mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2002-10-17, 01:08   #1
outlnder
 
outlnder's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

2×3×53 Posts
Default Bad LL Tests

I just looked at the "Bad tests" document found on the Status Page.

What will be happening to those exponents?

Will they be released to be redone, or have they already been triple checked and have 2 matching results??
outlnder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-10-17, 04:00   #2
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

5·19·71 Posts
Default

They have already been triple-checked. The only way we know which tests are bad is when we finally get a matching double-check.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-10-17, 08:45   #3
outlnder
 
outlnder's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

13E16 Posts
Default

Are there any plans on telling the people who have turned in multiple bad tests??

This would let them know which machines had errors.

I noticed that I had 2 bad tests. In fact the last one on the list was mine. Fortunately I have corrected all the problems on those machines(crosses fingers and prays).
outlnder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-10-17, 17:54   #4
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

25268 Posts
Default

I´ve also been browsing that file, and noticed several exponents with an error count of 00000000. How were they found to be bad?
Second point: George says all exponents in that file have been triple-checked, so why are they still in the list? Because 3 different results were returned , or the result kept in the list is the one found to be wrong? In that case the exponent should be also in the double-checked file, which I do not think is the case.
Third: I´ve done several double-checks over the last months, and I can find most of the exponents in the double-checked file. There are a few I can´t find, neither in that file nor in the bad file. And no, they are not the last ones I have tested... What could be the reason?
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-10-17, 18:00   #5
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

267510 Posts
Default

A result for an exponent is found to be bad when there are three results submitted and two of them match. Then the third one is said to be bad since it didn't match whereas the others did. Since the chances of two incorrect reults matching are od the order of 1/2^64 this is a reasonable assumption.
This list, bad.zip is a list of all results that are known to be bad.

The list hrf3.zip (tested once but not doublechecked) actually also contains those exponents for which two results have been returned and they did not match. In this case, obviously one and maybe even both are bad results but we won't know which one till two matching results have been turned in. Check this hrf3.zip for your "missing" exponents. If all these exponents are coming from the same machine then maybe something is wrong with that machine. Nothing certain, just a guess.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-10-18, 01:22   #6
Kevin
 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Ann Arbor, MI

433 Posts
Default

About informing people of errors, maybe something could be built-in so when an error occurs, a box will pop open the next time the person attempts to open the Prime95 window, telling them something may be wrong with their hardware, or something of the sort.

Would exponents that need triple checking qualify as "priority" exponents?
Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-10-19, 12:11   #7
binarydigits
 
Aug 2002

22×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
Would exponents that need triple checking qualify as "priority" exponents?
Generally yes, but not necessarily. Double checks are now running on exponents from about 5.6M to about 8.6M. Any mismatches being currently reported would certainly need priority triple checks if the exponent is from the lower end of that range, but not if from the higher end (at least, not yet).
binarydigits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-10-20, 21:22   #8
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

2×683 Posts
Default

Garo
Thanks for your hint. I checked hrf3.zip and in fact my "missing" exponents were there. Now I fully understand how the whole thing works. My "missing"exponents came from different machines and they all produced no errors, so I hope they are the correct results ;)
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-10-21, 00:12   #9
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

267510 Posts
Default

Yeah it's probably the other test that's bad then.
garo.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Run P-1 before PRP tests alpertron Software 35 2018-02-27 16:01
p4 - 1.8 ghz - LL tests? joblack Hardware 12 2009-08-26 20:40
More P-1 tests dave_0273 Marin's Mersenne-aries 1 2006-03-23 00:03
PRP => LL-tests? Holmes Math 1 2005-05-13 17:18
Yet another set of 20 P-1 tests GP2 Completed Missions 5 2003-09-30 22:10

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:43.

Thu Apr 2 09:43:57 UTC 2020 up 8 days, 7:17, 3 users, load averages: 1.01, 0.99, 1.09

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.