LMH status - Page 25

Uncwilly · 2009-08-26, 13:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

http://www.wabbit.com/trialfactored.cgi

Minor issue, when looking at a range where there are no intermediate values, like expos are only at 64 or 67 or 69 (for a whole chart), then there is no space left to show the seperation between bits.
Example 64, 65, and 69, no spaces left for 66, 67, and 68:
http://www.wabbit.com/trialfactored.cgi?71000000,100000

chalsall · 2009-08-26, 15:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Minor issue, when looking at a range where there are no intermediate values, like expos are only at 64 or 67 or 69 (for a whole chart), then there is no space left to show the seperation between bits.
Example 64, 65, and 69, no spaces left for 66, 67, and 68:
http://www.wabbit.com/trialfactored.cgi?71000000,100000

That is actually intentional. Do you think it would be better to have the blank rows appear between the lowest and highest? Please let me know your opinion on this -- it would be trivial to implement.

Also, I'm still trying to get back to this to make available the raw data, plus a line chart at the deepest zoom level, plus being able to rotate the 3D chart.

James Heinrich · 2009-08-26, 17:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Do you think it would be better to have the blank rows appear between the lowest and highest?

Yes. Any empty intermediate values should show as empty, not disappear, to minimize confusion.

10metreh · 2009-08-26, 17:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10metreh

One little snag: some of the "tall towers" block the view of the stuff behind.

This one went unnoticed.

chalsall · 2009-08-26, 18:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10metreh

This one went unnoticed.

No, it didn't. That's what the rotating (in 90 degree steps) will solve.

And I copy James Heinrich's comment as well.

Thanks for the feedback everyone. I will let you all know when this has been implemented. (I'm hoping this week, but so far, it's been a hell of a week (and a month)...)

garo · 2009-08-26, 20:02

Thanks Chris. You are doing a great job. I really like your GIMPS visualization.

petrw1 · 2009-10-28, 16:33

Yes, Chris, this is really cool.

One thought: Can you indicate the effective date of the chart.

Uncwilly · 2009-10-28, 17:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

One thought: Can you indicate the effective date of the chart.

It is effectively live.

Yes, I still think that the uncompressed version that I brought up and James seconded would be good.

garo · 2009-10-29, 11:16

But I think that is just an aesthetic choice. I like not having a huge graph if all exponents are to say 64 and one exponent is to 71. Then all those gaps are just tiresome.

James Heinrich · 2009-10-29, 12:11

Rather than fighting about what looks best, it should be pretty trivial to have a checkbox for "hide zero-value bit depths" and render it according to the user's preference.

petrw1 · 2009-11-03, 17:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

It is effectively live.

It is at least several days old. I was working on TF 80M to 64 bits. It still shows 98 in the 80.3M range. There were 98 about a week ago and the last one finished yesterday.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2009-08-26, 20:02	#270
garo Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 2763₁₀ Posts	Thanks Chris. You are doing a great job. I really like your GIMPS visualization.

2009-10-28, 16:33	#271
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 2³×5²×23 Posts	Yes, Chris, this is really cool. One thought: Can you indicate the effective date of the chart.

2009-10-29, 11:16	#273
garo Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 3²×307 Posts	But I think that is just an aesthetic choice. I like not having a huge graph if all exponents are to say 64 and one exponent is to 71. Then all those gaps are just tiresome.

2009-10-29, 12:11	#274
James Heinrich "James Heinrich" May 2004 ex-Northern Ontario 2²×3×277 Posts	Rather than fighting about what looks best, it should be pretty trivial to have a checkbox for "hide zero-value bit depths" and render it according to the user's preference.