 15:14 |
2019 14e post processing reservations and results | swellman | NFS@Home | 862 | 2019-12-31 10:51 |
2019 15e post processing reservations and results | swellman | NFS@Home | 220 | 2019-12-28 16:40 |
2018 15e post-processing reservations and results | fivemack | NFS@Home | 221 | 2019-01-04 13:08 |
2018 14e post processing reservations and results | pinhodecarlos | NFS@Home | 551 | 2019-01-04 13:06 |