20091103, 20:37  #276  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10010100001010_{2} Posts 
Quote:


20091103, 21:09  #277  
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2^{3}×5^{2}×23 Posts 
Quote:


20091104, 16:15  #278  
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
7·1,361 Posts 
Quote:
My apologies to everyone for the dataset not being updated as regularly as I have been doing in the past. I have been heavily involved as an Intervenor during a Rate Review Hearing for the last month. When not in court, I've been studying 1400 pages of evidence preparing for my cross examination of the electrical company's witnesses. I have just updated the dataset to Nov 1, and am currently running the spider for today. I'm now comfortable enough with the stability of the spider that I can cronjob it without worry it will do something stupid, so the results will be updated daily. Also, I've been doing some other minor work on the tool, including moving it to a dedicated domain. Please see http://www.mersenne.info/trialfactored.cgi Amongst other things, the bars have been made smaller, causing less obstruction of bars behind. As always, feedback welcome. Last fiddled with by chalsall on 20091104 at 16:15 Reason: s/then then/and then/ 

20091106, 16:14  #279 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2^{3}·5^{2}·23 Posts 
High level factoring summary chart....
This was done manually but would not have been possible without the chalsall graphs.
 Each row represents one 100 million range.  Each digit represents the LOWEST 6x bit level to which EVERY exponent in that million range has been factored to at least that many bits.  Where you see a dash it means less than 60 bits; which in every case is 59 bits except for a few under 20,000 which are 58 bits.  For example the lone 6 amidst the sea of 4's in the 300: row means that ALL exponents in the 333,xxx,xxx range are factored to at least 66 bits.  Currently TFLMH is assigning exponents that are under 60 bits (dashed). At the current rate of completion they will run out in 2010. Code:
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 000: 011123334 4444555566 6677777776 7777767766 6688888666 4444447444 4444444444 4444444444 4433444444 4444444444 100: 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 200: 3111111111 2222222222 1131111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1113111111 300: 3333333333 4444444444 4444444444 4464444444 4444444444 4444444444 4444444444 4444444444 4444444444 4444444444 400: 1111113111 1111111111 1111111131 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111112 500: 3333333333 2222222222 2222222222 2222222222 2222222222 4444444444 3333333333 2222222222 1111111111 0000000000 600:           700: 333333 3 333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 3333333333 1113 800: 33  333  000000000 0000     900:      3 3  3 33333 
20091106, 19:21  #280  
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9527_{10} Posts 
Quote:
I have codified this into Perl, and have added a Maximum and Average value into a graph. This is now live from my database. (While I enjoy legal proceedings, my first love is software.) Please see http://www.mersenne.info/tfminmax.cgi 

20091106, 21:32  #281 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
3^{2}×307 Posts 
987M is done to 64 bits. I did it but petrw1's table shows 3! Interesting how the two different representations complement each other and provide somewhat different information.

20091106, 22:54  #282  
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2537_{16} Posts 
Quote:
Indeed, 987M is at 64 bits... http://www.mersenne.info/trialfactor...000000,1000000 

20091106, 23:20  #283 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2^{3}×5^{2}×23 Posts 

20091127, 21:11  #284 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2^{3}×5^{2}×23 Posts 
<60 bit Progress!!!!!!
WOW...my rough counting from the graphs indicates that the number of exponents factored to less than 60 bits dropped from about 3.8M to about 1.8M in the last ONE week ... over 50%.
+ On the plus side is the obvious progess to LMH and GIMPS overall by eliminating exponents. + Another plus is that as we get into higher level factoring assignments that take longer to compete the database/server traffic will decrease.  I could suggest that a negative is that once the <64 TF bit assignments are gone the 32 bit architecture machines lose the one type of work they are the most efficient at. I have one left; I just retired one 3 days ago. Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 20091127 at 21:12 
20091127, 23:20  #285  
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
7·1,361 Posts 
Quote:
Code:
+++++  RangeStart  RangeDepth  FactorDepth  FDCount  +++++  0  100000000  59  7   600000000  100000000  59  1227914   700000000  100000000  59  392112   900000000  100000000  59  104330  +++++ 

20091203, 22:57  #286 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2^{3}·5^{2}·23 Posts 
Just a suggestion but while you are doing this; if you set your factoring limits to go to 63 bits immediately (i.e. FACTOR=900000001,59,63) you will significantly reduce server traffic when reporting results. Only one result would be sent per assignment and even a slow PIV would complete it in minutes.
Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 20091203 at 22:58 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Status  Primeinator  Operation Billion Digits  5  20111206 02:35 
62 bit status  1997rj7  Lone Mersenne Hunters  27  20080929 13:52 
OBD Status  Uncwilly  Operation Billion Digits  22  20051025 14:05 
12M LLR status  paulunderwood  3*2^n1 Search  2  20050313 17:03 
Status of 26.0M  26.5M  1997rj7  Lone Mersenne Hunters  25  20040618 16:46 