![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
32·7·73 Posts |
![]() Code:
YYYY-MM 71-Exp 71-Days 72-Exp 72-Days 73-Exp 73-Days 74-Exp 74-Days Total-Days 2016-11 287,983 1,514,036 353,420 3,721,261 376,132 7,957,670 400,961 17,290,758 30,483,724 - All exponents 66M to 99M should/will be factored to 75 Bits. - Equal distribution of exponents in each Million range. - Used GhzDays for x.5M exponent for the entire Million range - Reduced by exponents expected to be factored in each range DID NOT account for what P-1 would eliminate though I believe that is NOT done until after TF to 75 is done. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
22×2,381 Posts |
![]() Quote:
2. For some users going to 76 bits makes sense above 80M, depending on their cards. 3. There is no rush on this. The LL'ing is far behind. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
11F716 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I suspect these exponents have already been LL'd. So this would be more of a DC-TF ... granted DC is a VERYYYYYYY long way from there. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
253416 Posts |
![]() Quote:
LLTF to 76 bits is clearly more important at the moment, and interestingly some are already working that for the P-1'ers currently. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
29×101 Posts |
![]()
And they should probably remain at 74 bits. Going to 75 bits only makes sense to do before both LL tests.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
249916 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
107678 Posts |
![]() Code:
YYYY-MM 71-Exp 71-Days 72-Exp 72-Days 73-Exp 73-Days 74-Exp 74-Days Total-Days Percent 2016-11 287,983 1,514,036 353,420 3,721,261 376,132 7,957,670 400,961 17,290,758 30,483,724 100.00% 2017-04 185,543 954,413 259,261 2,659,396 304,180 6,306,903 341,956 14,554,544 24,475,256 80.29% Understood that from 83M on we are going to 76 bits ... and maybe before 100M to 77 bits? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is LMH > 100M still alive? | TheMawn | LMH > 100M | 25 | 2016-04-18 16:11 |
100m p-1 and tf | aurashift | Software | 18 | 2016-04-14 13:48 |
Anyone working in 79.3M - 100M ?? | markr | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 21 | 2008-12-21 16:02 |
100M madness | stars10250 | Hardware | 8 | 2008-10-02 15:21 |
64 bits versus 32 bits Windows | S485122 | Software | 2 | 2006-10-31 19:14 |