20190306, 07:00  #89 
May 2005
658_{16} Posts 

20190306, 20:28  #90 
Sep 2006
Odenton, MD, USA
10100100_{2} Posts 
Thanks. Just checked and noticed that all of the older PRP results are now showing the known factors.

20190307, 09:11  #91 
Feb 2019
E_{16} Posts 
I started to use Prime95 v29.6 on machine with AVX512F for ECM work yesterday.
Today it found first factor for https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...=350249&full=1 But result is displayed weird in my account and history of exponent. It tells only Factor: without anything else. Last fiddled with by ixfd64 on 20190328 at 20:45 Reason: fixed formatting for you 
20190307, 15:22  #92 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
3·487 Posts 
And it doesn't show up in the Recent Cleared report, either. The corresponding PRPC test is there, tho.

20190307, 21:24  #93 
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2^{2}×1,873 Posts 

20190308, 15:23  #94 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2^{2}×3×7×61 Posts 
truncating benchmark output in worker window
Following is from prime95 v29.6b6, x64, on Win10 Pro, dual e52690. Benchmark output is truncated in the worker window, for high worker count on high core count systems. This has been reported also for previous prime95 versions. Scroll to far right for 16worker line; of "throughput xxxx.xx iter/sec", only "through" appears.
Code:
[Mar 8 09:10] Worker starting [Mar 8 09:10] Your timings will be written to the results.txt file. [Mar 8 09:10] Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/report_benchmarks [Mar 8 09:10] Benchmarking multiple workers to measure the impact of memory bandwidth [Mar 8 09:10] Timing 1024K FFT, 16 cores, 1 worker. Average times: 0.72 ms. Total throughput: 1382.83 iter/sec. [Mar 8 09:11] Timing 1024K FFT, 16 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 1.01, 1.01 ms. Total throughput: 1982.69 iter/sec. [Mar 8 09:11] Timing 1024K FFT, 16 cores, 4 workers. Average times: 1.96, 1.98, 1.95, 1.96 ms. Total throughput: 2036.00 iter/sec. [Mar 8 09:11] Timing 1024K FFT, 16 cores, 8 workers. Average times: 4.54, 4.54, 4.54, 4.54, 4.13, 4.11, 4.11, 4.13 ms. Total throughput: 1851.38 iter/sec. [Mar 8 09:11] Timing 1024K FFT, 16 cores, 16 workers. Average times: 9.80, 9.80, 9.82, 9.88, 9.86, 9.81, 9.84, 9.79, 8.48, 8.42, 8.55, 8.41, 8.41, 8.41, 8.42, 8.48 ms. Total through [Mar 8 09:12] Timing 1024K FFT, 16 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker. Average times: 1.00 ms. Total throughput: 995.87 iter/sec. [Mar 8 09:12] Timing 1024K FFT, 16 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers. Average times: 1.12, 1.11 ms. Total throughput: 1798.63 iter/sec. (etc) Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20190308 at 15:24 
20190308, 18:39  #95 
May 2005
2^{3}·7·29 Posts 

20190310, 12:52  #96 
Feb 2019
2·7 Posts 
The second ECM factor was found using prime 29.6. And it isn't displayed correctly in reports, too.
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...=351457&full=1 
20190310, 17:37  #97  
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
2×3^{2}×79 Posts 
Quote:
Linux x64 , Prime95 29.6 beta3 So I put FFT timings from 256K to 512K on 4 cores 

20190310, 21:31  #98 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2^{2}×3×7×61 Posts 
5/5 benchmarked ok
1) Prime95 v29.6b6 x64 on dual 8core E52690, Win 10 Pro; throughput benchmark 1,2,4,8,16 workers, HT and not, 1M32M, completed without incident;
2) Prime95 v29.6b7 x64 on 6core i78750H, Win 10 Home; throughput benchmark 13,6 workers, HT and not, 1M32M, completed without incident; 3) Prime95 v29.6b7 x64 on Core 2 Duo E8200, Vista; throughput benchmark 12 workers, 1M32M, completed without incident; 4) Prime95 v29.6b7 x64 on dual 6core Xeon X5650, Win 7 Pro; throughput benchmark 1,2,3,4,6,12 workers, HT and not, 1M32M, completed without incident; 5) Prime95 v29.6b3 x32 on Pentium 750 M, Vista; throughput benchmark 1M32M, completed without incident. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20190310 at 21:31 
20190310, 22:24  #99 
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
2·3^{2}·79 Posts 
So I put FFT timings from 256K to 512K on 4 cores, not throughput benchmark

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Prime95 version 29.2  Prime95  Software  71  20170916 16:55 
Prime95 version 29.1  Prime95  Software  95  20170822 22:46 
Prime95 version 26.5  Prime95  Software  175  20110404 22:35 
Prime95 version 25.9  Prime95  Software  143  20100105 22:53 
Prime95 version 25.8  Prime95  Software  159  20090921 16:30 